Abstract
Investment in higher education facilities in terms of both hardware and software has witnessed significant growth on a yearly basis since the reintroduction of the college entrance examination known as the NMT in 1977. However, a social assessment of graduates’ qualities seems to indicate that the improvement in skill levels and graduates’ general qualities has failed to keep pace with the growth in investment. As a bridge to relate college environment to student gains in learning, student self-determined involvement in educational activities plays an important role in analyzing the educational effects of colleges. Based on a conducted through the survey of Chinese College Student Experience Questionnaire, with data collected from 647 valid respondents, universities can observe and evaluate the levels and quality of students’ involvement in the educational process. The students’ involvement of educational activities can be investigated through data analysis, employing statistical methods of a structural equation model. In observing student involvement in the educational system, it becomes apparent that the students’ capacity for building on and playing a key role in the improvement of the quality of education they receive is largely controlled by their involvement activities in the learning process. In addition, both of the college environment and student motivation have a combined and significant effect on student involvement behaviors. Student involvement can be divided into three gradual but distinct levels (controlled, identified and integrated involvement) in accordance with the varying degrees of internalization. Student involvement will exponentially magnify the positive effects on student gains when colleges invest in new and additional resources, particularly when students become more deeply involved in the educational environment. In addition, when colleges make a concentrated effort to recognize the importance of student involvement, and they encourage and incentivise students to become involved, the college itself will benefit greatly from the improved university environment. This combination of mutually beneficial activity, therefore, represents a virtuous circle of promotion between college and students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies-struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46(2), 167–193.
Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A development theory for higher education. Journal of College student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
Athiyaman, A. (1997). Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: The case of university education. European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), 531–540.
Berdie, R. (1971). Self-claimed and tested knowledge. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 630–636.
Betz, E. L., Klinggensmith, J. E., & Menne, J. W. (1970). The measurement and analysis of college student satisfaction. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 3(2), 117–123.
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of teacher education, 41(3), 53–62.
Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., Vaughan, N. W., & Eder, D. (2009). Psychometric properties of three new national survey of student engagement based engagement scales: An item response theory analysis. Research High Education, 50, 775–794.
Chen, Y. K. (2004). Introduction of higher education quality guarantee system. Beijing: Beijing normal university press.
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H. (1993). A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility. Research 34, 269–287.
de Jager, J., & Gbadamosi, G. (2010). Specific remedy for specific problem: Measuring service quality in South African higher education. Research High Education, 60.
de Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2004) New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational research, 74(2), 141–170.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999a). The undermining effect is a reality after all: Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 692700.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999b). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 645–667.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Fang, Z. H. (1990). Review of Rogers’ student-centered instructional theory. Beijing: Beijing educational science press.
Hodson, P., & Thomas, H. (2003). Quality assurance in higher education: Fit for the new millennium or simple year 2000 compliant? Higher Education, 45(3), 375–387.
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2003). Diversity experiences and college student learning and personal development. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 320–334.
Hu, S., et al. (2012). An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 53(7), 738–754.
Jin, H. Q. (2011). The new view of higher education assessment. Science & Technology Information, 1, 552.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 28–30.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buekley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC) Commissioned Paper.
Kuh, G. D., Pace, C. R., & Vesper, N. (1997). The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 38, 438–449.
Lechuga, V. M. (2011). Faculty-graduate mentoring relationships: Mentor’s perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62(6), 757–771.
MacKenzie, A. B., & Wicker, S. B. (2001). Game theory and the design of self-configuring, adaptive wireless networks. Communications Magazine, 39(11), 34–48.
Maunder, R. E. et al. (2012). Listening to student voices: Student researchers exploring undergraduate experiences of university transition. Higher Education, 64(6).
Mergen, E., Grant, D., & Widrick, S. M. (2000). Quality management applied to higher education. Total Quality Management, 11(3), 348–353.
O’Conell C. (2012). Research discourses surrounding global university rankings: Exploring the relationship with policy and practice recommendations. Higher Education, 46(3), 709–723.
Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). Quality in higher education-a survey. Total Quality Management, 7(2), 168–172.
Pace, C. R. (1982). Achievement and the quality of student effort. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
Pace, C. R., & Kuh, G. (1998). College student experiences questionnaire (4th ed.). Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University.
Pascarella, E. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development : A critical review and synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–66). New York: Agathon Press.
Pascarella, E. (2001). Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 489–490.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. Bern: Penguin Group.
Pike, G. R. (2012). NSSE benchmarks and institutional outcomes: A note on the importance of considering the intended uses of a measure in validity studies. Research in Higher Education, 53(4), 149–170.
Pike, G. R., & Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 42, 431–454.
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. The Journal of Higher Education, 76.
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Self-concept research: A historical overview. Social Forces, 68(1), 36–41.
Shavelson, R. J., et al. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 411–431.
Tempelaar D. T., et al. (2013). The role of self- and social directed goals in a problem-based, collaborative learning context. Higher education, 65(1).
Tieu, T.-T., et al. (2010). Helping out or hanging out: The features of involvement and how it relates to university adjustment. Higher Education, 60(3), 343–355.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Webber, K. L., Hermanowicz, J. C., & Lee, K. (2008). A structural equation model examining the relationship between motivation, perceptions of the college environment, quality of effort, and student achievement in the first year of college. Relationship Between Motivation, Environment, Effort and Gains, 79(5), 540–563.
Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). How’m I doing: Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses. Change, 29(5).
Wu, M. L. (2007). Structure equation model: The operation and application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing University press.
Ye, H. (2008). The thoughts about enhancing students’ conversion thought. The Research of Higher Career Education, 20, 198–200.
Zhang, W. Y., & Li, H. B. (2009). The enlightenment of NSSE on undergraduate teaching. The Research of Chinese Higher Education, 10, 19–22.
Zhou, M. (1992). Research on freshmen’s autonomous learning competence. Higher Education of Chemical engineering, 4, 6–9.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Foundation of Major Project funded by the Tianjin Educational Committee (2012zd06). Author thanks to reviewers and coordinating editor for invaluable comments for this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H., Liu, J. & Chi, X. Regulatory mechanism of self-determination involvement in higher education: assessing Chinese students’ experiences. High Educ 67, 51–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9640-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9640-x