Skip to main content
Log in

Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accumulation of sand and fine gravel (<5 mm diameter) on riverbeds can adversely affect benthic macroinvertebrates, which are good indicators of the ecological health of rivers. The possibility arises, therefore, that predictions of sedimentation could form a useful proxy for indicating the health of a river. The Sediment River Network Model (SedNet) constructs sediment budgets to predict the depth of bed material accumulation (BMA) in each link of a river network. This study tests whether the predicted BMA depth was associated with spatial differences in macroinvertebrate community structure, in the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment of southeast Australia. There was a significant, albeit limited, correlation. Riffle sites with low BMA depth (0–0.01 m) had a significantly different macroinvertebrate community structure compared to sites with medium (0.01–0.3 m) or high (>0.3 m) BMA depth. At these sites, taxa sensitive to habitat were in greater abundance when BMA depth was low. Additionally, riffle sites with high predicted BMA depth had lower values for three macroinvertebrate community structure measures—AUSRIVAS observed-to-expected (OE) taxa ratio, Ephemeroptera abundance and Plecoptera abundance. There was no significant difference in macroinvertebrate community structure between sites with medium and high levels of BMA depth. Possible reasons for this result are: (1) there may have been few sites in the high and medium categories to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a significant difference; (2) spatial variation in BMA depth within SedNet river links; or (3) only a minimal amount of BMA is required to change community structure. To further define spatial variation in biological damage from BMA, data are required on the spatial scale of variations in BMA depth and damage to macroinvertebrate community structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACTSER, 1997. Australian Capital Region State of the Environment Report. Office of the Commissioner for the Environment, Canberra, ACT.

  • Angradi, T. R., 1999. Fine sediment and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Appalachian streams: a field experiment with biomonitoring applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANZECC/ARMCANZ, 2000. Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters. National Water Quality Management Strategy. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra.

  • APHA, 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. N., A. W. Storey & P. M. Davies, 2005. Effects of catchment clearing and sedimentation on macroinvertebrate communities of cobble habitat in freshwater streams of southwestern Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 88: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, R. & I. D. Rutherfurd, 2005a. Measuring the reach-scale geomorphic diversity of streams: application to a stream disturbed by a sediment slug. River Research and Applications 21: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, R. & I. D. Rutherfurd, 2005b. Re-evaluation of the wave model as a tool for quantifying the geomorphic recovery potential of streams disturbed by sediment slugs. Geomorphology 64: 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. J. & M. A. Brock, 1999. Australian Freshwater Ecology Processes and Management. Gleneagles Publishing, Glen Osmond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. C. & T. J. Doeg, 1989. Impact of timber harvesting and production on streams: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research 40: 519–539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chessman, B. C., 1995. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates – a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & R. N. Gorley, 2001. Primer v5: User Manual/Tutorial, Primer E: Plymouth. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 1994. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordone, A. J. & D. W. Kelley, 1961. The influences of inorganic sediment on the aquatic life of a stream. California Fish and Game 47: 189–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, B. J., P. S. Lake, A. Glaister & N. R. Bond, 2006. Effects of sand sedimentation on macroinvertebrate fauna of lowland streams: are the effects consistent? Freshwater Biology 51: 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyles, R. J., 1977. Changes in drainage networks since 1820, Southern Tablelands, NSW. Australian Geographer 13: 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D. P. & R. H. Norris, 1989. Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates. Biological Conservation 50: 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, J. & E. Tsyrlin, 2002. The Waterbug Book. A Guide to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Temperate Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, I. D. & R. H. Norris, 1991. Effects of runoff and land clearing and urban development on the distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates in pool areas of a river. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42: 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1975. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereiningung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 19: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaller, M. D. & K. J. Hartman, 2004. Evidence of a threshold level of fine sediment accumulation for altering benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 518: 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, P. S., 2005. Perturbation, restoration and seeking ecological sustainability in Australian flowing waters. Hydrobiologia 552: 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman & J. P. Miller, 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, R., 1989. A sub sampler for samples of benthic invertebrates. Bulletin of the Australian Society of Limnology 12: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, R., D. Ryan & L. Metzeling, 2006. Regional and local species diversity patterns for lotic invertebrates across multiple drainage basins in Victoria. Marine and Freshwater Research 57: 675–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S., P. Sloane, J. Coysh, C. Williams & R. Norris, 2000. Australian Capital Territory, Australian River Assessment System (AUSRIVAS), Sampling and Processing Manual. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. H. & A. Georges, 1993. Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrate surveys. In: Rosenberg D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York: 234–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. H., I. Prosser, B. Young, P. Liston, N. Bauer, N. Davies, F. Dyer, S. Linke & M. Thoms, 2001. The Assessment of River Conditions (ARC): An Audit of the Ecological Condition of Australian Rivers. Final Report submitted to the National Land and Water Resources Audit Office, Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology and CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra.

