Abstract
Academic cultures might be perceived as conservative, at least in terms of development of teaching and learning. Through a lens of network theory this conceptual article analyses the pattern of pathways in which culture is constructed through negotiation of meaning. The perspective contributes to an understanding of culture construction and maintenance with a potential to aid academic developers and others in the endeavour to influence teaching and learning cultures in academia. Throughout the discussion the importance of supporting the weak links between clusters of individuals stands out as a feature to focus upon. We propose that the sheer complexity of culture construction and maintenance in academic organisations is likely to cause any single, isolated attempt for change to fail Instead, we argue that a multitude of inter-related initiatives over a long period of time is likely to distinguish strategies that are successful in influencing academic teaching and learning cultures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage Publications.
Ancona, D., Kochan, T., Scully, M., Van Maanen, J., & Westney, E. (2009). Managing for the future. Organizational behaviour & processes. South Western CENGAGE Learning.
Anderson, M., Scott, G., & Coates, H. (2008). A tight balancing act: Leadership challenges for university heads. Australian Council for Education Research. Downloaded from http://research.acer.edu.au/highereducation5.
Barabási, A. -L. (2003). Linked. How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York: Plume.
Bauer, M., Askling, B., Gerard Marton, S., & Marton, F. (1999). Transforming universities. Changing patterns of governance, structure and learning in Swedish higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Priorities of the professoriate. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cox, M. (2004). Building faculty learning communities. Chichester: Wiley.
Feito, J. (2002). Exploring intellectual community: Reflections on the evolution of a seminar. In D’Andrea, V., & Gosling, D. (Eds.). Proceedings from The London Scholarship of Teaching and Learning International Conference. London: Educational Development Centre, City University.
Gibbs, G., Knapper, C., & Piccinin, S. (2008). Disciplinary and contextually appropriate approaches to leadership of teaching in research-intensive academic departments in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 416–436.
Giddens, A. (2004). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goffman, E. (2000). Jaget och maskerna [The Presentation of self in everyday life 1959]. Stockholm: Prisma. (Orig. pub. 1959).
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Hedin, A. (2004). Från ideal till praxis! Hur behandlas policyprogram på institutionsnivå? En granskning av hur det pedagogiska programmet vid Uppsala universitet har mottagits. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Hemphälä, J. (2008). The instrumentality of talk: On the creation of sustainable organizations through social interactions. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology.
Huber, M., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning. London: Wiley.
Kallenberg, T. (2007). Strategic innovation in HE: The roles of academic middle managers. Tertiary Education Management, 13(1), 19–33.
Kezar, A. (2004). What is more important to effective governance: Relationships, trust, and leadership, or structures and formal processes? New Directions for Higher Education, 127, 35–46.
Luhmann, N. (2005). Förtroende—en mekanism för reduktion av social komplexitet [Vertrauen. Ein mechanismus der reduktion sozialer komplexität]. Riga: Daidalos, AB.
McNay, I. (2002). Governance and decision-making in smaller colleges. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 303–315.
Middlehurst, R. (2007). A challenging journey: From leadership courses to leadership foundation for higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 137, 45–57.
Newman, M., Barabási, A. -L., & Watts, D. (2006). Structure and dynamics of networks. New Jersey: University Presses of California, Columbia, and Princeton.
Newton, J. (2003). Implementing an institution-wide learning and teaching strategy: Lessons in managing change. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 427–441.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pearce, J. (2008). Identity and pedagogy: Critical reflections on university teaching. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.
Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2007). University teachers’ experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 140–155.
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009a). Teaching and learning regimes from within. Significant networks as a locus for the social construction of teaching and learning. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines. Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 209–218). London: Routledge.
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009b). Significant conversations and significant networks—exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559.
Roxå, T., Olsson, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2008). Appropriate use of theory in the scholarship of teaching and learning as a strategy for institutional development. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(3), 276–294.
Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline—The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. London: Penguin Book.
Simkins, T. (2005). Leadership in education: ‘What works’ or ‘what makes sense’? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(1), 9–26.
Stensaker, B. (2006). Governmental policy, organisational ideals and institutional adaptation in Norwegian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 43–56.
Tight, M. (2008). Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: A co-citation analysis. Higher Education, 55(5), 593–605.
Trevelyan, R. (2001). The paradox of autonomy: A case of academic research scientists. Human Relations, 54(4), 495–525.
Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change. New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education. Theories and practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practice in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 221–240.
Turnbull, S., & Edwards, G. (2005). Leadership development for organizational change in a New U.K. University. Advances in developing Human Resources, 7(3), 396–413.
van der Wiele, A., van Iwaarden, J. D., Dale, B. G., & Williams, A. R. T. (2007). Chapter 25 Improvement approaches. In B. G. Dale, T. van der Wiele, & J. van Iwaarden (Eds.), Managing quality (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. 610 pp.
Watts, D. J. (2004). Small worlds. The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roxå, T., Mårtensson, K. & Alveteg, M. Understanding and influencing teaching and learning cultures at university: a network approach. High Educ 62, 99–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9368-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9368-9