Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional geotechnical modeling of the soils in Riyadh city, KSA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A standard penetration test (SPT) was carried out for 700 samples from 143 boreholes in four districts in Riyadh city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Rock quality designation (RQD) and unconfined compression strength (UCS) tests were also performed for 238 samples from 154 boreholes in 15 districts of the city. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the SPT, RQD, and UCS were produced using the Voxler 3 software package. Further, 333 soil samples collected from 106 boreholes in 11 districts were examined to spatially model the distinctive geotechnical patterns of the alluvial soils in two dimensions. Tests were carried out to determine the soil grain size distribution, natural water content (NWC%), Atterberg’s consistency limits [liquid limit (LL%), plastic limit (PL%), and plasticity index (PI%)], and soil–water chemical components (pH Cl, SO32−, and CO3). Spatial maps of the geotechnical parameters were produced by applying the geostatistical ordinary kriging implemented in ArcGIS. Soil samples were classified according to the unified soil classification system (USCS), and a thickness of the silty clay layer was produced. Plasticity charts indicated that the soils are inorganic cohesive clays with low and moderate plasticity (CL). Soil strength parameters showed wide ranges of UCS (average 220, range 21.3–618 kg/cm2), SPT (average 39, 0–100 N), and RQD (average 44, 11–78%). UCS and SPT 3D models clarified a regional southeastward trend of increase. RQD 3D models showed poor to fair engineering quality of rocks (25–75%). The results presented here can help to establish geohazard zonation maps with construction favorability ratings for safe urban expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Refai T, Al-Ghamdy D (1994) Geological and geotechnical aspects of Saudi Arabia. Geotech Geol Eng 12:253–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Solai SA (1983) Compressibility characteristics of desert soils used for highway embankments. BSc Project, Civil Engineering Department, King Saud University, Riyadh

  • ASTM (2005) Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by gas pycnometer. ASTM standard D5550-06. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 04.08. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, pp 1–4

  • Cameron DA (2006) The role of vegetation in stabilizing highly plastic clay subgrades. In: Ghataora GS, Burrow MPN (eds) Proceedings of Railway Foundations, Rail Found 06, Birmingham, Sept., pp 165–186

  • Casagrande A (1932) Research on the Atterberg limits of soils. Public Roads 13(8):121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrétien M, Fabre R, Denis A, Marache A (2007) Recherche des paramètres d’identification géotechnique optimaux pour une classification des sols sensibles au retrait gonflement. Rev Fr Géotech 120–121:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton CRI, Xu M, Whiter JT, Ham A, Rust M (2010) Stresses in cast-iron pipes due to seasonal shrink-swell of clay soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Manag 163(WM3):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakhil FH, Al Gahtani AS (1982) The deterioration of concrete structures in the environment of Eastern of Saudi Arabia. Arabia J Sci Eng 7(3):191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rienzo F, Oreste P, Pelizza S (2008) Subsurface geological–geotechnical modelling to sustain underground civil planning. Eng Geol 96:187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores. Rock Mech Eng Geol 1:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1989) Rock quality designation (RQD) after twenty years. US Army Corps of Engineers Contract Report GL-89-1. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 67

  • Dhowian AW, Touma FT (1991) Water sensitive soils in Saudi Arabia. In: Proceedings of the third Saudi Engineering conference, vol 1, King Saud University, Riyadh, pp 110–115

  • Dhowian A, Ruwiah I, Erol A (1985) The distribution and evaluation of expansive soils in Saudi Arabia. In: Proceedings of the Second Saudi Engineering Conference, vol 4. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 1969–1990

  • Dhowian A, Erol Orhan, Abdulfattah Y (1988) Evaluation of expansive soils and foundation methodology in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. King Abdula-ziz City for Science and Technology, Riyad

    Google Scholar 

  • Donghee K, Kyu-Sun K, Seongkwon K, Youngmin C, Woojin L (2012) Assessment of geotechnical variability of Songdo silty clay. Eng Geol 133–134:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsheshtawy Y (2008) The evolving Arab City: tradition, modernity and urban development. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-12821-1

  • Hack R, Orlic B, Ozmutlu S, Zhu S, Rengers N (2006) Three and more dimensional modelling in geoengineering. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman D, Hyndman D (2009) Natural hazards and disasters. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolat Ç, Ulusay R, Lütfi Süzen M (2012) Development of geotechnical microzonation model for Yenisehir (Bursa, Turkey) located at a seismically active region. Eng Geol 127:36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons RL, Frost JD (2002) Evaluating site investigation quality using GIS and geostatistics. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 128(6):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phien-wej N, Giao PH, Nutalaya P (2006) Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand. Eng Geol 82:187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim KSA (1981) Strength and formation characteristics of sedimentary rocks. In: Proceedings of the symposium on geotechnical problems in Saudi Arabia, vol II, King Saud University, Riyadh, pp 169–200

  • Royse KR, Rutter H, Entwisle D (2009) Property attribution of 3D geological models in the Thames Gateway, London: new ways of visualising geoscientific information. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavridakis EI (2006) Assessment of anisotropic behaviour of swelling soils on ground and construction work. In:Al-Rawas AA, Goosen MFA (eds) Expansive soils:recent advances in characterization and treatment. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 371–384

  • Thierry P, Prunier-Leparmentier A, Lembezat C, Vanoudheusden E, Vernous J (2009) 3D geological modeling at urban scale and mapping of ground movement susceptibility from gypsum dissolution: the Paris example (France). Eng Geol 105:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleii AHE (1984) Linear shrinkage characteristics of aeolian desert deposits. Project Report for BSc in Civil Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are greatly indebted to Prof Dr Martin G. Culshaw, Editor-in-Chief, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, and the two anonymous reviewers for the given time and expertise to comment on the paper and for their constructive comments, which contributed to the improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alaa A. Masoud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masoud, A.A., Aal, A.K.A. Three-dimensional geotechnical modeling of the soils in Riyadh city, KSA. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1011-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1011-x

Keywords

Navigation