Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for addressing multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems with various types of ordinal assessments. In addition to two existing types of ordinal assessments including ordinal scale and ordinal interval, a new type of ordinal assessment named as ordinal distribution is developed, which is profiled by a belief distribution on a ranking framework of alternatives. Ordinal scales and ordinal intervals are transformed into ordinal distributions to implement unification of three types of ordinal assessments. Internal consistency about transformation from ordinal scales and ordinal intervals into ordinal distributions is theoretically analyzed and proven. To find solutions, dominating degrees between two alternatives are constructed based on the unified ordinal distributions to determine possibility degree to which one alternative is superior to another. A control mode selection problem for an enterprise located in Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, who mainly manufactures core parts of high-speed train, is analyzed using the proposed method to demonstrate its applicability. Based on the data in the control mode selection problem, internal consistency about transformation from ordinal scales and ordinal intervals into ordinal distributions is verified. It is also verified by simulation in a general case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn BS, Choi SH (2012) Aggregation of ordinal data using ordered weighted averaging operator weights. Ann Oper Res 201:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capuano N, Loia V, Orciuoli F (2017) A fuzzy group decision making model for ordinal peer assessment. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 10(2):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capuano N, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Fujita H, Loia V (2019) Fuzzy Group Decision Making for influence-aware recommendations. Comput Hum Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang TH, Hsu SC, Wang TC, Wu CY (2012) Measuring the success possibility of implementing ERP by utilizing the incomplete linguistic preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 12:1582–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY, Tsao CY (2008) The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159:1410–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY, Wang JC (2009) Interval-valued fuzzy permutation method and experimental analysis on cardinal and ordinal evaluations. J Comput Syst Sci 75:371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZS, Zhang X, Rodríguez RM, Wang XJ, Chin KS (2019) Heterogeneous interrelationships among attributes in multi-attribute decision-making: an empirical analysis. Int J Comput Intell Syst 12(2):984–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2001) Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin KS, Fu C (2014) Integrated evidential reasoning approach in the presence of cardinal and ordinal preferences and its applications in software selection. Expert Syst Appl 41(15):6718–6727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong QX, Cooper O (2016) A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making. Eur J Oper Res 250(2):521–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Consensus reaching model in the complex and dynamic MAGDM problem. Knowl-Based Syst 106:206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl-Based Syst 162:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopazo E, Martínez-Céspedes ML (2017) Rank aggregation methods dealing with ordinal uncertain preferences. Expert Syst Appl 78:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan ZP, Liu Y (2010) An approach to solve group-decision-making problems with ordinal interval numbers. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 40(5):1413–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan ZP, Yue Q, Feng B, Liu Y (2010) An approach to group decision-making with uncertain preference ordinals. Comput Ind Eng 58:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Chin KS (2014) Robust evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights. Knowl-Based Syst 59:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Wang YM (2015) An interval difference based evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights and utilities of assessment grades. Comput Ind Eng 81:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang SL (2010) The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 206(3):601–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang SL (2011) An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Yang SL (2012) An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements. Eur J Oper Res 223:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Huhns M, Yang SL (2014) A consensus framework for multiple attribute group decision analysis in an evidential reasoning context. Inf Fusion 17:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu C, Chang WJ, Xue M, Yang SL (2019) Multiple criteria group decision making with belief distributions and distributed preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 273(2):623–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Arteaga T, Alcantud JCR, Andrés Calle R (2016) A new consensus ranking approach for correlated ordinal information based on Mahalanobis distance. Inf Sci 372:546–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Pachón J, Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2014) How to combine inconsistent ordinal and cardinal preferences: a satisficing modelling approach. Comput Ind Eng 67:168–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinloopen E, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2004) Integration of ordinal and cardinal information in multi-criteria ranking with imperfect compensation. Eur J Oper Res 158:317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YS, Chang WC, Li WH, Lin ZL (2013) Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 229:462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen C, Schollmeyer G, Augustin T (2018) Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences. Int J Approx Reason 98:112–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien-Ramasso S, Mauris G, Valet L, Bolon Ph (2012) A decision support system for animated film selection based on a multi-criteria aggregation of referees’ ordinal preferences. Expert Syst Appl 39:4250–4257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid A, Beg I (2017) Incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(3):637–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koksalmis E, Kabak Ö (2019) Deriving decision makers’ weights in group decision making: an overview of objective methods. Inf Fusion 46:146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kułakowski K (2018) Inconsistency in the ordinal pairwise comparisons method with and without ties. Eur J Oper Res 270:314–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labella Á, Liu Y, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma R, Miettinen K, Salminen P (2003) Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Eur J Oper Res 147:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larichev OI (1992) Cognitive validity in design of decision-aiding techniques. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 1(3):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeneer ID, Pastijn H (2002) Selecting land mine detection strategies by means of outranking MCDM techniques. Eur J Oper Res 139:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu PD, Chen SM (2017) Group decision making based on heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2514–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HW, Wang GJ (2007) Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Eur J Oper Res 179(1):220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Zhou Q, Ding RX, Palomares I, Herrera F (2019) Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. Eur J Oper Res 275:737–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma LC (2016) A new group ranking approach for ordinal preferences based on group maximum consensus sequences. Eur J Oper Res 251:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó JM, Casanovas M, Yang JB (2014) Group decision making with expertons and uncertain generalized probabilistic weighted aggregation operators. Eur J Oper Res 235(1):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L (2004) Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Comput Oper Res 31:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morente-Molinera JA, Ríos-Aguilar S, González-Crespo R, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Dealing with group decision-making environments that have a high amount of alternatives using card-sorting techniques. Expert Syst Appl 127:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshkovich HM, Mechitov AI, Olson DL (2002) Ordinal judgments in multiattribute decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 137:625–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ölçer Aİ, Odabaşi AY (2005) A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to p ropulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem. Eur J Oper Res 166(1):93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014) MENTOR: a graphical monitoring tool of preferences evolution in large-scale group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 58:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2010) A mobile decision support system for dynamic group decision-making problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 40(6):1244–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems. Inf Sci 459:20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punkka A, Salo A (2013) Preference programming with incomplete ordinal information. Eur J Oper Res 231:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebai A, Aouni B, Martel J (2006) A multi-attribute method for choosing among potential alternatives with ordinal evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 174:360–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen F, Xu JP, Xu ZS (2015) An automatic ranking approach for multi-criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 14:311–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodenkamp MA, Tavana M, Di Caprio D (2018) An aggregation method for solving group multi-criteria decision-making problems with single-valued neutrosophic sets. Appl Soft Comput 71:715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2003) A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 18(7):837–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares LV (2012) An acyclic outranking model to support group decision making within organizations. Omega 40:782–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur RC (2011) Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method. Appl Math Comput 218:4295–4304

