Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does Market Integration Buffer Risk, Erode Traditional Sharing Practices and Increase Inequality? A Test among Bolivian Forager-Farmers

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sharing and exchange are common practices for minimizing food insecurity in rural populations. The advent of markets and monetization in egalitarian indigenous populations presents an alternative means of managing risk, with the potential impact of eroding traditional networks. We test whether market involvement buffers several types of risk and reduces traditional sharing behavior among Tsimane Amerindians of the Bolivian Amazon. Results vary based on type of market integration and scale of analysis (household vs. village), consistent with the notion that local culture and ecology shape risk management strategies. Greater wealth and income were unassociated with the reliance on others for food, or on reciprocity, but wealth was associated with a greater proportion of food given to others (i.e., giving intensity) and a greater number of sharing partners (i.e., sharing breadth). Across villages, greater mean income was negatively associated with reciprocity, but economic inequality was positively associated with giving intensity and sharing breadth. Incipient market integration does not necessarily replace traditional buffering strategies but instead can often enhance social capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Results do not vary when including village-level variables and their interaction with other relevant variables in the same multilevel model.

References

  • Añez, J. (1992). The Chimane experience in selling jatata. In Plotkin, M., and Famolare, L. (eds.), Sustainable Harvest and Marketing of Rain Forest Products. Island Press, Washington D.C, pp. 197–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., and Dion, D. (1988). The Further Evolution of Cooperation. Science 242(4884): 1385–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, C. A. (1992). Labor Specialization and the Formation of Markets for Food in A Shipibo Subsistence Economy. Human Ecology 20(4): 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Bowles, S., Hertz, T., Bell, A., Beise, J., Clark, G., Fazzio, I., Gurven, M., Hill, K., and Hooper, P. L. (2009). Intergenerational Wealth Transmission and the Dynamics of Inequality in Small-Scale Societies. Science 326(5953): 682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. (1988). The Evolution of Reciprocity in Sizeable Groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology 132: 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camera, G., Casari, M., and Bigoni, M. (2013). Money and Trust Among Strangers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

  • Cashdan, E. (1985). Coping With Risk: Reciprocity Among the Basarwa of Northern Botswana. Man (NS) 20: 454–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2005). Los pueblos indígenas de Bolivia: diagnóstico sociodemográfico a partir del censo del 2001. Santiago, Chile, United Nations.

  • Chicchón, A. (1992). Chimane Resource Use and Market Involvement in the Beni Biosphere Reserve. University of Florida, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Weerdt, J., and Dercon, S. (2006). Risk-sharing Networks and Insurance Against Illness. Journal of Development Economics 81(2): 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., and Krishnan, P. (2000). In sickness and in Health: Risk Sharing Within Households in Rural Ethiopia. Journal of Political Economy 108(4): 688–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R. (1996). A taste for movement: an exploration of the social ethics of the Tsimane of lowland Bolivia [Ph.D. Thesis]. Scotland: University of St. Andrews.

  • Ensminger, J. (1992). Making a Market: The Institutional Transformation of an African Society. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus, C. J. (1956). Culture, Structure and Process: the Appearance and Disappearance of Reciprocal Farm Labor. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 12(4): 444–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., and Gubert, F. (2007). The Formation of Risk Sharing Networks. Journal of Development Economics 83: 326–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M., and Lund, S. (2003). Risk-Sharing Networks in Rural Philippines. Journal of Development Economics 71(2): 261–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, M., and Eaves, J. (2007). Effect of Market Access On Sharing Practices Within Two Huaorani Communities. Ecological Economics 63(4): 776–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P., and Gruber, J. (2002). Insuring Consumption Against Illness. American Economic Review 92(1): 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Gurven, M., Byron, E., Reyes-García, V., Keough, J., Vadez, V., Wilkie, D., Leonard, W. R., Apaza, L., Huanca, T., et al. (2004). Why Don’t Markets Increase Economic Inequalities? Kuznets in the Bush. Human Ecology 32(3): 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., McDade, T., Tanner, S., Vadez, V., and Seyfried, C. (2007a). Signaling by Consumption in A Native Amazonian Society. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(2): 124–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Vadez, V., Valdés-Galicia, C., and Zhao, D. (2005). Why Do Subsistence-Level People Join the Market Economy? Testing Hypotheses of Push and Pull Determinants in Bolivian Amazonia. Journal of Anthropological Research 61(2): 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Tanner, S., and Seyfried, C. (2007b). On the Measure of Income and the Economic Unimportance of Social Capital: Evidence from A Native Amazonian Society of Farmers and Foragers. Journal of Anthropological Research 239–260.

  • Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Seyfried, C., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., McDade, T., Tanner, S., and Vadez, V. (2007c). Language Skills and Earnings: Evidence from A Pre-Industrial Economy in the Bolivian Amazon. Economics of Education Review 26(3): 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Vadez, V., Leonard, W. R., and Byron, E. (2007d). How Well Do Foragers Protect Food Consumption? Panel Evidence from A Native Amazonian Society in Bolivia. Human Ecology 35(6): 723–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M. (2004a). Economic games Among the Amazonian Tsimane: Exploring the Roles of Market Access, Costs of Giving, and Cooperation on Pro-Social Game Behavior. Experimental Economics 7(1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M. (2004b). Reciprocal Altruism and Food Sharing Decisions Among Hiwi and Ache Hunter-Gatherers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56: 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (2002). From Forest to Reservation: Transitions in Food Sharing Behavior Among the Ache of Paraguay. Journal of Anthropological Research 58(1): 93–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., and Gutierrez, M. (2006). How Long Does It Take To Become A Proficient Hunter? Implications for the Evolution of Delayed Growth. Journal of Human Evolution 51: 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., and Zelada, S. A. (2007). Mortality Experience of Tsimane Amerindians: Regional Variation and Temporal Trends. American Journal of Human Biology 19: 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Mulder, M. B., Hooper, P. L., Kaplan, H., Quinlan, R., Sear, R., Schniter, E., Von Rueden, C., Bowles, S., and Hertz, T. (2010). Domestication Alone Does Not Lead to Inequality. Current Anthropology 51(1): 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Stieglitz, J., Hooper, P. L., Gomes, C., and Kaplan, H. (2012). From the Womb to the Tomb: The Role of Transfers in Shaping the Evolved Human Life History. Experimental Gerontology 47: 807–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., and von Rueden, C. (2006). Hunting, Social Status and Biological Fitness. Social Biology 53: 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Stieglitz, J., Kaplan, H., and Rodriguez, D. E. (2014). The Evolutionary Fitness of Personality Traits in A Small-Scale Subsistence Society. Evolution and Human Behavior 35(1): 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Zanolini, A., and Schniter, E. (2008). Culture Sometimes Matters: Intra-Cultural Variation in Pro-Social Behavior Among the Tsimane of Bolivia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 67: 587–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haagsma, R., and Mouche, P. (2013). Egalitarian Norms, Economic Development, and Ethnic Polarization. Journal of Comparative Economics 41(3): 719–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, J. D. (2010). MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalised Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package. Journal of Statistical Software 33(2): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R., and McCabe, C. (2007). Meal Sharing Among the Ye’kwana. Human Nature 18(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handcock. (2013). Reldist: relative distribution methods.

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., and Blurton Jones, N. G. (1991). Hunting Income Patterns Among the Hadza: Big game, Common Goods, Foraging goals and the Evolution of the Human Diet. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London B 334: 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (1997). Market Incorporation, Agricultural Change, and Sustainability Among the Machiguenga Indians of the Peruvian Amazon. Human Ecology 25(2): 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005). ‘Economic Man’ in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Economic Experiments in 15 Small Scale Societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6): 795–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and Hurtado, A. M. (2009). Cooperative Breeding in South American Hunter–Gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1674): 3863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, P. L. (2011). The Structure of Energy Production and Redistribution Among Tsimane’ Forager-Horticulturalists. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, P. L., Gurven, M., Winking, J., and Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Inclusive Fitness and Differential Productivity Across the Life Course Determine Intergenerational Transfers in A Small-Scale Human Society. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 282(1803): 20142808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi, A. V., and Gurven, M. (2013). Natural Cooperators: Food Sharing in Humans and Other Primates. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 22(4): 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S. (1885). Money and the Mechanism of Exchange.

