Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of genetic diversity among European and Asian fig varieties (Ficus carica L.) using ISSR, RAPD, and SSR markers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nineteen fig varieties and lines from Europe and Asia have been fingerprinted by ISSR, RAPD, and SSR markers, respectively, using 13, 19, and 13 primer combinations. All primers produced 258 loci, with the highest number of loci (119) generated by RAPD (R p: 48.42). Clustering analysis was applied to the three marker datasets to elucidate the genetic structure and relationships among these varieties. Mean genetic similarities were 0.787, 0.717, and 0.749, respectively, as determined using ISSR, RAPD, and SSR. Each marker system produced incompletely separated clusters, although a weak binding group based on race type appeared in the combined dataset. Comparisons of coefficients revealed no correlation between different similarity matrices; congruence was observed between similarity matrices and co-phenetic matrices in all markers. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that most of the total polymorphism was attributable to within-group variance (ISSRs + RAPDs, 97.41%; SSRs, 90.18%). These results suggest that the genetic diversity of this fig population is low and that multiple marker utilization is critical to estimate the relatedness of figs at the variety level. Additionally, it was presumed that ‘Houraihi’, the oldest variety in Japan, was disseminated independently of other foreign varieties in the 17th century or before then.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksoy U (1998) Why fig? An old taste and a new perspective. Acta Hortic 480:25–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn M, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic similarities among winter wheat cultivars determined on the basis of RFLPs, AFLPs and SSRs and their use for predicting progeny variance. Crop Sci 39:228–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrita LF, Aksoy U, Hepaksoy S, Leitao JM (2001) Suitability of isozyme, RAPD and AFLP markers to assess genetic differences and relatedness among fig (Ficus carica L.) clones. Sci Hortic 87:261–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Condit IJ (1947) The fig. Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • De Masi L, Castaldo D, Galano G, Minasi P, Laratta B (2005) Genotyping of fig (Ficus carica L.) via RAPD markers. J Sci Food Agric 85:2235–2242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JE, Lewis RV, Wilkinson MJ, Caligari PDS (1999) Developing an appropriate strategy to assess genetic variability in plant germplasm collections. Theor Appl Genet 98:1125–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo E, Viruel MA, Lopez-Corrales M, Hormaza JI (2005) Characterisation and cross-species transferability of microsatellites in the common fig (Ficus carica L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80:217–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IBPGR (1986) Genetic resources of tropical and sub-tropical fruits and nuts. IBPGR Rome, pp 63–69

  • Jones DA (1972) Blood samples: probability of discrimination. J Forensic Sci Soc 12:355–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khadari B, Hochu I, Satoni S, Kjellberg F (2001) Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in the common fig (Ficus carica L.) and representative species of the genus Ficus. Mol Ecol Notes 1:191–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khadari B, Ater M, Mamouni A, Roger JP, Kjellberg F (2004) Molecular characterization of Moroccan fig germplasm using inter simple sequence repeat and simple sequence repeat markers to establish a reference collection. HortScience 40(1):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadari B, Grout C, Santoni S, Kjellberg F (2005) Contrasted genetic diversity and differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Ficus carica L.: a study using mtDNA RFLP. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:97–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshbakht K, Hammer K (2006) Savadkouh (Iran) – an evolutionary center for fruit trees and shrubs. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamboy WF, Alpha CG (1998) Using simple sequence repeats (SSRs) for DNA fingerprinting germplasm accessions of grape (Vitis L.) species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:182–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetical variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5267–5273

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou K, Ehaliotis C, Tourna M, Kastanis P, Karydis I, Zervakis G (2002) Genetic relatedness among dioecious Ficus carica L. cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and evaluation of agronomic and morphological characters. Genetica 114:183–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G et al (1998) Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 97:1248–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S et al (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (2006) NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Ver. 2.2, Exeter Software, NY

  • Sadder MT, Ateyyeh AF (2006) Molecular assessment of polymorphism among local Jordanian genotypes of common fig (Ficus carica L.). Sci Hortic Amsterdam 107:347–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salhi-Hannachi A, Trifi M, Zehdi S, Hedhi J, Mars M, Rhouma A et al (2004) Inter simple sequence repeat fingerprints to access genetic diversity in Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) germplasm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 51:269–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salhi-Hannachi A, Chatti K, Mars M, Marrakchi M, Trifi M (2005) Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in two Tunisian collections of fig cultivars based on random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter simple sequence repeats fingerprints. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:563–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal D, Raina SN (2005) Genotyping safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars by DNA fingerprints. Euphytica 146:67–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storey WB et al (1975) Figs. In: Janick J, Moore J (eds) Advances in fruit breeding. Purdue University Press, Indiana, pp 568–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukovskij PM (1950) Ficus. Cultivated plants and their wild relatives. State Publishing House Sov Sci Mosc 1950:58–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Dr. Tanisaka for the critical reading of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidetoshi Ikegami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ikegami, H., Nogata, H., Hirashima, K. et al. Analysis of genetic diversity among European and Asian fig varieties (Ficus carica L.) using ISSR, RAPD, and SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56, 201–209 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9355-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9355-5

Keywords

Navigation