Skip to main content
Log in

The iconography of universities as institutional narratives

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coming of “brand society” and the onset of mediatization spur universities to strategize their visual identity and pay particular attention to their icon. Resulting from branding initiatives, university icons are visual self-representations and material-cum-symbolic forms of organizational identity. In this work we ask: What identity narratives are conveyed through the organizational iconography of universities? How do narratives combine in this iconography? Drawing upon content analysis of Internet front-page icons of 826 universities from 22 countries, we identify four identity narratives: guild-like classic narrative, professional scientific narrative, localized narrative, and organizational narrative. Second, we show that such visual self-representations of university identity appear as products of broad historical themes. Last, we consider the relations between the four visualized identity narratives, showing evidence for iconographic sedimentation between the compatible guild-like classical, professional, and local-national narratives, along with iconographic abrasion of the logic of managed organization on the former. We discuss such findings in relation to the historical studies of the institution of the university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The countries are Australia, Bolivia, Chile, Cuba, Germany, Egypt, France, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Luxemburg, Mongolia, Panama, Portugal, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, USA, and Vietnam.

  2. Even if most of these universities do not have their motto marked on the icon, often they still have a message conveyed in a “tag line” that they commonly include in their media communication.

  3. For example, the nineteenth century tale of the French model of the university (with its strict state control), while eclipsed by the Humboldtian model, still shaped a uniquely French university system (Musselin 2004).

  4. For example, the icon of the University of Tokyo is reminiscent of a Ginkgo leaf thus referring to its Asian context.

References

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aula, H.-M., & Tienari, J. (2011). Becoming ‘world-class’? Reputation-building in a university merger. Critical perspectives on international business, 7(1), 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. New Jersy: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, M. Y. (2004). When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 593–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzel, D. L. (2007). Universities sell their brand. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16(2), 152–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2011). Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities? Journal of Brand Management, 18(6), 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon IAU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Yemini, M., & Sadeh, E. (2014). Web-based analysis of internationalization in Israeli teaching colleges. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colish, M. L. (1997). Medieval foundations of the western intellectual tradition 400–1400. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusso, R. (2008). Reforming the European university: Social change in the shadow of the educational model and ‘quality’. In J. Resnki (Ed.), The production of educational knowledge in the global era (pp. 215–227). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. W., & Glaister, K. W. (1996). Spurs to higher things? Mission statements of UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 50(4), 261–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmestri, G., & Wezel, F. C. (2011). Breaking the wave: The contested legitimation of an alien organizational form. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6), 828–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G. S., Delmestri, G., & Oberg, A (2013). Branding the university: Relational strategy of identity construction in a competitive field. In L. Engwall & P. Scott (Eds.), Trust in Higher Education Institutions (pp. 134–147). London: Portland Press.

  • Drori, G. S., & Hyeyoung, M. (2006). The changing nature of tertiary education: Neo-institutional perspective onto cross-national trends in disciplinary enrollment, 1965–1995. In P. D. Baker & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), The impact of comparative education research on institutional theory (pp. 163–192). Elsevier Science.

  • Drori, G. S., Höllerer, M., & Walgenbach, P. (Eds.). (2014). The glocalization of organization and management: Issues, dimensions, and themes. In Global themes and local variations in organization and management: Perspectives on glocalization (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.

  • Engwall, L. (2008). Minerva and the media: Universities protecting and promoting themselves. In C. Mazza, P. Quattrone & A. Riccaboni (Eds.) European universities in transition: Issues, models and causes (pp. 32–48).

  • Frank, D. J., & Gabler, J. (2006). Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Shifts in academia in the 20th century. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2007). University expansion and the knowledge society. Theory and Society, 36(4), 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Hamilton, A. L., & Patvardhan, S. D. (2014). Image is everything: Reflections on the dominance of image in modern organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). New York: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, A. (2010). ‘Through the looking glass’: The promotional university 2.0. In M. Aronczyk & D. Powers (Eds.), Blowing up the brand: Critical perspectives on promotional culture (pp. 197–219). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D. (2009). Institutional heterogeneity and change: The university as fool. Organization, 15(4), 575–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1963/2001). The uses of the university (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Kornberger, M. (2009). The brand society: How brands transform management and lifestyle.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmütski, A. (2012). Between mission and market position: Empirical findings on mission statements of German higher education institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(1), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds, professions, states, and the advance of capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretek, P. M., Dragšić, Ž., & Kehm, B. M. (2013). Transformation of university governance: On the role of university board members. Higher Education, 65(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, C., Quattrone, P., & Riccaboni, A. (2008). Introduction: Found in translation? The persistence of the university as an institution. In Mazza (Ed.), European Universities in transition: Issues, models and causes (pp. 241–257). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Drori, G. S., & Hwang, H. (2006). World society and the organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 25–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 487–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2007). Higher education as an institution. In Patricia Gumport (Ed.), The sociology of higher education: contributions and their contexts (pp. 25–49). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrmana, K., Mab, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2004). The Long March of French Universities. Routledge and Falmer.

  • Nelson, A. R & Wei, I. P. (Eds.). (2012). The global university: Past, present, and future perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity.

  • Osman, H. (2008). Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: A genre perspective. Discourse and Communication, 2, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, E., & Washburn, J. (2000). The kept university. Atlantic Monthly, 285(3), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F. O. (2010). Accounting for excellence: Transforming universities into organizational actors. In V. Rust, L. Portnoi, & S. Bagely (Eds.), Higher education, policy, and the global competition phenomenon (pp. 54–75). New York: Pelgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F. O., & Christensen, T. (2013). The formalization of the university: Rules, roots, and routes. Higher Education, 65(4), 695–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoten, D. R., & Powell, W. W. (2010). Public research universities: From land grant to federal grant to patent grant institutions. In D. Rhoten, C. Calhoun, & S. Bagely (Eds.), Knowledge matters (pp. 54–75). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, P. (1993). Political authority and university formation in Europe, 1200–1800. Sociological Perspectives, 36(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüegg, W. (1996). A history of the university in Europe (Vol. I-III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The world-wide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M. L., Armstrong, E. A., & Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (2009). Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wæraas, A., & Solbakk, M. N. (2009). Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding. Higher Education, 57, 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (2003). Commercializing higher education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (2010). Creating ‘value’ beyond the point of production: Branding, financialization and market capitalization. Organization, 17(5), 517–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third generation university: Managing the university in transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is generously supported by two grants awarded to Gili S. Drori, from the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 812/12) and the European Commission’s Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (PF7-People-2012 322041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gili S. Drori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drori, G.S., Delmestri, G. & Oberg, A. The iconography of universities as institutional narratives. High Educ 71, 163–180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9894-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9894-6

Keywords

Navigation