Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concern for the role of emotion in argumentative encounters has rested upon the concept of emotion as arguments, emotions to obtain the adherence of the audience and reflect the virtues of a good arguer. In this paper, we focus on understanding emotion and argumentation based on cognitive approaches that identify the relationship between the two elements, to propose the use of emotion regulation strategies in deliberative dialogue. Bearing in mind that the intensity of emotional responses may, in some cases, hamper one’s capacity to solve problems during a practical argument, we suggest that the use of emotion regulation strategies may favor deliberative dialogue, leading to more adaptive emotional responses and, in turn, better argumentative encounters, rendering decision-making more efficient. This article conceptualizes argumentation, revealing the historical path of emotion in studies on argumentation. It presents the concepts of emotion and emotion regulation, followed by the function of emotion regulation in argumentative encounters, illustrating this in two different situations. We conclude with the contribution made by the use of strategies for emotion regulation during deliberative dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberdein, A., and D.H. Cohen. 2016. Introduction: Virtues and arguments. Topoi 35 (2): 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9366-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2006. On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse, 2nd ed. Trans. G.A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Audi, R. 2015. Reasons, rights and values, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G.H., and P.R. Cohen. 1982. emotion influences in memory and thinking: Data and theory. In Affect and cognition, ed. M.S. Clark and S.T. Fiske, 291–331. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, P. 2007. Argumenter en situation difficile, Non Classe ed. Paris: La Decouverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camras, L.A., and S.S. Fatani. 2008. The development of facial expressions: Current perspectives on infant emotions. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 291–303. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. 2004. Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion 4 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S., and T.L. White. 1994. behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (2): 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., S.R. Chamberlain, and B.J. Sahakian. 2009. Neurocognitive mechanisms in depression: Implications for treatment. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32: 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.L., and A. Ortony. 2000. Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never? In cognitive neuroscience of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.L., and A. Ortony. 2008. Appraisal theories: How cognition shapes affect into emotion. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 628–643. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carvalho, M.R., M. Rozenthal, and A.E. Nardi. 2010. The fear circuitry in panic disorder and its modulation by cognitive-behavior therapy interventions. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 11 (2): 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622970903178176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRubeis, R.J., G.J. Siegle, and S.D. Hollon. 2008. Cognitive therapy versus medication for depression: Treatment, outcomes and neural mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 (10): 788–796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F.H.V., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed, n ed. Dordrecht: Foris Pubns USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, Van F.H., B. Garssen, E.C. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkmans, B. Verheij, and J.H. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion 6 (3–4): 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., and R.J. Davidson. 1994. The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman and Friesen. 2003. Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotion from facial expressions. Los Altos: Malor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N.H. 2008. The psychologists’ point of view. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 68–87. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M.A. 1997. Coalescent argumentation. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M.A. 2004. Emotion and the Pragma-Dialectic Model. In The practice of argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren and P. Houstlosser. Holland: Walter Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, J. 2017. ¿Qué es la argumentación práctica? In Coherencia: Revista de humanidades. Medellín: Universidad EAFIT 27 (14): 215–243. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.14.27.9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. 2000. Emociones: Una guía interna. Bilbao: Desclee de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L.S. 2008. The clinical application of emotion in psychotherapy. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 88–101. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J.J. 2008. Emotion regulation. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 497–512. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J.J., and R.A. Thompson. 2007. Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In Handbook of emotion regulation, ed. J.J. Gross, 3–26. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J.J., J.M. Richards, and O.P. John. 2006. Emotion regulation in everyday life. In Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health, ed. D.K. Snyder, J. Simpson, and J.N. Hughes, 13–35. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Innocenti-Manolescu, B. 2006. A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation. Argumentation 20: 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9016-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A.M. 2008. Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 548–573. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joorman, J., K.L. Yoon, and M. Siemer. 2010. Cognition and emotion regulation. In Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment, ed. A.M. Kring and D.M. Sloan, 174–203. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. 1990. Categories and cognitive models. In Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, 5–153. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff, G. 1996. The political mind: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. 2006. Thinking points: A progressist handbook: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giraux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larraín, A., and A. Haye. 2012. The role of rhetoric in a dialogical approach to thinking. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 42 (2): 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. 1999. Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux, J.E. 2000. Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23 (1): 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. 2008a. The emergence of human emotion. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 68–87. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. 2008b. The emergence of human emotion. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 304–319. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. 2008c. The emergence of human emotion. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 742–756. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. 2007. Affect regulation and affective forecasting. In Handbook of emotion regulation, ed. J.J. Gross, 180–203. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2013. Emotive language in argumentation, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medrano, L.A., R. Muñoz-Navarro, and A. Cano-Vindel. 2016. Procesos cognitivos y regulación emocional: Aportes desde una aproximación psicoevolucionista. Ansiedad y Estrés 22 (2–3): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2016.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. 2009. Principia rhetorica: Une théorie générale de l’argumentation, FAYARD ed. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. A new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M., and T. Dalgleish. 2008. Part 1: Philosophy and theory. In Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Roffman, J.L., C.D. Marci, D.M. Glick, D.D. Dougherty, and S.L. Rauch. 2005. Neuroimaging and the functional neuroanatomy of psychotherapy. Psychological Medicine 35 (10): 1385–1398. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291705005064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I.J. 2001. A model of appraisal in emotion system: Integrating theory, research and applications. In Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, 68–91. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Solomon, R.C. 2008. The philosophy of emotions. In Handbook of emotions, ed. M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barret, 3–16. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, C.W. 2015. The philosophy of argument and audience reception. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, C.W. 2017. Retórica y teoría de la argumentación contemporáneas: Ensayos escogidos de christopher tindale. Medellín: Editorial EAFIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.E. 2007. Los usos de la argumentación. Barcelona: Peninsula.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. 2015. Goal-based reasoning for argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D., and E.C. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, K., and J.J. Gross. 2010. Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A conceptual framework. In Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment, ed. A.M. Kring and D.M. Sloan, 13–37. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela González González.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González González, M., Gómez, J. & Lemos, M. Theoretical Considerations for the Articulation of Emotion and Argumentation in the Arguer: A Proposal for Emotion Regulation in Deliberation. Argumentation 33, 349–364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-09476-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-09476-6

Keywords

Navigation