Skip to main content

Beyond the Third Mission: Toward an Actor-Based Account of Universities’ Relationship with Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities in the Neoliberal Era

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

Abstract

Recently, there has been an expansion of political narratives that seek to develop universities’ links with society, predicated on the idea that academia needs to abandon the proverbial ivory tower and become more engaged with its environment. This chapter discusses the following questions: What is it that academics do when they engage with their societies? What are the ideas, issues and constraints surrounding these forms of engagement? How do they reflect and/or reproduce the concepts of (academic) authority? Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the UK, I develop a critical investigation of how academics’ narratives and practices interact with the structural conditions of knowledge production, how they relate to the status and rewards associated with the academia, and how they (re)construct the boundaries and power relations between the university and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P. (2012). Positioning Theory and Intellectual Interventions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(3), 304–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the Self, Resistance and Subjectivity Under Neoliberal Governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005). The Critical Turn to Public Sociology. Critical Sociology, 31(3), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canaan, J., & Shumar, W. (Eds.). (2008). Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Cross, M. (2013). Rethinking “Epistemic Communities” Twenty Years Later. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E3M. (2012). European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://www.e3mproject.eu

  • European Commission (EC). (2003). The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/education_training_youth/lifelong_learning/c11067_en.htm

  • European Commission (EC). (2012). The Higher Education Modernisation Agenda. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/agenda_en.htm

  • Eyal, G., & Bucholz, L. (2010). From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmwood, J. (Ed.). (2011). A Manifesto for the Public University. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylland-Eriksen, T. (2001). Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). A Cultural Political Economy of Competitiveness and Its Implications for Higher Education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. (2013). Missing Subjects. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3, 30–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2013). The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krčmarova, J. (2011). The Third Mission of Higher Education Institutions: Conceptual Framework and Application in the Czech Republic. European Journal of Higher Education, 1(4), 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research Policy and Academic Performativity: Compliance, Contestation and Complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1162–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Model in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). The Philosophy of the Present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedeva, M. (2007). New Tricks and Old Dogs? The Third Mission and the Re-production of the University. In R. Boden et al. (Eds.), Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Higher Education in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, T. (2004). On Mediators: Intellectuals and the Ideas Trade in the Knowledge Society. Economy and Society, 33, 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2010). The Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, W. (Ed.). (2004). A History of the University in Europe (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2008). Academics in a New Work Environment: The Impact of New Public Management on Work Conditions. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 204–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Davidson, M. (2014). Beyond Collusion and Resistance: Academic–Management Relations Within the Neoliberal University. LATISS (Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences), 7(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & McLauchlan, L. (2012). “Third Mission” Activities, Commercialisation and Academic Entrepreneurs. Social Anthropology, 20(3), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5, 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2000). The Neo-Liberal University. New Labor Forum, 6, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R., & Etzkovitz, H. (2010). The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating Academia: The Changing Structure of Academic Time. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2012). Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 20(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, R. (2012a). From Engagement to Impact? Articulating the Public Value of Academic Research. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, R. (2012b). Issues in the Articulation of “Impact”: UK Academics’ Response to “Impact” as a New Measure of Research Assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (2015). Redbrick: A Social and Architectural History of Britain’s Civic Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bacevic, J. (2017). Beyond the Third Mission: Toward an Actor-Based Account of Universities’ Relationship with Society. In: Ergül, H., Coşar, S. (eds) Universities in the Neoliberal Era. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55212-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55212-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55211-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55212-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics