Skip to main content
Log in

Behaviour of Backfill Undergoing Cementation Under Cyclic Loading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cemented paste backfill (CPB), a man-made soil undergoing cementation, is extensively applied to support underground mine openings or spaces and provide regional ground stability. The large underground cavities created by the ore extraction are backfilled with the tailings (fine-grained soils) mixed with cement and water in the form of CPB. Cyclic loading-induced liquefaction potential of CPB structures is a crucial concern in underground mine workplaces and backfilling operations. Failures of CPB structures can cause loss of life and/or serious injuries and have significant financial ramifications for a mine. However, no studies have used the shaking table testing method to address the cyclic and liquefaction response of CPB undergoing hydration. This research highlights new findings of using a shaking table to understand the effect of the progress of cement hydration (curing time) on the geotechnical response of hydrating CPB during dynamic loading events. CPB blends were produced, casted into a flexible laminar shear box and kept for curing to different maturity ages. Various factors (e.g., horizontal and vertical deformation, development of excess pore water pressure, temperature, electrical conductivity, acceleration, effective stress) were monitored before, during, and after shaking. Microstructural evolution of CPB was also studied. Cyclic loading was applied using a 1-D shaking table. The findings indicate that the maturity age or the cement hydration development and the depth in the CPB have a significant influence on the acceleration and excess pore water pressure (PWP), as well as on the horizontal and vertical deformation of the CPB when subjected to cyclic loading. It is also found that the cyclic loading has an insignificant effect on the progress of the cementation hydration. Furthermore, young (2.5 h old) CPB material can be susceptible to liquefaction, whereas older CPBs (curing time ≥ 4 h) are resistant to liquefaction under the studied cyclic conditions. These results provide a better comprehension of cyclic behavior of natural or man-made soil undergoing cementation and the efficient and safer design of CPB structures. This will contribute to increase the safety of the underground mine openings and workplaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data and materials or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

References

  • Abdul-Hussain N, Fall M (2012) Thermo-hydro-mechanical behaviour of sodium silicate-cemented paste tailings in column experiments. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 29:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar YB, El-Tahir ETA (1986) Low strain dynamic properties of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Eng 112(11):1001–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alainachi I, Fall M (2021a) Chemically induced changes in the geotechnical response of cementing paste backfill in shaking table test. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13:513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alainachi, I., Fall, M. (2021b). Temperature induced changes in the behaviour of cementing fine-grained soils under dynamic loadings. Geomech Geoeng, 1–19.

  • Aldhafeeri Z, Fall M (2016) Time and damage induced changes in the chemical reactivity of cemented paste backfill. J Environ Chem Eng 4(4):4038–4049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Georgarakos T, Georgiannou V, Drosos V, Kourkoulis R (2010) Seismic performance of bar-mat reinforced-soil retaining wall: shaking table testing versus numerical analysis with modified kinematic hardening constitutive model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(10):1089–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C143/C143M-15a (2015). “Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete,”

  • Atkinson GM, Kaka SI, Eaton D, Bent A, Peci V, Halchuk S (2008) A very close look at a moderate earthquake near Sudbury, Ontario. Seismol Res Lett 79(1):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairro R and Vaz C (2000) Shaking table testing of civil engineering structures-The LNEC 3D simulator experience, translated by Auckland, New Zeland.

  • Becker D, Cailleau B, Kaiser D, Dahm T (2014) Macroscopic failure processes at mines revealed by acoustic emission (AE) monitoring. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(4):1785–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG, Niarchos D (2009) Gravel drains for the remediation of liquefiable sites: the seed & booker (1977) approach revisited. International conference on performance-based design. Japan, International society for soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Tokyo, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard JW, Jennings HM, Livingston RA, Nonat A, Scherer GW, Schweitzer JS, Scrivener KL, Thomas JJ (2011) Mechanisms of cement hydration. Cement Concr Res 41(12):1208–1223

  • Carraro JAH, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2009) Shear strength and stiffness of sands containing plastic or nonplastic fines. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(9):1167–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DP (1988) Liquefaction potential of sand deposits under low levels of excitation. California Univ, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (2005). Earthquake dynamics of structures–a primer, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), USA.

  • Chou H, Yang C, Hsieh B, Chang S (2001) A study of liquefaction related damages on shield tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courard L, Michel F, Perkowicz S, Garbacz A (2014) Effects of limestone fillers on surface free energy and electrical conductivity of the interstitial solution of cement mixes. Cement Concr Compos 45:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Fall M (2015) A coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical model for underground cemented paste backfill. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 50:396–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Fall M (2017) Modeling of pressure on retaining structures for fill mass. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 69:94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61(1–2):43–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungca JR, Kuwano J, Takahashi A, Saruwatari T, Izawa J, Suzuki H, Tokimatsu K (2006) Shaking table tests on the lateral response of a pile buried in liquefied sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(2–4):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plewes HD, Chambers RW, Friedel R, Jibiki TK, Sy A (2010) Ground improvement by dynamic compaction at a tailings disposal facility International conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and sopil dynamics 2, Missouri University of Science and Technology

  • Fall M, Benzaazoua M, Ouellet S (2005) Experimental characterization of the influence of tailings fineness and density on the quality of cemented paste backfill. Miner Eng 18(1):41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fall M, Benzaazoua M, Sae E (2008) Mix proportioning of underground cemented paste backfill. J Tunn Undergr Space 23:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fall M, Célestin JC, Pokharel M, Touré M (2010) A contribution to understanding the effects of curing temperature on the mechanical properties of mine cemented tailings backfill. Eng Geol 114(3–4):397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang K, Fall M (2020) Shear behavior of the interface between rock and cemented backfill: effect of curing stress, drainage condition and backfilling rate. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(1):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD (2012) Unsaturated soil mechanics in engineering practice. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirian A, Fall M (2013) Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical–chemical behaviour of cemented paste backfill in column experiments. Part I: physical, hydraulic and thermal processes and characteristics. Eng Geol 164:195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirian A, Fall M (2014) Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical–chemical behaviour of cemented paste backfill in column experiments. Eng Geol 170:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghirian A, Fall M (2016) Long-term coupled behaviour of cemented paste backfill in load cell experiments. Geomech Geoeng 11(4):237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guoxing C, Su C, Xi Z, Xiuli D, Chengzhi QI, Zhihua W (2015) Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 76:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haiqiang J, Fall M, Cui L (2016) Yield stress of cemented paste backfill in sub-zero environments: experimental results. Miner Eng 92:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa HS, Wetmiller RJ, Gendzwill DJ (1989) Induced seismicity in mines in Canada—an overview. Pure Appl Geophys 129(3–4):423–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa A, Nakajima J, Uchida N, Okada T, Zhao D, Matsuzawa T, Umino N (2009) Plate subduction, and generation of earthquakes and magmas in Japan as inferred from seismic observations: an overview. Gondwana Res 16(3–4):370–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helinski M, Fourie A, Fahey M, Ismail M (2007) Assessment of the self-desiccation process in cemented mine backfills. Can Geotech J 44(10):1148–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S (1989) Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1-g gravitational field. Soils Found 29(1):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1996) Soil behavior in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford University Press, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali M (2012) Effect of binder content and load history on the one dimensional compression of Williams Mine cemented paste backfill, Master of applied science Thesis, University of Toronto.

  • James M, Jolette D, Aubertin M and Bussière B (2003) An experimental set-up to investigate tailings liquefaction and control measures, translated by Montréal, QC, Canada.

