Abstract
There have been changes in the political economy since the 1980s, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has changed as well. Scholars have noted shifts in OECD discourse in some policy fields since that time: shifts away from what might be called classic neoliberal perspectives. This paper reflects on the changes in the political economy and in OECD and explores how they might be related to changes in OECD discourse in higher education. Specifically, it examines country reviews of higher education systems conducted by OECD in the mid-1990s and the late-2000s for evidence of shifts in its higher education discourse. Instead of a softening of neoliberal perspectives, it finds a further entrenchment of assumptions associated with neoliberalization. It also describes what appears to be a deepening contradiction in the discourse concerning the private and public benefits of higher education. Finally, it reflects on how the contexts of the political economy as framed by OECDs discourse, affects its proposed goals and strategies for higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Fourteen regions participated.
Sixteen participants.
References
Bastalich, W. (2010). Knowledge economy and research innovation. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 845–857.
Bradford, N. (2008). The OECD’s local turn: “Innovative liberalism” for the cities? In R. Mahon & S. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Carlaw, K. O. (2006). Beyond the hype: Intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 633–690.
Godin, B. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Conceptual framework or buzz-word. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 17–30.
Graefe, P. (2006a). Social economy policies as flanking for Neoliberalism: Transnational policy solutions, emergent contradictions, local alternatives. Policy and Society, 25(3), 69–86.
Graefe, P. (2006b). The social economy and the American model relating new social policy directions to the old. Global Social Policy, 6(2), 197–219.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34(3), 452–472.
Kuhn, M. (2006). European educational research—Contributions to the discourse about the EU as a ‘knowledge based society’. In M. Kuhn, M. Tomassini, & P. Simons (Eds.), Towards a knowledge-based economy: Knowledge and learning in European educational. New York: Peter Lang.
Macdonald, L., & Ruckert, A. (2009). Post-neoliberalism in the Americas: An introduction. In L. Macdonald & A. Ruckert (Eds.), Post-neoliberalism in the Americas. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Mahon, R. (2008). Babies and bosses: Gendering the OECD’s social policy discourse. In R. Mahon & S. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance. Vancovuer: UBC Press.
Mahon, R. (2010). After neo-liberalism? The OECD, the World Bank and the child. Global Social Policy, 10(2), 172–192.
Mahon, R. (forthcoming). Social investment according to the OECD/DELSA: A discourse in the making. Global Policy. Early view retrieved online May 6, 2103 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2012.00182.x/abstract.
Mahon, R., & McBride, S. (2008). Introduction. In R. Mahon & S. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance (pp. 3–24). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Martens, K., & Jakobi, A. P. (2010). Introduction: The OECD as an actor in international politics. In K. Martens & A. P. Jakobi (Eds.), Mechanisms of OECD governance: International incentives for national policy making?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McBride, S., McNutt, K., & Williams, R. A. (2008). Policy learning? The OECD and its jobs strategy. In R. Mahon & S. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Munck, R. (2005). Neoliberalism and politics, and the politics of neoliberalism. In A. Saad-Filho (Ed.), Neoliberalism: A critical reader. London: Pluto Press.
OECD. (1996a-Belgium). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Belgium. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1996b-Sweden). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Sweden. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997a-Denmark). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Denmark. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997b-Germany). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Germany. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997c-Japan). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Japan. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997d-New Zealand). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: New Zealand. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997e-Norway). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Norway. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997f-UK). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: United Kingdom. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997g-Virginia). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Commonwealth of Virginia, USA. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1998-Portugal). Thematic review of the first years of tertiary education: Country note: Portugal. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008a-Iceland). OECD Reviews of tertiary education: Iceland. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008b-Mexico). OECD Reviews of Teritary Education: Mexico. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008c-Netherlands). OECD Reviews of Teritary Education: The Netherlands. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008d-New Zealand). OECD Reviews of tertiary education: New Zealand. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009a). Tertiary education for the knowledge based economy. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009b-Czech). OECD Reviews of tertiary education: The Czech Republic. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009c-Norway). OECD Reviews of tertiary education: Norway. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009d-Poland). OECD Reviews of tertiary education: Poland. Paris: OECD.
Pal, L. A. (2008). Inversions without end: The OECD and global public management reform. In R. Mahon & S. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance (pp. 60–76). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.
Peters, M. (2001). National education policy constructions of the ‘knowledge economy’: Towards a critique. Journal of Education Enquiry, 2(1), 1–22.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002.
Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.
Rubenson, K. (2008). OECD education policies and world hegemony. In R. Mahon & S. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Ruckert, A. (2008). Making neo-Gramscian sense of the development assistance committee. In R. Mahon & B. McBride (Eds.), OECD and transnational governance. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Woodward, R. (2011). Fifty more years? Reform and modernization in the OECD. Political Insight, 2(2), 18–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunter, C.P. Shifting themes in OECD country reviews of higher education. High Educ 66, 707–723 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9630-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9630-z