    Google Scholar 

  • Ureña R, Kou G, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks. Inf Sci 478:461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood MT (1972) Participation, influence, and satisfaction in group decision making. J Vocat Behav 2(4):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu DS (2009) Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 194:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Xiong RY, Chiclana F (2016) Uninorm trust propagation and aggregation methods for group decision making in social network with four tuple information. Knowl-Based Syst 96:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation. Knowl-Based Syst 122:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia M, Xu Z, Chen N (2013) Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decis Neg 22(2):259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Du ZJ, Chen XH, Cai CG (2019) Confidence consensus-based model for large-scale group decision making: a novel approach to managing non-cooperative behaviors. Inf Sci 477:410–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR (2016) Multicriteria decision making with ordinal/linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets for mobile apps. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24(3):590–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB (2001) Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 131:31–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JB, Xu DL (2013) Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination. Artif Intell 205:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao S (2018) A new distance-based consensus reaching model for multi-attribute group decision-making with linguistic distribution assessments. Int J Comput Intell Syst 12(1):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SZ, Mu ZM, Baležentis T (2018) A novel aggregation method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Fan ZP, Pan DH (1999) A ranking approach for interval numbers in uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems. Syst Eng Theory Pract 5:129–133 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2019) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):964–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018AAA0101705) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71622003, 71571060, 71690235, 71690230, and 71521001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Box 270, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Wenjun Chang, Chao Fu, Nanping Feng & Shanlin Yang

  2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Wenjun Chang, Chao Fu, Nanping Feng & Shanlin Yang

  3. Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Decision-Making & Information System Technologies, Hefei, 230009, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Wenjun Chang, Chao Fu, Nanping Feng & Shanlin Yang

Authors
  1. Wenjun Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chao Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nanping Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shanlin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Fu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1418 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, W., Fu, C., Feng, N. et al. Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments. Group Decis Negot 30, 1285–1314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09677-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09677-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation