Epipelic and pelagic primary production in Alaskan Arctic lakes of varying depth

Abstract

We compared on eight dates during the ice-free period physicochemical properties and rates of phytoplankton and epipelic primary production in six arctic lakes dominated by soft bottom substrate. Lakes were classified as shallow ($\overline {\text{z}}$ < 2.5 m), intermediate in depth (2.5 m < $\overline {\text{z}}$ < 4.5 m), and deep ($\overline {\text{z}}$ > 4.5 m), with each depth category represented by two lakes. Although shallow lakes circulated freely and intermediate and deep lakes stratified thermally for the entire summer, dissolved oxygen concentrations were always >70% of saturation values. Soluble reactive phosphorus and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN = NO₃ ⁻–N + NH₄ ⁺–N) were consistently below the detection limit (0.05 μmol l⁻¹) in five lakes. However, one lake shallow lake (GTH 99) periodically showed elevated values of DIN (17 μmol l⁻¹), total-P (0.29 μmol l⁻¹), and total-N (33 μmol l⁻¹), suggesting wind-generated sediment resuspension. Due to increased nutrient availability or entrainment of microphytobenthos, GTH 99 showed the highest average volume-based values of phytoplankton chlorophyll a (chl a) and primary production, which for the six lakes ranged from 1.0 to 2.9 μg l⁻¹ and 0.7–3.8 μmol C l⁻¹ day⁻¹. Overall, however, increased $\overline {\text{z}}$ resulted in increased area-based values of phytoplankton chl a and primary production, with mean values for the three lake classes ranging from 3.6 to 6.1 mg chl a m⁻² and 3.2–5.8 mmol C m⁻² day⁻¹. Average values of epipelic chl a ranged from 131 to 549 mg m⁻² for the three depth classes, but levels were not significantly different due to high spatial variability. However, average epipelic primary production was significantly higher in shallow lakes (12.2 mmol C m⁻² day⁻¹) than in intermediate and deep lakes (3.4 and 2.4 mmol C m⁻² day⁻¹). Total primary production (6.7–15.4 mmol C m⁻² day⁻¹) and percent contribution of the epipelon (31–66%) were inversely related to mean depth, such that values for both variables were significantly higher in shallow lakes than in intermediate or deep lakes.