Skip to main content
Log in

Identification and detection of genetic relatedness among important varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the cool season legume crops grown in India and the Indian sub-continent, peas are very popular and preferred by the growers as well as consumers for various uses. The third largest area in pea cultivation is occupied by India after Canada and Russia. Among the important and popular varieties of peas that are grown in India, several are from exotic background. But very little work has been done to carry out the genetic diversity present in the widely adapted Indian pea varieties using DNA markers. Twenty-four most popular and widely adapted varieties were subjected to RAPD analysis to find out the genetic relatedness among them using 60 decamer primers. All the primers used in our study were found to be polymorphic and seven of them showed 100% polymorphism. Out of 579 amplified products, 433 showed polymorphism (74.8%). On an average, 9.65 bands were amplified per primer. Cluster analysis based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficient using UPGMA grouped all the tall type varieties together, whereas, dwarf types formed two different clusters based upon their pedigree. The arithmetic mean heterozygosity (H av) value and marker index (MI) was found to be 0.496 and 4.787, respectively, thus this indicated the efficiency of RAPD as a marker system. Moreover, the calculated value of probability of identical match by chance suggested that about 1053 genotypes can be unambiguously distinguish by employing 60 RAPD primers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad F (1999) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis reveals genetic relationships among the annual Cicer species. Theor Appl Genet 98:657–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranger A, Aubert G, Arnau G, Laine AL, Deniot G, Potier J, Weinachter C, Lejeune-Henaut I, Lallemand J, Burstin J (2004) Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using protein- and PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 108:1309–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Scoles G, Hucl P, Chibbar RN (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of five morphological groups of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) based on RAPD analysis. Genome 43:724–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dangi RS, Lagu MD, Choudhary LB, Ranjekar PK, Gupta VS (2004) Assessment of genetic diversity in Trigonella foenum–graecum and Trigonella caerulea using ISSR and RAPD markers. BMC Plant Biol 4:13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemant P, Laurence MD (1992) Isolation of Plant DNA: afast, inexpensive, and reliable method. Plant Mol Biol Rep 10:60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Huh MK, Huh HW (2001) Genetic diversity and population structure of wild tare lentil. Crop Sci 41:1940–1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Edwards K, Bruford M, Vosman B, Morgante M, Seberg O, Kremer A, Boursot P, Arctander P, Tautz D, Hewitt G (1997) Newer molecular technologies for biodiversity evaluation: opportunities and challenges. Nat Biotechnol 15:625–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan TN, Dixit GP (2001) Breeding field peas in India and Australia. Indian J Pulses Res 14:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhanpaul S, Chadha S, Bhat KV (2000) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis in Indian mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) cultivars. Genetica 109:227–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marx GA (1977) Classification, genetics and breeding. In: Sutcliffe JF, Pate JS (eds) The physiology of the garden pea. Academic Press, London, pp 21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 83:583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquet RS (2002) Allozyme diversity of cultivated cowpea, Vigna unguiculata. Theor Appl Genet 101:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pejic I, Ajmone-Marson P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G, Motto M (1998) Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 97:1248–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petterson DS, Sipsas S, Mackintosh JB (1997) The chemical composition and nutritive value of Australian grain legumes, 2nd edn. Grain Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Voges J, Tingey S, Rafalski A (1996) A comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakishana W, Lagu MD, Gupta VS, Ranjekar PK (1994) DNA fingerprinting in rice using oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repetitive DNA sequence. Theor Appl Genet 88:402–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray Choudhury P, Kohli S, Srinivasan K, Mohapatra T, Sharma RP (2001) Identification and classification of aromatic rices based on DNA fingerprinting. Euphytica 118:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1992) NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 1.70. Applied Biostatistics, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland I, Mason M, Pritchard I, French R (1994) Effect of field peas and wheat on the yield and protein of subsequent wheat crops grown at several rates of applied nitrogen. Aus J Expt Agric 34:641–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simioniuc D, Uptmoor R, Friedt W, Ordon F (2002) Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPDs and AFLPs. Plant Breed 121:429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tar’an B, Zhang C, WarKentin T, Tullu A, Vanderberg A (2005) Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on molecular markers, and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48:257–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Virk PS, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jackson MT, Newbury HJ (1995) Use of RAPD for the study of diversity within plant germplasm collections. Heredity 74:170–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolko B, Swiecicki WK, Kruszka K, Irzykowska L (2000) Isozyme and RAPD markers for the identification of pea, field bean and lupin cultivars. J Appl Genet 41:151–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap IV, Nelson R (1995) WinBoot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 14, IRRI, Los Banas, Philippines

  • Yee E, Kidwell KK, Sills GR, Lumpkin TA (1999) Diversity among selected Vigna angularis (azuki) accessions on the basis of RAPD and AFLP markers. Crop Sci 39:268–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Li-Qiong L, Huan L, Jie B, Man-Ye Y, Chen M, Ying-Fan C, Xiao-Lin Q, Fang C (2002) RAPD markers in diversity detection and variety identification of Tibetan hulless barley. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20:369–377

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Dr. Masood Ali, Director, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India for his consistent encouragement and guidance. Authors are also thankful to Dr. Naimuddin, Scientist, IIPR, Kanpur for providing help during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Ray Choudhury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choudhury, P.R., Tanveer, H. & Dixit, G.P. Identification and detection of genetic relatedness among important varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown in India. Genetica 130, 183–191 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-006-9005-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-006-9005-9

Keywords

Navigation