Abstract
Recently, there has been an expansion of political narratives that seek to develop universities’ links with society, predicated on the idea that academia needs to abandon the proverbial ivory tower and become more engaged with its environment. This chapter discusses the following questions: What is it that academics do when they engage with their societies? What are the ideas, issues and constraints surrounding these forms of engagement? How do they reflect and/or reproduce the concepts of (academic) authority? Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the UK, I develop a critical investigation of how academics’ narratives and practices interact with the structural conditions of knowledge production, how they relate to the status and rewards associated with the academia, and how they (re)construct the boundaries and power relations between the university and society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Baert, P. (2012). Positioning Theory and Intellectual Interventions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(3), 304–325.
Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the Self, Resistance and Subjectivity Under Neoliberal Governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
Burawoy, M. (2005). The Critical Turn to Public Sociology. Critical Sociology, 31(3), 313–326.
Canaan, J., & Shumar, W. (Eds.). (2008). Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University. London: Routledge.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. London: Sage.
Davis-Cross, M. (2013). Rethinking “Epistemic Communities” Twenty Years Later. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137–160.
E3M. (2012). European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://www.e3mproject.eu
European Commission (EC). (2003). The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/education_training_youth/lifelong_learning/c11067_en.htm
European Commission (EC). (2012). The Higher Education Modernisation Agenda. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-education/agenda_en.htm
Eyal, G., & Bucholz, L. (2010). From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117–137.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.
Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. London: Routledge.
Holmwood, J. (Ed.). (2011). A Manifesto for the Public University. London: Bloomsbury.
Hylland-Eriksen, T. (2001). Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.
Jessop, B. (2008). A Cultural Political Economy of Competitiveness and Its Implications for Higher Education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Katz, C. (2013). Missing Subjects. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3, 30–33.
Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2013). The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
Krčmarova, J. (2011). The Third Mission of Higher Education Institutions: Conceptual Framework and Application in the Czech Republic. European Journal of Higher Education, 1(4), 315–331.
Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.
Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research Policy and Academic Performativity: Compliance, Contestation and Complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1162–1174.
Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Model in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1932). The Philosophy of the Present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
Nedeva, M. (2007). New Tricks and Old Dogs? The Third Mission and the Re-production of the University. In R. Boden et al. (Eds.), Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Higher Education in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
Osborne, T. (2004). On Mediators: Intellectuals and the Ideas Trade in the Knowledge Society. Economy and Society, 33, 430–447.
Peck, J. (2010). The Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.
Ruegg, W. (Ed.). (2004). A History of the University in Europe (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2008). Academics in a New Work Environment: The Impact of New Public Management on Work Conditions. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 204–223.
Shore, C., & Davidson, M. (2014). Beyond Collusion and Resistance: Academic–Management Relations Within the Neoliberal University. LATISS (Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences), 7(1), 19–37.
Shore, C., & McLauchlan, L. (2012). “Third Mission” Activities, Commercialisation and Academic Entrepreneurs. Social Anthropology, 20(3), 267–286.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5, 557–575.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2000). The Neo-Liberal University. New Labor Forum, 6, 73–79.
Viale, R., & Etzkovitz, H. (2010). The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating Academia: The Changing Structure of Academic Time. London: Palgrave.
Wacquant, L. (2012). Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 20(1), 66–79.
Watermeyer, R. (2012a). From Engagement to Impact? Articulating the Public Value of Academic Research. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(2), 115–130.
Watermeyer, R. (2012b). Issues in the Articulation of “Impact”: UK Academics’ Response to “Impact” as a New Measure of Research Assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 359–377.
Whyte, W. (2015). Redbrick: A Social and Architectural History of Britain’s Civic Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bacevic, J. (2017). Beyond the Third Mission: Toward an Actor-Based Account of Universities’ Relationship with Society. In: Ergül, H., Coşar, S. (eds) Universities in the Neoliberal Era. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55212-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55212-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55211-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55212-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)