  • Jefferies M, Been K (2015) Soil liquefaction: a critical state approach, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiaer WU, Kammerer AM, Riemer MF, Seed RB and Pestana JM (2004) Laboratory study of liquefaction triggering criteria, translated by Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  • Kesimal A, Yilmaz E, Ercikdi B, Alp I, Deveci H (2005) Effect of properties of tailings and binder on the short-and long-term strength and stability of cemented paste backfill. Mater Lett 59(28):3703–3709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Aubertin M (2012) A modified solution to assess the required strength of exposed backfill in mine stopes. Can Geotech J 49(8):994–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Fall M (2016) Sulphate effect on the early age strength and self-desiccation of cemented paste backfill. Constr Build Mater 106:296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu G, Fall M (2017) Simulation of blast induced liquefaction susceptibility of subsurface fill mass. Geotech Geol Eng 36(3):1683–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu G, Fall M, Yang Z (2019) An evolutive bounding surface plasticity model for early-age cemented tailings backfill under cyclic loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 117:339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamlouk MS, Zaniewski JP (2011) Materials for civil and construction engineers, 3rd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Meymand PJ (1998) Shaking table scale model Tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay, PhD dissertation. U.C, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed FMO (2014) Bearing capacity and settlement behaviour of footings subjected to static and seismic loading conditions in unsaturated sandy soils, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ottawa.

  • Moncarz PD and Krawinkler H (1981) Theory and application of experimental model analysis in earthquake engineering, Stanford University.

  • Motamed R, Towhata I, Honda T, Tabata K, Abe A (2013) Pile group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: E-defense large shake table test. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 51:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir O, Fall M (2010) Coupling binder hydration, temperature and compressive strength development of underground cemented paste backfill at early ages. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada (2019). Earthquake reports for 2019, [online], available: http://www.seismescanada.rncan.gc.ca/recent/2019/index-en.php 2019].

  • Ngadimon K (2006) Design and simulation of hydraulic shaking table, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Technology.

  • Noumowé A (1995) Effet des hautes températures (20°C–600°C) sur le béton, Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquèes.

  • Nouri H, Fakher A, Jones C (2006) Development of horizontal slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes and walls. Geotext Geomembr 24(3):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri H, Fakher A, Jones CJFP (2008) Evaluating the effects of the magnitude and amplification of pseudo-static acceleration on reinforced soil slopes and walls using the limit equilibrium horizontal slices method. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttli OW (1973) Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations for eastern North America. J Geophys Res 78(5):876–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura M, Soga Y (2006) Effect of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand. Soils Found 46(5):695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Mining Association (2017). Ontario Miniral Production.

  • Özgen S, Malkoç Ö, Doğancik C, Sabah E, Şapçi FO (2011) Optimization of a multi gravity separator to produce clean coal from Turkish lignite fine coal tailings. Fuel 90(4):1549–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pépin N, Aubertin M, James M, Leclerc M (2012b) Seismic simulator testing to investigate the cyclic behavior of tailings in an instrumented rigid box. Geotech Test J 35(3):469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pépin N, Aubertin M and James M (2009) An investigation of the cyclic behaviour of tailings using shaking table tests–effect of a drainage inclusion on porewater development, translated by Halifax, N.S., Canada.

  • Pépin N, Aubertin M, James M (2012a) Seismic table investigation of the effect of inclusions on the cyclic behaviour of tailings. Can Geotech J 49(4):416–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcino D, Marcianò V, Granata R (2015) Cyclic liquefaction behaviour of a moderately cemented grouted sand under repeated loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 79:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos SJ, Robinsky EI, Keller TO (1985) Liquefaction resistance of thickened tailings. J Geotech Eng 111(12):1380–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saebimoghaddam A (2010) Liquefaction of early age cemented paste backfill, Ph.D Thesis, University of Toronto.

