Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Covarying patterns of macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages along natural and human activity gradients: implications for bioassessment

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioassessment is based upon the premise that biological assemblages have predictable relationships with the surrounding natural and human environments. As the nature of these relationships can vary from region to region, it is important that environment–biota relationships be established prior to the initiation of any bioassessment program. In this study, multivariate analysis was used to establish how fish and benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) assemblages in southwestern Ontario streams vary across natural and human activity gradients. The use of canonical correspondence analysis allowed us to determine that changes in community composition of both fish and BMI are strongly correlated with variation in the extent of human activity. The primary source of variation in community composition across activity gradients appeared to reflect a shift from intolerant to tolerant taxa as the extent of human activity increased. Habitat and feeding traits, for BMI and fish respectively, accounted for a secondary source of variation primarily attributable to differences in the extent of human activity at the reach scale. However, variation in human activity, especially at the basin scale, covaried with the dominant natural gradient of surface geology, making interpretation of the results difficult. Implications for bioassessment studies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35: 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. C., R. H. Norris & T. B. Reynoldson, 2001. Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. C., R. H. Norris & T. B. Reynoldson, 2004. Bioassessment of Freshwater Ecosystems: Using the Reference Condition Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish (EPA 841-B-99-002), 2nd ed. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, D. W., J. B. Stribling, M. J. Paul & M. B. Hicks, 2006. Stressor tolerance values for benthic macroinvertebrates in Mississippi. Hydrobiologia 573: 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, D. A., 2005. Macroinvertebrate response to land cover, habitat, and water chemistry in a mining-impacted river ecosystem: a GIS watershed analysis. Aquatic Sciences 67: 403–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, S. A., D. P. Larsen, R. M. Hughes & P. R. Kaufmann, 1997. Assessing relative risks to aquatic ecosystems: a Mid-Appalachian case study. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35: 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M. L., P. M. Chainho & J. L. Costa, 2005. Regional and local environmental factors structuring undisturbed benthic macroinvertebrate communities in the Mondego River basin, Portugal. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 163: 497–523.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman, B. C. & M. J. Royal, 2004. Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 599–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, G. A., C. B. Portt & C. K. Minns, 2001. Morphological and ecological characteristics of Canadian freshwater fishes. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2554: iv + 89 p.

  • Corkum, L. D., 1989. Patterns of benthic invertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwestern North America. Freshwater Biology 21: 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danz, N. P., G. J. Niemi, R. R. Regal, T. Hollenhorst, L. B. Johnson, J. M. Hanowski, R. P. Axler, J. J. H. Ciborowski, T. Hrabik, V. J. Brady, J. R. Kelly, J. A. Morrice, J. C. Brazner, R. W. Howe, C. A. Johnston & G. E. Host, 2007. Integrated measures of anthropogenic stress in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin. Environmental Management 39: 631–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diana, M., J. D. Allan & D. M. Infante, 2006. The influence of physical habitat and land use on stream fish assemblages in southeast Michigan. In Hughes, R. M., L. Wang & P. W. Seelbach (eds), Influences of Landscapes on Stream Habitats and Biological Assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec, S., B. Statzner & M. Bournard, 1999. Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: patterns along a human-impacted river. Freshwater Biology 42: 737–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolédec, S., N. Phillips, M. Scarsbrook, R. H. Riley & C. R. Townsend, 2006. Comparison of structural and functional approaches to determining landuse effects on grassland stream invertebrate communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), 2005. ArcGIS, version 9.1. Redlands, CA.

