Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Bearing Capacity and Failure Pattern in Shell Foundations by FELA Method

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development in analysis and design of shell foundation types have led to understand that there are more advantages of shell foundations compared to their conventional plane counterparts. The bearing capacity of foundations depends on the shape of the failure surface and it can be influenced by various parameters, including the footing dimensions, the soil properties and the foundation roughness. In this research, several triangular strip shell foundations were analysed by FELA method and the soil failure surface dimensions under foundations were compared and it was observed that the failure pattern under shell foundations is not dependent on dimensions and the fundamental parameters in determining the failure surface are the friction between foundation and soil, as well as the depth of the foundation, such that by increasing depth of footing, the ratio of bearing capacity of the shell foundations to their plane counterpart will be decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B :

The width of foundation

D :

The depth of foundation

E :

The elastic modulus of the soil

c :

The cohesion of soil

q :

The ultimate bearing capacity of foundation

B 1 :

The width of failure wedge

D 1 :

The depth of failure wedge

γ :

The unit weight of soil

ν :

The poison ratio

φ :

The internal friction angle of soil

δ :

The friction angle between foundation and soil

α :

The peak angle of shell foundation

κ :

The bearing capacity ratio

References

  • Ebrahimi K, Khazaei J (2015) Comparison of bearing capacity of conical and circular foundations on reinforcement soil with geogrid. In: Second Iranian conference on soil mechanic and foundation engineering, Qom, Iran (in Persian)

  • Ebrahimi K, Hamidi A, Homami P (2013a) Influence of using of ring beam on shells foundations bearing capacity. In: The first Iranian conference on geotechnical engineering, Ardabil, Iran (in Persian)

  • Ebrahimi K, Hamidi A, Homami P (2013b) Determination of the optimal form of shell foundations. In: The first Iranian conference on geotechnical engineering, Ardabil, Iran (in Persian)

  • Griffths DV (1982) Computation of bearing capacity factors using finite elements. Geotechnique 3:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna AM, Abdel-Rahman MM (1998) Experimental investigation of shell foundation on dry sand. Can Geotech J 35:847–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keawsawasvong S, Ukritchon B (2017) Undrained limiting pressure behind soil gaps in contiguous pile walls. Comput Geotech 83:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder FE (1905) Building, construction and superintendence. Hard Press Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krabbenhoft K, Lyamin A, Krabbenhoft J (2015) Optum computational engineering (OptumG2). www.optumce.com. Accessed 26 Feb 2018

  • Kurian NP, Devaki VM (2005) Analytical studies on the geotechnical performance of shell foundations. Can Geotech J 42:562–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyamin AV, Salgado R, Sloan SW, Prezzi M (2007) Two- and three-dimensional bearing capacity of footings in sand. Geotechnique 57(8):647–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makrodimopoulos A, Martin CM (2006) Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive frictional materials using second-order cone programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66:604–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makrodimopoulos A, Martin CM (2007) Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31:835–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CM (2005a) Exact bearing capacity calculations using the method of characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on IACMAG, Turin, pp 441–450

  • Martin CM (2005b) ABC: analysis of bearing capacity software. http://www.eng.ox.ac.uk/civil/people/cmm/software. Accessed 12 April 2018

  • Meyerhof GG (1951) The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations. Geotechnique 2(4):301–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh M, Joy BM (2015) Experimental study on conical shell footing. Int J Eng Res Technol. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV4IS060097

    Google Scholar 

  • Shareena S, Rajesh AK (2017) Seismic performance of hyperbolic paraboloid and inverted spherical shell foundation. Int Res J Adv Eng Sci 2(2):148–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan SW (1989) Upper bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 13:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto K, Lyamin AV, Abbo AJ, Sloan SW, Hira M (2009) Bearing capacity and failure mechanism of different types of foundations on sand. Soils Found 49(2):305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jahangir Khazaei.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, K., Khazaei, J. Investigation of Bearing Capacity and Failure Pattern in Shell Foundations by FELA Method. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 3523–3534 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-00831-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-00831-2

Keywords

Navigation