  • Kaplan, H., and Hill, K. (1985). Food Sharing Among Ache Foragers: Tests of Explanatory Hypotheses. Current Anthropology 26: 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. (1993). Sharing in An Egalitarian Kalahari Community. Man (NS) 28: 479–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranton, R. E. (1996). Reciprocal Exchange: A Self-Sustaining System. The American Economic Review 830–851.

  • La Ferrara, E. (2002). Inequality and Group Participation: Theory and Evidence from Rural Tanzania. Journal of Public Economics 85(2): 235–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, W. R., and Thomas, R. B. (1989). Biosocial Responses to Seasonal Food Stress in Highland Peru. Human Biology 65–85.

  • Lesorogol, C. K. (2003). Transforming Institutions Among Pastoralists: Inequality and Land Privatization. American Anthropologist 105(3): 531–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E., Thomas, J. P., and Worrall, T. (2001). Informal Insurance Arrangements in Village Economies. Review of Economic Studies 69(1): 209–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. A., Lassek, W. D., Gaulin, S. J. C., Evans, R. W., Woo, J. G., Geraghty, S. R., Davidson, B. S., Morrow, A. L., Kaplan, H. S., and Gurven, M. D. (2012). Fatty acid Composition in the Mature Milk of Bolivian Forager-Horticulturalists: Controlled Comparisons with A US Sample. Maternal and Child Health 8(3): 404–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1998). [1848]. The Communist Manifesto. Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (2004). Six Approaches to Calculating Standardized Logistic Regression Coefficients. The American Statistician 58(3): 218–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (1999). Between the State and the Market: Can Informal Insurance Patch the Safety Net? World Bank Research Observer 14(2): 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, S., and Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and Simple Method for Obtaining R2 from Generalized Linear Mixed‐Effects Models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2): 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolin, D. A. (2012). Food-Sharing Networks in Lamalera, Indonesia: Status, Sharing, and Signaling. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(4): 334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyeiwu, S. (1997). Altruism and Economic Development: The Case of the Igbo of South-Eastern Nigeria. The Journal of Socio-Economics 26(4): 407–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. (2005). Meat Sharing for Coalitional Support. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N. (1993). Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and the Pressure for Generosity Among Foragers. American Anthropologist 95: 860–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polyani, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Rinehart, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putsche, L. (2000). A reassessment of Resource Depletion, Market Dependency, and Culture Change On A Shipibo Reserve in the Peruvian Amazon. Human Ecology 28(1): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia, V., Godoy, R., Vadez, V., Huanca, T., and Leonard, W. R. (2006). Personal and Group Incentives to Invest in Pro-Social Behavior. Journal of Anthropological Research 62(1): 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., and Wolpin, K. I. (1993). Intergenerational Support and the Life-Cycle Incomes of Young Men and Their Parents : Human-Capital Investments ; Coresidence ; and Intergenerational Financial Transfers. Journal of Labor Economics 11(1/pt.1): 84–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, P. (2010). The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life (Revised Edition): Princeton University Press.

  • Smith, E. A. (1988). Risk and Uncertainty in the ‘Original Affluent Society’: Evolutionary Ecology of Resource-Sharing and Land Tenure. In Ingold, T., Riches, D., and Woodburn, J. (eds.), Hunter-Gatherers, Volume 1: History, Evolution and Social Change. Berg, New York, pp. 222–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (2004). Why Do Good Hunters Have Higher Reproductive Success? Human Nature 15(4): 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, J., Blackwell, A., Quispe Gutierrez, R., Cortez Linares, E., Kaplan, H., and Gurven, M. (2012). Modernization, Sexual risk-Taking and Gynecological Morbidity Among Bolivian Forager-Horticulturalists. PLoS ONE.