  • Ferriera, M. T., L. Sousa, J. M. Santos, L. Reino, J. Oliveira, P. R. Almeida & R. V. Cortes, 2007. Regional and local environmental correlates of native Iberian fish fauna. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16: 504–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, F. A., B. C. Scudder, B. N. Lenz & D. J. Sullivan, 2001. Effects of multi-scale environmental characteristics on agricultural stream biota in eastern Wisconsin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 1489–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, J. G. & J. T. Petty, 2007. Response of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessment indices to water chemistry in a mined Appalachian watershed. Environmental Management 39: 707–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R. M. & T. P. Simon, 1999. Toward a united definition of guild structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. In Simon, T. P. (ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 123–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell, D. B., R. W. Langdon, R. A. Daniels, J. P. Kurtenbach & R. A. Jacobson, 1999. Classification of freshwater fish species of the Northeastern United States for use in the development of indices of biological integrity, with regional applications. In Simon, T. P. (ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 301–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, C. L., D. L. Miller & W. G. Layher, 1986. Fish ecoregions of Kansas – stream fish assemblage patters and associated environmental correlates. Environmental Biology of Fishes 17: 267–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P. & R. H. Norris, 2000. Performance of different landscape classifications for aquatic bioassessments: introduction to the series. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 367–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P., R. H. Norris, J. Gerritsen, R. M. Hughes, S. K. Jackson, R. K. Johnson & R. J. Stevenson, 2000. Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 541–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino, J., H. Mykra, J. Kotanen & T. Muotka, 2007. Ecological filters and variability in stream macroinvertebrate communities: do taxonomic and functional structure follow the same path? Ecography 30: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlihy, A. T., W. J. Gerth, J. Li & J. L. Banks, 2005. Macroinvertebrate community response to natural and forest harvest gradients in western Oregon headwater streams. Freshwater Biology 50: 905–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L., 1987. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Great Lakes Entomologist 20: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., P. R. Kaufmann, A. T. Herlihy, T. M. Kincaid, L. Reynolds & D. P. Larsen, 1998. A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1618–1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., S. Howlin & P. R. Kaufmann, 2004. A biointegrity index (IBI) for coldwater streams of Western Oregon and Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133: 1497–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infante, D. M., J. D. Allan, S. Linke & R. H. Norris, 2009. Relationship of fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages to environmental factors: implications for community concordance. Hydrobiologia 623: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L. R., 1988. Land-use changes in Illinois, USA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landscape Ecology 2: 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobin, B., J. Beaulieu, M. Grenier, L. Bélanger, C. Masisonneuve, D. Bordage & B. Filion, 2003. Landscape changes and ecological studies in agricultural regions, Quebec, Canada. Landscape Ecology 18: 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K., M. T. Furse, D. Hering & L. Sandin, 2007. Ecological relationships between stream communities and spatial scale: implications for designing catchment-level monitoring programmes. Freshwater Biology 52: 939–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennard, M. J., A. H. Arthington, B. J. Pusey & B. D. Harch, 2005. Are alien fish a reliable indicator of river health? Freshwater Biology 50: 174–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, B. W. & D. R. Barton, 1999. Associations between stream fish and benthos across environmental gradients in southern Ontario, Canada. Freshwater Biology 41: 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, B. W. & L. W. Stanfield, 2006. Hindcasting reference conditions in streams. American Fisheries Society Symposium 48: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, M. & J. D. Allan, 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 23: 257–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., 1984. Agriculture and stream water quality: a biological evaluation of erosion control practices. Environmental Management 8: 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, G. L., 2001. Applied Aquatic Ecosystem Concepts. Kendalll/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. W., A. H. Fayram, J. C. Panuska, J. Baumann & J. Hennessy, 2008. Positive effects of agricultural land use changes on coldwater fish communities in southwest Wisconsin streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 944–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 1999. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4.17. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meador, M. R. & R. M. Goldstein, 2003. Assessing water quality at large geographic scales: relations among land use, water physicochemistry, riparian condition, and fish community structure. Environmental Management 31: 504–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nijboer, R. C. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2001. Zeldzaamheid van de macrofauna van de Nederlandse binnenwateren. Werkgroep Ecologisch Waterbeheer, themanummer 19, alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands: 84 pp (in Dutch).

  • Nijboer, R. C., R. K. Johnson, P. F. M. Verdonschot, M. Summerhauser & A. Buffagni, 2004. Establishing reference conditions for European streams. Hydrobiologia 516: 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nislow, K. H. & W. H. Lowe, 2006. Influences of logging history and riparian forest characteristics on macroinvertebrates and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in headwater streams (New Hampshire, USA). Freshwater Biology 51: 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M., 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Geological Survey, 2000. Quaternary geology, seamless coverage of the Province of Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey, Data Set 14 – Revised.

