Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does academic apprenticeship increase networking ties among participants? A case study of an energy efficiency training program

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to address the requirements of future education in different fields of academic professional activity, a model called Academic Apprenticeship Education was initiated in Finland in 2009. The aim of this article is to analyse the development of expert networks in the context of a 1-year Academic Apprenticeship Education model in the field of energy efficiency, which is a new and rapidly developing knowledge-intensive field. We examined the creation of networking ties among all course participants, the process of networking in small groups, and individual participants’ networking activity. Data was collected by administering a social networking questionnaire in the beginning and at the end of the training to all course participants (n = 87) and analysed using social network analysis and repeated measures ANOVA. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with organizers of the training to examine how the operational practices of the training supported networking. The results indicated that there was little change in the networking ties among all course participants. However, those small groups that were able to communicate appeared to create internal linkages. At the individual level, more new ties emerged for private sector actors than for public sector actors. In conclusion, we propose that a consolidated educational model should be created for the Academic Apprenticeship Education model in general. The quality of education might be better assured if the current ad hoc networks were not the only way to organise knowledge exchange among participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Finnish name of the education model is Oppisopimustyyppinen täydennyskoulutus (Gröhn 2011).

References

  • Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., Dias De Figueiredo, A., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., et al. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 48–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Simons, R. J., & Niessen, T. (2006). Considering diversity: Multivoicedness in international academic collaboration. Culture & Psychology, 12, 461–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., & Henderson, A. (2011). Developing learning professionals. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 432–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for windows. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2003). Knowing what we know. Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. In R. Cross, A. Parker, & L. Sasson (Eds.), Networks in the knowledge economy (pp. 208–231). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curseu, P. L., Janssen, S. E. A., & Raab, J. (2012). Connecting the dots: Social network structure, conflict, and group cognitive complexity. Higher Education, 63, 621–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dower, C., O’Neil, E., & Hough, H. J. (2001). Profiling the professions. A model for evaluating emerging health professions. Center for the Health Professions. San Francisco: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, M. (2006). The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 1, 145–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2010). ‘Knowledge workers’ as the new apprentices: The influence of organizational autonomy, goals and values on the nurturing of expertise. Vocations and Learning, 3, 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2011). Introduction. Apprenticeship as an evolving model of learning. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63, 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gröhn, I. (2011). Oppisopimustyyppisen täydennyskoulutuksen mallia etsimässä. Turun yliopiston koulutus-ja kehittämiskeskuksen julkaisuja B:3. Retrieved from http://futurex.utu.fi/julkaisut.php.

  • Gruber, H., Lehtinen, E., Palonen, T., & Degner, S. (2008). Persons in shadow: Assessing the social context of high abilities. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(2), 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guile, D. (2011). Apprenticeship as a model of vocational ‘formation’ and ‘reformation’: The use of Foundation Degrees in the aircraft engineering industry. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63, 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise. Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Howells, J. (1998). Management and the hybridization of expertise in network design. In R. Williams, W. Faulkner, & J. Fleck (Eds.), Exploring expertise: Issues and perspectives (pp. 265–284). London: Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytönen, K., Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2011). Young diplomats’ socialization to the networked professional cultures of their workplace communities. Vocations and Learning, 4, 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytönen, T., & Tynjälä, P. (2005). A learning network promoting knowledge management. Paper presented at the Researching Work and Learning Conference RWL05, Sydney, Australia.

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., West, M., & Ainscow, M. (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2004). Inter-firm collaboration, learning and networks. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., Talvitie, J., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Network ties, cognitive centrality, and team interaction within a telecommunication company. In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert. (pp. 273–294). Dordrecht: Kluwers.

  • Presentation memorandum. (15.4.2011). Ministry of Education and Culture/Education sector.

  • Rienties, B., Héliot, Y., & Jindal-Snape, D. (2013). Understanding social learning relations of international students in a large classroom using social network analysis. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9617-9.

  • Rienties, B., Hernandez Nanclares, N., Hommes, J., & Veermans, K. (2013). Understanding emerging knowledge spillovers in small-group learning settings: A networked learning perspective. In V. Hodgson, D. McConnell & M. De Laat (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning (pp. in press). The Netherlands: Springer.

  • Roxå, T., Mårtensson, K., & Alveteg, M. (2011). Understanding and influencing teaching and learning cultures at university: A network approach. Higher Education, 62, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talwar, R., & Hancock, T. (2010). The shape of jobs to come. Possible new careers emerging from advances in science and technology (2010–2030). Final Report. January 2010. Fast Future Research.

  • Vesalainen, J., & Strömmer, R. (1999). From individual learning to network learning. In T. Alasoini & P. Halme (Eds.), Learning organizations, learning society (pp. 117–139). Helsinki: Ministry of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vest, C. M. (2008). Context and challenge for twenty-first century engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 235–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitter, I., De Bruijn, E., Simons, P. R. J., & Ten Cate, T. J. (2011). Adding a design perspective to study learning environments in higher professional education. Higher Education, 61, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research has been funded by FUTUREX project that is part of European Social Fund programme. We would like to thank MA Hal White who assisted in improving the English language of present investigation as well as Otto and Antti Seitamaa for translating transcribed interviews from Finnish to English. We would also like to thank Katja Kontu for visualizing Fig. 2a, b.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaisa Hytönen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hytönen, K., Palonen, T., Lehtinen, E. et al. Does academic apprenticeship increase networking ties among participants? A case study of an energy efficiency training program. High Educ 68, 959–976 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9754-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9754-9

Keywords

Navigation