Skip to main content
Log in

A Simple Model of Phosphorus Retention Evoked by Submerged Macrophytes in Lowland Rivers

  • Short Research Note
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to quantify and model the effects of macrophytes on phosphorus retention in a lowland river. The seasonal course of phosphorus retention was calculated from the measured difference in TP between beginning and end of a 30-km river course and the estimated lateral P input. The coverage of submersed macrophytes was mapped and coincided with the difference between theoretical water level (without vegetation) and the observed one. Therefore, the increase in water level was used as measure of the macrophytes’ abundance. In years with rare vegetation (1991–1994), P was retained in winter and remobilized in summer. In years with dense stands of macrophytes (1995–2002), net P retention was highest in summer and amounted up to 20% of TP load, and was negative during winter. The annual P budget was close to zero in both periods. The found sinusoidal annual pattern of total phosphorus retention was used to create a retention model for vegetated lowland rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behrendt H. and Opitz D. (2000). Retention of nutrients in river systems: dependence on specific runoff and hydraulic load. Hydrobiologia 410: 111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo D. J., Webster J. R. and Benfield E. F. (1991). Mechanisms of stream phosphorus retention: an experimental study. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 10: 225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driescher E. and Gelbrecht J. (1993). Assessing the diffuse phosphorus input from subsurface to surface waters in the catchment area of the lower River Spree (Germany). Water Science & Technology 28: 337–347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer H. and Pusch M. (2001). Comparison of bacterial production in sediments, epiphyton and the pelagic zone of a lowland river. Freshwater Biology 46: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler J., Bahnwart M. and Ockenfeld K. (2002). Growth and loss processes of riverine phytoplankton in relation to water depth. International Revue of Hydrobiology 87: 241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen J. D., Chambers P. A., James W. F., Koch E. W. and Westlake D. F. (2001). The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 444: 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland P. J., Newbold J. D., Elwood J. W. and Ferren L. A. (1985). Phosphorus spiralling in a woodland stream: seasonal variations. Ecology 66: 1012–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold J. D., Elwood J. W. and O’Neill R. V. (1981). Measuring nutrient spiralling in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 860–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy K. R., Flaig E. G. and Graetz D. A. (1996). Phosphorus storage capacity of uplands, wetlands and streams of Lake Okeechobee Watershed, Florida. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 59: 203–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen K. (1998). Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 39: 663–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M. and Gücker B. (2005). Macrophytes increase spatial patchiness of fluvial sedimentary records and evoke temporal particulate nutrient storage. Aquatic Geochemistry 11: 89–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M., Kozerski H. -P., Pluntke T. and Rinke K. (2003a). The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree. Water Research 37: 569–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M., Rinke K. and Köhler J. (2003b). A combined approach of photogrammetrical methods and field studies to determine nutrient retention by submersed macrophytes in running waters. Aquatic Botany 76: 17–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen L. M. and Kronvang B. (1995). Dynamics of phosphorus compounds in a lowland river system: importance of retention and non-point sources. Hydrological Processes 9: 119–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen L. M., Kronvang B. K., Laubel A. R., Larsen S. E. and Andersen B. (1998). Phosphorus retention in a Danish lowland river system. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung Limnologie 26: 956–962

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Triska F. J., Kennedy R. J., Zellweger G. W. and Bencala K. E. (1989). Retention and transport of nutrients in a third-order stream: channel processes. Ecology 70: 1877–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M. and Coops H. (2002). Aquatic macrophytes: restore, eradicate or is there a compromise?. Aquatic Botany 72: 387–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Schulz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schulz, M., Köhler, J. A Simple Model of Phosphorus Retention Evoked by Submerged Macrophytes in Lowland Rivers. Hydrobiologia 563, 521–525 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0027-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0027-1

Keywords

Navigation