Introduction

Cuttings prepared from mung bean seedlings have been used as a model to examine adventitious root formation and in bioassays to identify putative rooting-promoting substances (Arthur et al. 2004; De Klerk 1999; Kollarova et al. 2005; Mutui et al. 2005; Ricci et al. 2005). Major advantages of mung bean cuttings concern their convenience: seeds are available in large numbers, cuttings can be prepared ca. 7 days after sowing by excision of the roots, and the number of adventitious roots can be scored 10 days after the start of the rooting treatment.

Ethylene has been implicated in adventitious root formation but its role is unclear. With mung bean cuttings, researchers have obtained contradictory results: it has been reported that in mung bean ethylene promotes, inhibits, or does not influence rooting (see Mudge 1988). Contradictory results have also been obtained in, e.g., tomato (see Clark et al. 1999). In studies on the role of ethylene during rooting, various pitfalls should be considered (cf. De Klerk et al. 1999). First, cuttings may themselves produce large amounts of ethylene in response to the auxin treatment (for mung bean cuttings: Geneve and Heuser 1982). In mung bean it has also been found that genes involved in ethylene synthesis, are upregulated by auxin (Song et al. 2005). Second, in the portion of the stem from where the roots regenerate, ethylene may be trapped when this portion is immersed: because gases do not diffuse easily through water, ethylene may accumulate to high levels in immersed tissues (Jackson 1985). Third, the effect of ethylene is stage-specific and depends on the phase of the rooting treatment (De Klerk et al. 1999).

In the present article, we examine the role of ethylene in mung bean, focusing on the effect of ethylene synthesis brought about by auxin, and on the putative differential effect of ethylene during the successive phases of root formation. Because an adequate measurement of ethylene in the tissue from where the roots regenerate is difficult (see Discussion), the role of enhancement of ethylene synthesis by auxin has been evaluated using STS (an ethylene inhibitor) and ACC (a direct precursor of ethylene).

Materials and methods

Plant material

Mung bean seeds were purchased from Zaadhandel Van Der Wal, Hoogeveen, The Netherlands. Two batches of seeds were used. We noticed differences among these batches, e.g., with respect to the optimal NAA concentration. The seeds were surface-sterilized in 1% (w/v) NaOC1, rinsed three times in sterile water and sown in culture tubes (2.2 cm diameter, 15 cm high) with 5 ml medium (one seed per tube). The medium was composed of MS macro- and microelements (Murashige and Skoog 1962) and 6 g l−1 agar (brand: Becton and Dickinson). After 7–9 days of germination at 25°C at a light intensity of 30 μE m−2 s−1 (Philips TL 33) for 16 h per day, cuttings were prepared by excising the primary root. Each cutting consisted of a 3-cm long hypocotyl, the cotyledons, the epicotyl, two primary leaves and the unexpanded apical bud.

Rooting conditions

The cuttings were cultured in tubes (2.2 cm diameter, 15 cm high) with 5 ml semi-solid medium and with a loose lid so that gases could escape easily. The medium was the same as the rooting medium used for apple microcuttings (De Klerk et al. 1995). NAA was added before autoclaving, and filter-sterilized ACC, AVG and STS after autoclaving. The cuttings were stuck in the medium for 2 cm. The cultures were kept at 25°C in the dark for five days. Then, the cuttings were transferred to the same medium but without plant growth regulators and to the light (16-h photoperiod; 35 μmol m2 s−1). An exception is the experiment shown in Fig. 4. In this experiment, the cuttings were transferred to hormone-free medium and to the light after 7 days (168 h). When the plant growth regulators were added as a pulse, the cuttings were transferred for the period of the pulse to medium with 100 μM STS (Fig. 4) or 300 μM ACC (Figs. 5 and 6) and after that transferred back to the previous medium. During the pulses, NAA was present in the medium at the proper concentration. The roots regenerated from the lower 1 cm of the cutting. In the pulse-experiment shown in Fig. 6, the cuttings were cultured during the first day (0–24 h) in the dark on medium with or without 300 μM ACC and with increasing concentrations of NAA, during the following 4d (24–120 h) on medium with the same concentrations of NAA (but without ACC), and after that transferred to the light and to hormone-free medium. Roots were counted after 11 or 12 days under a dissecting microscope.

Statistics

For each treatment, 30 cuttings were used. The means are given ±SE. Significance of differences was evaluated in a Student t-test.

