Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A method for prioritizing the reestablishment of river continuity in Austrian rivers

  • EIFAC 2006: DAMS, WEIRS AND FISH
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

River continuity is one of the hydro-morphological elements supporting the classification of the ecological status of rivers. In order to achieve good ecological status in the continuity of rivers, the impacts of anthropogenic activities must be limited to the extent that some fish age classes may be missing and there may only be slight changes in species composition and abundance from the type specific community. The main goal of the project is to list priorities for removing obstruction to migration within 12 years to reestablish river continuity so as to allow undisturbed migration of aquatic organisms. The ecological status of the river, the cost–benefit ratio of the proposed restoration and the distance between obstructions are analysed. More than 200 obstructions in about 170 km of river were evaluated. A 1st ranking of the parameter “extension of undisturbed river length” shows significant alterations in comparison with the 2nd and 3rd ranking, where the river length is weighted over the parameters “ecological status” of the river reach and the “cost–benefit ratio” of the measure. The ecological status is classified by comparing the present versus the potential natural morphological conditions (Leitbild). The cost–benefit ratio takes into account the increase of the fish species composition and the cost of the measures in relation to local circumstances of available property and height of the drop. Examples of obstructions in the Pinka R. move back in the priority list to a maximum of −9 places and forwards to a maximum of +8 places. As a result the list of obstructions by priority for removal to be removed first at the top is analysed. The financial policy and a schedule for removal for the period 2003–2015 are based upon the results of the priority list.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BMLFUW - Lebensministerium, 2005. EU Wasserrahmenrichtlinie 2000/60/EG. Österreichischer Bericht der IST – Bestandsaufnahme. Informationen gemäß Artikel 5, 6, 7, 9 und den Anhängen II, III und IV der EU Wasserrahmenrichtlinie 2000/60/EG. BMLFUW Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft.

  • Buresch, P., 2001. Wiederherstellung der longitudinalen Durchgängigkeit der Wulka. MSc Thesis – in German. University of Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.

  • Goritschnig, M., 2003: Weiterentwicklung eines Bewertungsmodells zur Wiederherstellung des Gewässerkontinuums am Beispiel der Rabnitz/Bgld. MSc Thesis – in German. University of Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.

  • Heggenes, J., S. J. Saltveit, D. Bird & R. Grew, 2002. Static habitat partitioning and dynamic selection by sympatric young Atlantic salmon and brown trout in south-west England streams. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holub, T., 2003. Weiterentwicklung eines Bewertungskonzeptes zur Wiederherstellung der Durchgängigkeit des Oberlaufs der Pinka. MSc Thesis – in German. University of Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.

  • Joy, M. K., & R. G. Death, 2001. Control of freshwater fish and crayfish community structure in Taranaki, New Zealand. Dams, Diadromy or habitat structure? Freshwater Biology 46(3): 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., 1984. Auswirkungen des naturnahen Wasserbaues auf die Fischerei. Teil II. Wasserwirtschaft – Wasservorsorge, Forschungsarbeit, BMLuF, 188 S.

  • Jungwirth, M., 1998. River Continuum and Fish Migration – Going Beyond the Longitudinal River Corridor in Understanding Ecological Integrity. In Jungwirth, M., S. Schmutz, & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Blackwell Sciences Ltd. Fishing News Books, Oxford – London – Berlin: 19–32.

  • Jungwirth M., S. Muhar, & S. Schmutz, 2000. Fundamentals of fish ecological integrity and their relation to the extended serial discontinuity concept. Hydrobiologia 422: 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahnsteiner, R., 2003. Weiterentwicklung eines Bewertungskonzeptes zur Wiederherstellung der Durchgängigkeit des Unterlaufs der Pinka. MSc Thesis – in German. University of Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.

  • Mader, H., 2000. Upper Salzach Stream Care Plan, a Compromise Between Improve Flood Protection and Attain Near-natural Ecological Conditions. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Stochastic Hydraulics ISSH`2000, Beijing, July 25th–28th, 2000. A.A. BALKEMA, Rotterdam, Brookfield 2000.

  • Morita K., & S. Yamamoto, 2002. Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conservation Biology 16(5): 1318–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S., M. Schwarz, S. Schmutz, & M. Jungwirth, 2000. Identification of Rivers With High And Good Habitat Quality: Methodological Approach And Applications in Austria. In Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., & Schmutz, S. (eds), Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters, Hydrobiologia 422/423: 343–358.

  • Parasiewicz P., & M. J. Dunbar, 2001. Physical habitat modelling for fish: A developing approach. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 135: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roni P., T. J. Beechie, R. E. Bilby, F. E. Leonetti, M. M. Pollock, & G. R. Pess, 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F., 2000. Fish as indicators for the assessment of the ecological integrity of large rivers. Hydrobiologia 422–423: 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siligato S., & J. Böhmer, 2001. Using indicators of fish health at multiple levels of biological organization to assess effects of stream pollution in southwest Germany. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 8: 371–386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stefan M., 2002. Gewässerkontinuum Stooberbach - Prioritätenreihung zur Wiederherstellung. MSc Thesis – in German. University of Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.

  • Taylor C. A., J. H. Knouft, & T. M. Hiland, 2001. Consequences of stream impoundment on fish communities in a small North American drainage. Reg. Rivers: Research & Mgmt 17: 687–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C. J., 1754–1756. Grenzkarte Ungarn – Niederösterreich. Ungarisches Staatsarchiv Budapest.

  • Waidbacher H., & G. Haidvogl, 1998. Fish Migration and Fish Passage Facilities in the Danube: Past and Present. In Jungwirth, M., S. Schmutz, & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses Blackwell Sciences Ltd. Fishing News Books, Oxford – London – Berlin: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth, W., 1987. Ökomorphologische Gewässerbewertungen in Oberösterreich, (Gewässerzustandskartierungen). Österreichische Wasserwirtschaft 39(W. 5/6): 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitek, A., G. Unfer, C. Wiesner, D. Fleischanderl & S. Muhar, 2004. Monitoring ökologisch orientierter Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen an der Sulm/Stmk., Arbeitspaket: Lebensraum & Fischfauna. Wien. Studie im Auftrag des Amts der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung, Graz und des BM für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water, Atmosphere, Environment, Institute of Water Management, Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, 1190, Austria

    Helmut Mader

  2. Department 9, Water- and Waste Management, Government of Burgenland, Europaplatz 1, Eisenstadt, 7001, Austria

    Christian Maier

Authors
  1. Helmut Mader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut Mader.

Additional information

Guest editors: R. L. Welcomme & G. Marmulla

Hydropower, Flood Control and Water Abstraction: Implications for Fish and Fisheries

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mader, H., Maier, C. A method for prioritizing the reestablishment of river continuity in Austrian rivers. Hydrobiologia 609, 277–288 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9406-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9406-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation