Skip to main content
Log in

Aggregation of ordinal data using ordered weighted averaging operator weights

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In multi-criteria decision-making problems, ordinal data themselves provide a convenient instrument for articulating preferences but they impose some difficulty on the aggregation process since ambiguity prevails in the preference structure inherent in the ordinal data. One of the key concerns in the aggregation of ordinal data is to differentiate among the rank positions by reflecting decision-maker’s preferences. Since individual attitude is fairly different, it is presumable that each ranking position has different importance. In other words, the quantification schemes among the rank positions could vary depending on the individual preference structure. We find that, among others, the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator can help to take this concept into effect on several reasons. First, the OWA operator provides a means to take into account a discriminating factor by introducing the measure of attitudinal character. Second, it can produce appropriate ranking weights corresponding to each rank position by solving a mathematical program subject to the constraint of attitudinal character. To better understand the attitudinal character playing a role as a discriminating factor, we develop centered ranking weights from ordinal weak relations among the ranking positions and then investigate their properties to relate them with the OWA operator weights having the maximum entropy. Finally, we present a method for generating the OWA operator weights via rank-based weighting functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, B. S. (2006). On the properties of OWA operator weights functions with constant level of orness. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14, 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2010). A web-based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences. Information Sciences, 180, 4477–4495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. H., & Barret, B. E. (1996). Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Management Science, 42, 1515–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (1998). Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 97, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., & Alonso, S. (2007). Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 97, 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. H., Ahn, B. S., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Multicriteria group decision making under incomplete preference judgments: using fuzzy logic with a linguistic quantifier. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22, 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (1978). Priority ranking and consensus formation. Management Science, 24, 1721–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filev, D., & Yager, R. R. (1995). Analytic properties of maximum entropy OWA operators. Information Sciences, 85, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., & Herrera, F. (2007). A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15, 863–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdowne, Z. F. (1996). Ordinal ranking methods for multicriteria decision making. Naval Research Logistics, 43, 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., Zhou, L. G., & Chen, H. Y. (2010). Induced and linguistic generalized aggregation operators and their application in linguistic group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation. doi:10.1007/s10726-010-9225-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, M. (1990). A fuzzy neuron based on maximum entropy ordered weighted averaging. In Proc. 24th ann. Asilomar conf. on signals systems computers (pp. 618–623). Pacific Grove: IEEE and Maple Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerol, J. C., & Romero, S. B. (2000). Multicriterion decision in management: principles and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puerto, J., Marmol, A. M., Monloy, L., & Fernandez, F. R. (2000). Decision criteria with partial information. International Transactions in Operational Research, 7, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. S. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, W. G., Seaver, D. A., & Edwards, W. (1981). A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 28, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanino, T. (1990). On group decision making under fuzzy preferences. In J. Kacprzyk & M. Fedrizzi (Eds.), Multiperson decision making using fuzzy sets and possibility theory (pp. 172–185). Norwell: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1993). Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (1996). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11, 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R. (2007). Aggregation of ordinal information. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 6, 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. R., & Filev, D. P. (1999). Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part B, 29, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. S. (2004). Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 36, 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express our appreciation to anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier manuscript. The author (Byeong Seok Ahn) also would like to express deep appreciation to Young Soon Kwak for her helpful assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. S. Ahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahn, B.S., Choi, S.H. Aggregation of ordinal data using ordered weighted averaging operator weights. Ann Oper Res 201, 1–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1169-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1169-3

Keywords

Navigation