Results

Interactive effects of NAA, STS and ACC

Mung bean cuttings were cultured for 5 days with increasing concentrations of NAA in absence or presence of 10 μM STS and then transferred to medium without plant growth regulators. At low NAA concentrations (0 and 10 μM), 10 μM STS had no effect, but at high NAA concentrations, in particular at 100 μM NAA, 10 μM STS promoted rooting (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of increasing concentrations of NAA on rooting of mung bean cuttings with and without 10 μM STS

Cuttings were also treated with a range of STS concentrations at the optimal (30 μM) and at a supraoptimal NAA concentration (100 μM). The effect of an increase of NAA from 30 to 100 μM depended on the STS concentration. At low or high STS-levels, the increase of NAA resulted in less or more roots, respectively (Fig. 2). There was no toxic effect of STS: even at the highest concentration, 100 μM, the cuttings looked normal and only displayed reduced root formation. It should be remembered that the cuttings were cultured with STS for only 5 days. A similar experiment, but with only few, selected concentrations, was done with the ethylene-synthesis inhibitor AVG. We obtained essentially the same results.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of increasing concentrations of STS on rooting of mung bean cuttings in the presence of 30 μM NAA (optimal concentration) or 100 μM NAA (supraoptimal concentration)

Cuttings were also treated with a range of ACC concentrations at a high (10 μM) and at a low (3 μM) NAA concentration. The increase of NAA resulted in more roots or less roots at low or high ACC-levels, respectively. Generally, opposite shifts of the dose-response curves at high and low NAA concentration were observed for ACC and STS: The dose-response curves of ACC with 10 μM NAA had shifted to the left as compared to the dose-response curve with 3 μM NAA (Fig. 3). The dose-response curves of STS with 100 μM NAA had shifted to the right as compared to the dose-response curve with 30 μM NAA (Fig. 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of increasing concentrations of ACC on rooting of mung bean cuttings in the presence of 3 μM NAA (low suboptimal concentration) or 10 μM NAA (suboptimal concentration)

Stage-dependent effect of ethylene

In apple microcuttings, we previously found a strong stage-dependent effect of ethylene by giving 24 h pulses with either STS or ACC (De Klerk et al. 1999). Similar experiments were carried out in mung bean. At 30 μM NAA (Fig. 4a), 24 h STS-pulses were inhibitory when administered at the beginning of the rooting treatment (from 0 to 48 h). Later on (96–120 h), STS-pulses were slightly promotive. At the supraoptimal auxin concentration (100 μM NAA, Fig. 4b), STS-pulses had no effect up to 48 h. After that, STS-pulses were strongly promotive up to 144 h. Together, these data indicate that ethylene is promotive in the first days of the rooting treatment, but inhibitory after that.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of 24-h pulses with 100 μM STS on rooting of mung bean cuttings. Rooting was carried out at 30 μM NAA (optimal concentration) (a) or at 100 μM NAA (supraoptimal concentration) (b). During the STS pulse, NAA was also present

From pulses with ACC we reached a similar conclusion about the stage-dependent effect of ethylene: ACC was stimulatory just after taking the cutting in particular at the low auxin concentration (Fig. 5a). Later on (72–120 h), ACC was inhibitory at the high auxin concentration (Fig. 5b). It should be noted that in this experiment, 100 μM NAA induced a higher number of roots than 30 μM NAA, the concentration that was optimal in the other experiments.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of 24-h pulses with 300 μM ACC on rooting of mung bean cuttings. Rooting was carried out at 30 μM NAA (optimal concentration) (a) or at 100 μM NAA (supraoptimal concentration) (b). During the ACC pulse, NAA was also present

We were interested how ethylene promoted rooting during the initial phase. Therefore, we gave a 24-h pulse with ACC during the initial day just after taking the cutting. Both during the pulse and in the four days after the pulse a range of NAA concentrations was applied. Figure 6 shows that the ACC treatment stimulated rooting at all auxin concentrations. The dose-response curve of NAA did not shift to left or right by the one-day ACC treatment. In this experiment, the same batch of seeds was used as in the experiment shown in Fig. 5. Note that 100 μM NAA resulted in the highest number of roots (compare with Figs. 1 and 5).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of a pretreatment with ACC on rooting of mung bean cuttings. The cuttings had been cultured during the first day (0–24 h) with and without 300 μM ACC and after that for 4 days (24–120 h) on medium with increasing NAA concentrations

Discussion

The effects of applied ACC and STS depend on the auxin concentration

It is well known that auxin promotes ethylene formation. This has also been reported for mung bean cuttings (Geneve and Heuser 1982; Song et al. 2005). We have measured ethylene levels in the head space of taped culture containers and found a strong increase of ethylene when NAA had been added to the medium (data not shown). However, the ethylene level should be measured in the tissue from where the roots regenerate, viz., in the part of the stem that is immersed in the medium. In this portion of the cutting, the ethylene level is expectedly much higher because the auxin concentration in the lower part of the shoot is higher (e.g., De Klerk et al. 1990) and because ethylene cannot easily escape from immersed tissues (cf. Voesenek et al. 1993). Actually, the situation is more complicated, since oxidation of ACC (a precursor of ethylene that is rapidly converted to ethylene in plant tissues by ACC-oxidase) to ethylene is also reduced by the partial anaerobic conditions in the immersed portion of the cutting (cf. Voesenek et al. 1993). Measurements of ethylene in the relevant portion of the cutting are feasible but complicated and were therefore not performed. Nevertheless, a critical study on endogenous ethylene levels in the shoot is necessary to further substantiate the conclusions of this paper.

The effect of added NAA on ethylene production in mung bean is shown in this paper by the opposite effect of an increase of NAA at high and low levels of STS (an inhibitor of ethylene action, Fig. 2) and ACC (the direct precursor of ethylene in the biosynthetic pathway, Fig. 3). At low STS- and high ACC-levels, an increase of NAA resulted in reduced rooting. In agreement with this, at high STS and low ACC-levels an increase of NAA resulted in enhanced rooting. This indicates that at high NAA concentrations, ethylene synthesis in the cuttings was high and that ethylene became inhibitory; at low NAA concentration, the level of endogenous ethylene was suboptimal. In Fig. 1, dose-response curves of NAA are shown with and without 10 μM STS. Ten μM STS promoted rooting only at high NAA concentrations, in particular at 100 μM NAA (Fig. 2). This again indicates that ethylene endogenously produced at 100 μM NAA, inhibited rooting. Results with inhibitors like STS should be treated with care because of possible, unexpected side-effects. In this study, the effect of STS is most likely related to inhibition of ethylene action because AVG, an inhibitor of ethylene synthesis, had similar results and because addition of ACC, a compound that is readily metabolized to ethylene, gave just opposite results.

Stage dependent effect of ethylene

Just as other regeneration processes (Christianson and Warnick 1983; De Klerk et al. 1995; De Klerk 1999), adventitious root formation can be dissected into three phases. First, certain cells develop competence to respond to the rhizogenic signal (auxin). This is denoted as dedifferentiation phase. In the next phase, the induction phase, these cells become determined to form roots by the rhizogenic action of auxin. After that, morphological differentiation occurs during which the roots develop. During this third phase auxin is inhibitory. Previously (De Klerk et al. 1999), we have shown in apple microcuttings that ethylene is promotive during the first phase, but inhibitory during the second. The present data indicate the same phase-dependent effect of ethylene in mung bean cuttings: ethylene is at first promotive (as shown by the promotion of rooting by ACC-pulses and the inhibition by STS-pulses) and after that inhibitory (ACC-pulses inhibit and STS-pulses promote rooting). When ACC or STS are present for the full treatment, the resulting effect of the opposite actions in the subsequent phases depends among others on how much of the compound (ACC or STS) is still left in the medium.

The mechanism how ethylene enhances rooting during the initial phase has been elucidated to some extent. Application of ACC during the initial day only increased rooting at all NAA concentrations in a dose-response curve of NAA. Thus, more cells in the cutting had become capable to respond to the rhizogenic action of auxin. In flooded plants, ethylene accumulation increases sensitivity to auxin and results in adventitious root formation (Visser et al. 1996). In transgenic plants that have been rendered insensitive towards ethylene, rooting is reduced (Clark et al. 1999; McDonald and Visser 2003).

During the induction phase (second phase) of rooting in apple, the root meristemoid is being formed. This involves the establishment of polarity. Polar auxin transport might play a major role in the establishment of the polarity. Because ethylene blocks polar auxin transport (Suttle 1988), it might be that it inhibits during the induction phase by interfering with the establishment of polarity. Indeed, another compound that interferes with the polar auxin transport, triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA), also blocks rooting in the same period (G. J. de Klerk unpublished results). Inhibition of organized growth by ethylene has been reported before (Wochok and Wetherel 1971).

Conclusions

Papers on the effect of ethylene on rooting have reported contradictory results. The present paper shows that the relationship between ethylene and rooting is multifaceted. (1) Ethylene has opposite effects in the successive phases of rooting, being promotive during the initial stage and inhibitory after that. (2) The direction of the effect of added ethylene or ethylene inhibitors depends on the endogenous content that in turn depends on auxin concentration in the medium and on the extent of immersion. (3) It should also be considered, that ethylene readily escapes from tissues as it is a gaseous compound, but that escape from immersed tissues is much reduced.