Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A conceptual framework is proposed that accounts for the role of emotions in shaping conflict behavior. The isomorphism between the characteristics that define and drive conflict and those that engender emotions makes it feasible to reconcile emotions with current conflict analysis techniques. Building on Damasio's somatic markers hypothesis, the concept of possibility facilitates modeling the effects of emotion on the scenarios apprehended by the decision makers. Attention is focused on two subsets of the conventional set of feasible states, the hiddenstates that are invisible because of existing emotions (usually negative), and the possiblestates that are invisible because of missing emotions (usually positive). These new concepts can be incorporated within the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. A model of the confrontation between the United States and North Korea over nuclear weapons demonstrates that the new concepts can simplify analysis and make new predictions that are consistent with the actual unfolding of events. Our main goals are to draw attention to the centrality of emotion in conflict and to the need for research on the incorporation of emotions into conflict analysis and resolution methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfred, K. G. (1999). “Anger and Retaliation: Toward an Understanding of Impassioned Conflict in Organizations,” {in} R. J. Bies, R. Y. Lewicki, and B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research in Negotiation in Organizations. Volume 7. Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2003, August 29). “N Korea Nuclear Talks Statement,” Retrieved February 2004, from http://news.bbc.co.Uk/l/hi/world/asia-pacific/3190495.stm.

  • Bennett, B. (2003, January 14). “Four Horrible Choices in North Korea,” RAND Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://www.rand.org/commentary/011403SDUT.html. This opinion article also appeared in the San Diego Union-Tribune on January 14, 2003.

  • Bennett, P. G. (1977). “Toward a Theory of Hypergames,” Omega 5(6), 749–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P. G. (1980). “Hypergames: Development a Model of Conflicts,” Futures 12(6), 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, P. G. and N. Howard. (1996). “Rationality, Emotion, and Preference Change: Drama-Theoretic Models of Choice,” European Journal of Operational Research 92, 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. (2003). The Six Dilemmas of Collaboration: Inter-organisational Relationships as Drama. Chichester, England: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1996). Conflict Resolution: Its Language and Processes. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T. and W. L. Gardner. (1999). “Emotion,” Annual Review Psychology 50, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P. and D. G. Pruitt. (1992). “Negotiation and Mediation,” Annual Review of Psychology 43, 531–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L. and K. Gasper. (2000). “Feeling is Believing: Some Affective Influences on Beliefs,” {in} N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, and S. Bem (Eds.), Emotion and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, R. R. (1996). The Science of Emotion: Research and Tradition in the Psychology of Emotions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eadie, W. F. and P. E. Nelson. (2001). The Language of Conflict and Resolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2005, February 10). “When the Partying has to Stop,” Retrieved February 2005, from http://www.economist.com/agenda/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=3651863.

  • Ekman, P. (1999). “Basic Emotions,” {in} T. Dalgleish and M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Sussex: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1999a). Strong Feelings: Emotions, Addiction, and Human Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1999b). Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel and D. M. Kilgour. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, D. M. Kilgour and X. Peng. (2003a). “A decision support system for interactive decision making – Part I: Model formulation,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part C 33, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, D. M. Kilgour and X. Peng. (2003b). “A decision support system for interactive decision making – Part II: Analysis and output interpretation,” IEEE Trans. Syst, Man, Cybern., Part C 33, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feffer, J. (2002, March 04). “Bush Policy Undermines Progress on Korean Peninsula,” Foreign Policy: In Focus 7(2). Retrieved August 10, 2003 from http://www.fpif.org.