  • Norris, R. H. & M. C. Thoms, 1999. What is river health? Freshwater Biology 41: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley, J. M. & R. J. Wasson, 2003. Changes in the flux of sediment in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, Southeastern Australia, since European settlement. Hydrological Processes 17: 3307–3320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. & R. H. Norris, 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwater Biology 36: 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, I., P. Rustomji, B. Young, C. Moran & A. Hughes, 2001a. Constructing river basin sediment budgets for the National Land and Water Resources Audit. Technical Report Number 15/01, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT.

  • Prosser, I. P., I. D. Rutherfurd, J. M. Olley, W. J. Young, P. J. Wallbrink & C. J. Moran, 2001b. Large-scale patterns of erosion and sediment transport in river networks, with examples from Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitioring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds) Freshwater Biomonitoring and Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherfurd, I. D., 2000. Some human impacts on Australian stream channel morphology. In: Brizga S. & B. Finlayson (eds) River Management: The Australasian Experience. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Melbourne: 11–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. C. & R. H. Norris, 2000. Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In: Wright J. F. & D. W. Sutcliffe, M. T. Furse (eds) Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, UK: 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, D. N., 1991. Natural Processes. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19: 139–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., S. Doledec, R. Norris, K. Peacock & C. Arbuckle, 2003. The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshwater Biology 48: 768–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, R. J., R. K. Mazari, B. Starr & G. Clifton, 1998. The recent history of erosion and sedimentation on the Southern Tablelands of southeastern Australia: sediment flux dominated by channel incision. Geomorphology 24: 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1995. Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects and Control. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. J., I. D. Rutherfurd & R. E. Hardie, 1999. On the cost of stream management and rehabilitation in Australia. In Rutherfurd, I. D. & R. Bartley (eds), Second Australian Stream Management Conference, 697–704.

  • Wilkinson, S. N., I. P. Prosser & A. O. Hughes, 2006. Predicting the distribution of bed material accumulation using river network sediment budgets. Water Resources Research 42: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J. & P. D. Armitage, 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21: 203–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J. & P. D. Armitage, 1999. Sediment deposition in a small lowland stream: management implications. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 15: 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J., J. Toone, M. T. Greenwood & P. Armitage, 2005. The response of four lotic macroinvertebrate taxa to burial by sediments. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 163: 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., 1995. Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., M. T. Furse & P. D. Armitage, 1993. RIVPACS: a technique for evaluating the biological quality of rivers in the U.K. European Water Pollution Control 3: 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology 14: 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, C., 2003. Sediment slug mapping in the Murrumbidgee River and select tributaries – methods paper. DLWC Centre for Natural Resources, Queanbeyan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks goes to the Institute for Applied Ecology at the University of Canberra, eWater CRC and to the CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship for providing support for this project; Paul Rustomji, Jeremy Groves, Michael Peat and Sue Nichols for reading drafts of the manuscript; Nicky Grigg, David Williams, Andrew Bell and three anonymous reviewers for greatly improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evan T. Harrison.

Additional information

Handling editor: D. Dudgeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, E.T., Norris, R.H. & Wilkinson, S.N. Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model?. Hydrobiologia 600, 49–64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9175-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9175-1

Keywords

Navigation