  • Salem TM, Ragai SM (2001) Electrical conductivity of granulated slag-cement kiln dust-silica fume pastes at different porosities. Cem Concr Res 31(5):781–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrivener KL, Juilland P, Monteiro PJM (2015) Advances in understanding hydration of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 78:38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Pyke R, Martin GR (1975) Effect of multi-directional shaking on liquefaction of sands. University of California, Earthquake engineering research Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Srilatha N, Madhavi Latha G, Puttappa CG (2013) Effect of frequency on seismic response of reinforced soil slopes in shaking table tests. Geotext Geomembr 36:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriskandakumar S (2004). Cyclic loading response of fraser river sand for validation of numerical models simulating centrifuge tests, Ph.D Thesis, University of British Columbia, Canada.

  • Su C, Baizan T, Zhao K, Xiaojn L, Haiyang Z (2020) Seismic response of irregular underground structures under adverse soil conditions using shaking table tests. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 95:103145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudarshan NM, Chandrashekar Rao T (2017) Vibration impact on fresh concrete of conventional and UHPFRC. Int J Appl Eng Res 12(8):1683–1690

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A, Takemura J, Suzuki A, Kusakabe O (2001) Development and performance of an active type shear box in a centrifuge. Int J Phy Model Geotech 1(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson BD, Grabinsky MW, Bawden WF and Counter DB (2009). In-situ measurements of cemented paste backfill in long-hole stope, translated by Toronto, ON, Canada.

  • Tokimatsu K, Seed HB (1987) Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng 113(8):861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle M, Law KT, Seeber L, Jacob K (1990) Liquefaction and ground failure induced by the 1988 Saguenay, Quebec, earthquake. Can Geotech J 27(5):580–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueng TS, Wang MH, Chen MH, Chen CH, Peng LH (2006) A large biaxial shear box for shaking table test on saturated sand. Geotech Test J 29(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chen G, Chen S (2015) Experimental study on seismic response of geogrid reinforced rigid retaining walls with saturated backfill sand. Geotext Geomembr 43(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Fall M, Wu A (2016) Initial temperature-dependence of strength development and self-desiccation in cemented paste backfill that contains sodium silicate. Cement Concr Compos 67:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Salam S, Xiao M (2019) The effect of shaking history on liquefaction resistance of sand deposit using shake table testing. In Geo-congress 2019: earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, pp. 285–293

  • Wu D, Fall M, Cai S (2014) Numerical modelling of thermally and hydraulically coupled processes in hydrating cemented tailings backfill columns. Int J Min Reclam Environ 28(3):173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Kammerer AM, Riemer MF, Seed RB, Pestana JM (2004). Laboratory study of liquefaction triggering criteria. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, paper No 2580.

  • Yang L, Woods RD (2015) Shear stiffness modeling of cemented clay. Can Geotech J 52(2):156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz E, Belem T, Benzaazoua M (2012) One-dimensional consolidation parameters of cemented paste backfills/parametry jednowymiarowej konsolidacji podsadzki w postaci Cementowej Pasty. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi–mineral Resour Manag 28(4):29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz E, Belem T, Bussière B, Mbonimpa M, Benzaazoua M (2015) Curing time effect on consolidation behaviour of cemented paste backfill containing different cement types and contents. Constr Build Mater 75:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Yue C (2020) Shaking table test study on the functionality of rubber isolation bearing used in underground structure subjected to earthquakes. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 98:103153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Glasser FP (2001) Thermal stability and decomposition mechanisms of ettringite at <120°C. Cem Concr Res 31(9):1333–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu F, Clark JI (1994) The effect of dynamic loading on lateral stress in sand. Can Geotech J 31(2):308–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for financially supporting this project. Moreover, the authors would like to thank Dr. Mohammed Al-Umar, Dr. Gamal Elnabelsya, and Dr. Mohamed Salah for their help with the experimental tests.

Funding

National Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamadou Fall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no known conflicts of interests or competing interests.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alainachi, I., Fall, M. & Majeed, M. Behaviour of Backfill Undergoing Cementation Under Cyclic Loading. Geotech Geol Eng 40, 4735–4759 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02181-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02181-y

Keywords

Navigation