  • Fink, S. (1986). Crisis Management: Planning for the Inevitable. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (1990). The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, J. P., M. S. Poole and R. K. Stutman. (1993). Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations. 2nd Ed., New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., and K. W. Hipel (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., A. S. R. Manstead and S. Bern. (2000). “The Influence of Emotions on Beliefs,” {in} N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, and S. Bern (Eds.), Emotion and Beliefs: How Feeling Influence Thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. and B. Mesquita. (2000). “Beliefs through Emotions,” {in} N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, and S. Bern (Eds.), Emotion and Beliefs: How Feeling Influence Thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R. (2001). “Conflict Negotiation under Crisis Conditions,” {in} W. Eadie and P. Nelson (Eds.), The Language of Conflict and Resolution. Thousands Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel, K. W. (Ed.). (2002). “Conflict Resolution,” in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Oxford: EOLSS Publishers [http://www.eolss.net].

  • Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., and Peng, J., (1997). “The Decision Support System GMCR in Environmental Conflict Management,” Applied Mathematics and Computation 83(2 & 3), 117–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1999). Confrontation Analysis: How to Win Operations Other Than War. Pentagon, Washington DC: CCRP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N., P. Bennett, J. Bryant and M. Bradley. (1992). “Manifesto for a Theory of Drama and Irrational Choice,” Journal of the Operational Research Society 44, 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1977). Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1993). “Four Systems for Emotion Activation: Cognitive and Noncognitive Processes,” Psychological Review 100(1), 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S. and A. Bodtker. (2001). “Mediating with Heart in Mind: Addressing Emotion in Mediation Practice,” Negotiation Journal 17(3), 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KCNA. (2003, August 30). “Keynote Speeches Made at Six-Way Talks,” Retrieved February 2004, from http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2003/200308/news08/30.htm#6.

  • Laney, J. T, and Shaplen, J. T. (2003, March/April). “How to Deal with North Korea,” Foreign Affairs. Retrieved August 10, 2003, from http://www.foreignaffairs.org/.

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2001). “Relational Meaning and Discrete Emotions,” in K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, A., and T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal Processes in Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. and B. N. Lazarus. (1994). Passion and Reason: Making Sense of our Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S. and D. Keltner. (2000). “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice,” Cognition and Emotion 14(4), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S and D. Keltner. (2001). “Fear, Anger, and Risk,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18(1), 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G. F., E. U. Weber, C. K. Hsee and N. Welch. (2001). “Risk as Feelings,” Psychological Bulletin 127(2), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and H. Raiffa. (1957). Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J. N. and R. Taplin. (1987). Conflict and Conflict Resolution: A Sociological Introduction with Updated Bibliography and Theory Section. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (2002). Negotiation Analysis: The Art and Science of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J. (2001). “A Model of Appraisal in the Emotion System: Integrating Theory, Research, and Application,” in K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal Processes in Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. Z., D. G. Pruitt and D. H. Kim. (1994). Social Conflicts: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 2nd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandole, D. J. D. (1998). “A Comprehensive Mapping of Conflict and Conflict Resolution: A Three-Pillar Approach,” Peace and Conflict Studies 5(2), 1–31. Retrieved on June 4, 2003, from http://www.gmu.edu/academic/pcs/sandole.htm.

  • Scherer, K. R. (2001). “Appraisal Considered as a Process of Multilevel Sequential Checking,” {in} K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr and T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal Processes in Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1976). “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality,” {in} H. Simon (Ed.), Models of Bounded Rationality (1982). Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

  • The White House (2002, September). “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America,” Retrieved August 10, 2003, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html.

  • Thompson, L. (1998). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillett, G. (1991). Resolving Conflict: A Practical Approach. South Melbourne, Australia: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern. (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 3rd edn., Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., K. W. Hipel and N. M. Fraser. (1988). “Modeling Misperception in Games,” Behavioral Science 33(3), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L3G1, Canada

    Amer Obeidi & Keith W. Hipel

  2. Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L3C5, Canada

    D. Marc Kilgour

Authors
  1. Amer Obeidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith W. Hipel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Marc Kilgour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith W. Hipel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obeidi, A., Hipel, K.W. & Kilgour, D.M. The Role of Emotions in Envisioning Outcomes in Conflict Analysis. Group Decis Negot 14, 481–500 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-9004-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-9004-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation