Abstract
The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that it depends on plant species used in the wetlands and their stubble growth attributes, as to whether monoculture or mixed wetland is superior in plant growth and nutrient removal. Monoculture and mixed wetland microcosms of five wetland plant species were studied. Significant differences in growth and aboveground biomass were found in the monoculture wetlands. Species that showed faster growth and larger biomass in monoculture wetland were also dominant in the mixed wetland. The mixed wetland exhibited similar biomass and root growth to the averages of five monocultures. ANOVA showed that there were very significant differences among the wetlands in removal rates of all the nutrients studied except nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). The removal rates from the mixed wetland were generally comparable to the highest removal rates from the monocultures. The species exhibited different stubble growth attributes, with some species showing increasing stubble growth and removal rates, while other species showing decreasing stubble growth and removal rates. The results indicated that in both monocultures and mixed constructed wetlands, growth and nutrient removal rates depended on plant species, and attributes of plant stubble growth affected overall growth and nutrient removal capabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agami, M. & K. R. Reddy, 1990. Competition for space between Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms and Pistia stratiotes L. cultured in nutrient-enriched water. Aquatic Botany 38: 195–208.
Amon, J. P., A. Agrawal, M. L. Shelley, B. C. Opperman, M. P. Enright, N. D. Clemmer, T. Slusser, J. Lach, T. Sobolewski, W. Gruner & A. C. Entingh, 2007. Development of a wetland constructed for the treatment of groundwater contaminated by chlorinated ethenes. Ecological Engineering 30: 51–66.
Bachand, P. A. M. & A. J. Horne, 2000. Denitrification in constructed free-water surface wetlands: II. Effects of vegetation and temperature. Ecological Engineering 14: 17–32.
Brisson, J. & F. Chazarenc, 2009. Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Science of the Total Environment 407: 3923–3930.
Chen, Z. H., F. Chen, X. C. Liu, X. Y. Cheng, Y. B. Wang & X. Y. Zhou, 2007. A new method for root biomass measurement in subsurface flow gravel-bed constructed wetlands. Acta Ecologica Sinica 27: 668–673.
Cheng, X. Y., M. Q. Liang, W. Y. Chen, X. C. Liu & Z. H. Chen, 2009a. Growth and contaminant removal effect of several plants in constructed wetlands. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 51: 325–335.
Cheng, X. Y., W. Y. Chen, B. H. Gu, X. C. Liu, F. Chen, Z. H. Chen, X. Y. Zhou, Y. X. Li, H. Huang & Y. J. Chen, 2009b. Morphology, ecology, and contaminant removal efficiency of eight wetland plants with differing root systems. Hydrobiologia 623: 77–85.
Coleman, J., K. Hench, K. Garbutt, A. Sexstone, G. Bissonnette & J. Skousen, 2001. Treatment of domestic wastewater by three plant species in constructed wetlands. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 128: 283–295.
Engelhardt, K. A. M. & M. E. Ritchie, 2001. Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and service. Nature 411: 687–689.
Fisher, J., C. J. Stratford & S. Buckton, 2009. Variation in nutrient removal in three wetland blocks in relation to vegetation composition, inflow nutrient concentration and hydraulic loading. Ecological Engineering 35: 1387–1394.
Fraser, L. H., S. M. Carty & D. Steer, 2004. A test of four plant species to reduce total nitrogen and total phosphorus from soil leachate in subsurface wetland microcosms. Bioresource Technology 94: 185–192.
Greenway, M., 2007. The role of macrophytes in nutrient removal using constructed wetlands. In Singh, S. N. & R. D. Tripathi (eds), Environmental Bioremediation Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 331–351.
Karathanasis, A. D., C. L. Potter & M. S. Coyne, 2003. Vegetation effects on fecal bacteria, BOD, and suspended solid removal in constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Ecological Engineering 20: 157–169.
Katharina, A., M. Engelhardt & M. E. Ritchie, 2002. The effect of aquatic plant species richness on wetland ecosystem process. Ecology 83: 2911–2924.
Kivaisi, A. K., 2001. The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecological Engineering 16: 545–560.
Konnerup, D. & H. Brix, 2010. Nitrogen nutrition of Canna indica: effects of ammonium versus nitrate on growth, biomass allocation, photosynthesis, nitrate reductase activity and N uptake rates. Aquatic Botany 92: 142–148.
Kyambadde, J., F. Kansiime, L. Gumaelius & G. Dalhammar, 2004. A comparative study of Cyperus papyrus and Miscanthidium violaceum-based constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in a tropical climate. Water Research 38: 475–485.
Lorenzena, B., H. Brix, I. A. Mendelssohn, K. L. McKee & S. L. Miao, 2001. Growth, biomass allocation and nutrient use efficiency in Cladium jamaicense and Typha domingensis as affected by phosphorus and oxygen availability. Aquatic Botany 70: 117–133.
Mitsch, W. J., Z. Li, C. J. Anderson, A. E. Altor & M. E. Hernández, 2005. Creating riverine wetlands: ecological succession, nutrient retention, and pulsing effects. Ecological Engineering 25: 510–527.
Picard, C. R., L. H. Fraser & D. Steer, 2005. The interacting effects of temperature and plant community type on nutrient removal in wetland microcosms. Bioresource Technology 96: 1039–1047.
Sorrell, B. K., A. Mendelssohn, K. L. Mckee & R. A. Woods, 2000. Ecophysiology of wetland plant roots: a modelling comparison of aeration in relation to species distribution. Annals of Botany 86: 675–685.
Tan, W. F., W. Y. Chen & Z. H. Chen, 2009. Influence of light intensity on the growth and ecophysiological characteristics of Hymenocallis littoralis. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29: 1320–1329.
Tanner, C. C., 1996. Plants for constructed wetland treatment systems—a comparison of the growth and nutrient uptake of eight emergent species. Ecological Engineering 7: 59–83.
Tews, J., U. Brose, V. Grimm, K. Tielborger, M. C. Wichmann, M. Schwager & F. Jeltsch, 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography 31: 79–92.
The Environment Bureau of the State, 2002. Methods for Water Analysis, 4th ed. Environment Science Press, Beijing: 210–285. (in Chinese).
Vymazal, J. & L. Kröpfelová, 2009. Removal of organics in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: a review of the field experience. Science of the Total Environment 407: 3911–3922.
Wetzel, P. R. & A. G. van der Valk, 1998. Effect of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Phalaris arundinacea, Carex stricta and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecology 138: 179–190.
Zhang, Z., Z. Rengel & K. Meney, 2007a. Growth and resource allocation of Canna indica and Schoenoplectus validus as affected by interspecific competition and nutrient availability. Hydrobiologia 589: 235–248.
Zhang, Z., Z. Rengel & K. Meney, 2007b. Nutrient removal from simulated wastewater using Canna indica and Schoenoplectus validus in mono- and mixed-culture in wetland microcosms. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 183: 95–105.
Acknowledgments
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30470346) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 06025056).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: S.M. Thomaz
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, ZC., Wang, M., Lai, WL. et al. Plant growth and nutrient removal in constructed monoculture and mixed wetlands related to stubble attributes. Hydrobiologia 661, 251–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0530-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0530-2