  • Sugiyama, L. S. (2004). Illness, Injury, and Disability among Shiwiar Forager-Horticulturalists: Implications of Health-Risk Buffering for the Evolution of Human Life History. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 123: 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Team, R. D. C. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undurraga, E. A., Zycherman, A., Yiu, J., Bolivia Study Team T, and Godoy, R. A. (2013). Savings at the Periphery of Markets: Evidence from Forager-Farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. The Journal of Development Studies 1–14.

  • von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., and Kaplan, H. (2008). The Multiple Dimensions of Male Social Status in an Amazonian Society. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 402–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., and Stieglitz, J. (2014). Leadership in an Egalitarian Society. Human Nature 25(4): 538–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B. (1997). Social Foraging and the Behavioral Ecology of Intragroup Resource Transfers. Evolutionary Anthropology 5: 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yellen, J. E. (1990). The Transformation of the Kalahari! Kung. Scientific American 262(4): 96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M. (2009). Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology With R: Springer.

  • Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., and Elphick, C. S. (2010). A Protocol for Data Exploration to Avoid Common Statistical Problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1(1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Tsimane who participated in this study and Tsimane Health and Life History Project personnel. We also thank Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Sam Bowles, and the participants of the Santa Fe Institute Workgroup on Dynamics of Inequality in Small-scale Societies for stimulating discussions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study and all methods were approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the University of New Mexico. In Bolivia, all procedures were approved by the Tsimane Government (Gran Consejo Tsimane), by village leaders and by study participants. Because many Tsimane do not read or write, participant permission was verbal and it was obtained twice: an initial affirmation to participate and a second confirmation once all procedures had been explained.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

Funding was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-0136274, BCS-0422690) and National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (R01AG024119, R56AG02411). Adrian Jaeggi was supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Swiss NSF (PBZHP3-133443) and the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Gurven.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

Summary of sources used to obtain sharing and economic data. (DOCX 12 kb)

Table S2

Descriptive statistics on material and relational wealth variables for the sample of 119 households and nine communities for which data on all variables were available. Gini coefficients are age-adjusted and all monetary values are standardized to 2010 Bolivian currency (Bolivianos, Bs). (DOCX 11 kb)

Table S3

Linear regression models predicting variance in daily food production [CV kcals] by household as a function of material wealth and controls (age, age*age, average date of income interviews, average month of production interviews, number of risk days for production; details for controls not shown). Reported are the best-fit models based on stepwise AIC selection (DOCX 12 kb)

Table S4

Sharing depth and giving intensity as absolute calories rather than proportions. Poisson GLMs and linear regression models showing association between material wealth and giving, receiving, and net giving (giving-receiving) of food controlling for age, age2, and date of wealth interview (details for controls not shown). Best-fit models based on stepwise AIC selection are reported (DOCX 13 kb)

Table S5

Correlations between village-level predictors, and variance inflation factors (DOCX 12 kb)

Table S6

Multilevel Poisson model estimating contingency in food transfers, i.e. the association between giving and receiving at the household and village level. The variances of the contingency measures (in italics) are 10 times higher at the village level (0.01) compared to the household level (0.001) (DOCX 11 kb)

Figure S1

Mean daily food production as a function of household produce income. Solid line is predicted fit and dashed lines are 95 % CI controlling for wealth and average date of production interview. For detailed results see Table 1. (DOCX 50 kb)

Figure S2

Variance (coefficient of variation, CV) in daily food production as a function of wage income, holding the other factor at population average. Solid lines are predicted curves from the best-fit regression model, which included wage labor and wealth, and dashed lines are 95 % CI on these estimates. For detailed results see Table S3. (DOCX 47 kb)

Figure S3

Sharing breadth increases with wealth a) only for those with minimal or no Spanish speaking ability, b) for those with the highest education. For detailed results see Table 4b. (DOCX 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurven, M., Jaeggi, A.V., von Rueden, C. et al. Does Market Integration Buffer Risk, Erode Traditional Sharing Practices and Increase Inequality? A Test among Bolivian Forager-Farmers. Hum Ecol 43, 515–530 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9764-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9764-y

Keywords

Navigation