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross & R. M. Hughes, 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish (EPA/444/4-89-011). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F., K. E. Doisy & L. D. Zweig, 2005. Stream invertebrate community functional responses to deposited sediment. Aquatic Sciences 67: 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, V. H., R. H. Norris & M. T. Barbour, 1995. Design and implementation of rapid assessment approaches for water-resource monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson, T. B., R. H. Norris, V. H. Resh, K. E. Day & D. M. Rosenberg, 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 833–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson, T. F., D. M. Rosenberg & V. H. Resh, 2001. Comparison of models predicting invertebrate assemblages for biomonitoring in the Fraser River catchment, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1395–1410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., G. E. Host & J. W. Arthur, 1993. Identification of predominant environmental-factors structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities within a large agricultural catchment. Freshwater Biology 29: 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., L. B. Johnson & G. E. Host, 1996. Landscape-scale influence on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl): 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., R. J. Haro, L. B. Johnson & G. E. Host, 1997. Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37: 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1996. Use of aquatic insects in biomonitoring. In Merrit, R. W. & K. W. Cummins (eds), An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque: 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. E., J. D. Allan & D. L. Erickson, 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11: 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Montoya, M. M., M. R. Vidal-Abarca, T. Puntí, J. M. Poquet, N. Prat, M. Rieradevall, J. Alba-Tercedor, C. Zamore-Munoz, M. Toro, S. Robles, M. Álvarez & M. L. Suárez, 2009. Defining criteria to select reference sites in Mediterranean streams. Hydrobiologia 619: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandin, L. & R. K. Johnson, 2000. Ecoregions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of Swedish streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. P., 1999. Assessment of Balon’s reproductive guilds with application the Midwestern North American freshwater fishes. In Simon, T. P. (ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J., R. C. Bailey, M. Harrass, C. P. Hawkins, J. Alba-Tercedor, C. Couch, S. Dyer, F. Fulk, J. Harrington, C. Hunsaker & R. Johnson, 2004. Designing data collection for ecological assessments. In Barbour, M. T., S. B. Norton, H. R. Preston & K. W. Thornton (eds), Ecological Assessment of our Aquatic Resources: Application, Implementation, and Interpretation. SETAC, Pensacola: 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, J. L., D. P. Larsen, C. P. Hawkins, R. K. Johnson & R. H. Norris, 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications 16: 1267–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., R. E. Beighley, L. C. Thompson, S. Brooks, C. Nilsson, G. Pinay & R. J. Naiman, 2003. Effects of land cover on stream ecosystems: roles of empirical models and scaling issues. Ecosystems 6: 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, N. K. M., L. N. Poff, D. M. Carlisle, S. R. Moulton II, M. L. Koski & B. C. Kondratieff, 2006. A database of lotic invertebrate traits for North America: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 187 [available on internet at http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/ds187].

  • Wang, L. Z., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl & R. Gatti, 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22: 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., J. Lyons & P. Kanehl, 2001. Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environmental Management 28: 255–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), 2000. Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. G. & R. C. Bailey, 2006. The stream and its altered valley: integrating landscape ecology into environmental assessments of agro-ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 114: 257–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. G. & R. C. Bailey, 2009. Improving the description of human activities potentially affecting rural stream ecosystems. Landscape Ecology. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9413-1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jennifer Wilson and Lucas Foerster for their contributions during the collection of field data. We acknowledge the assistance provided by Michelle Marcus, J. Wilson, L. Foerster, Trevor Shore, Paige Campbell, and Janice Wilcox during the subsampling of benthic macroinvertebrates. Funding was provided by the Grand and Upper Thames River Conservation Authorities and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Robert C. Bailey

    Present address: Cape Breton University, 1250 Grand Lake Rd., P.O. Box 5300, Sydney, NS, B1P 6L2, Canada

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond St. N., London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada

    Adam G. Yates & Robert C. Bailey

  2. Aquatic Ecosystem Impacts Research Division, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Environment Canada, 867 Lakeshore Rd., P.O. Box 5050, Burlington, ON, L7R 4A6, Canada

    Adam G. Yates

Authors
  1. Adam G. Yates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert C. Bailey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam G. Yates.

Additional information

Handling editor: Richard H. Norris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yates, A.G., Bailey, R.C. Covarying patterns of macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages along natural and human activity gradients: implications for bioassessment. Hydrobiologia 637, 87–100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9987-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9987-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation