Skip to main content
Log in

Geotechnical Behavior of Conical and Skirted Foundations Through Experimental and Numerical Assessment

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The present research has focused on the load–displacement relationship (P-δ) of flat and different types of shell foundations and the effects of various parameters including soil properties and foundation geometry have been considered.

Methods

The geotechnical behavior and influential factors (D/B, B, Dr, ϕ) of conical and skirted shell foundations have been studied via physical models and finite element method (FEM). The final outcomes have been verified through comparisons of loading behavior with other researches.

Results

Increasing embedment depth ratio results in a growth in foundation capacity on different sand states specifically in weak sand layers with low relative density and angle of internal friction. The results of bearing load in loose sand demonstrated that conical shells with different D/B ratios have a higher bearing capacity than the skirted ones which is more highlighted in D/B ≤ 0.5. Nevertheless, by increasing sand density and enhancing soil shear strength, skirted foundation becomes more efficient compared to the conical, particularly for D/B ≥ 0.5. However, in both types of shells on dense sand, the general shear mode governs the foundation failure.

Conclusion

In this paper, the load bearing behavior and failure mechanism of shell foundations ((D/B = 0, 25, 0.5, 0.75) on loose and dense sand state (Dr = 29 and 73%) have been examined and compared to their flat counterparts. Enhancement in ultimate load by utilizing shell foundations and increasing the foundation embedment depth varies in a range of 34–100% depending upon foundation type, D/B, Dr, and angle of internal friction (φ).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The required data is provided in the article.

References

  • Abd El-Rahman, M. M.: Ultimate bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings on sand. Master Thesis, Concordia University, Canada (1987)

  • Agarwal, K.B., Gupta, R.N.: Soil structure interaction in shell foundations. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Soil Structure Interaction, vol. 1, pp. 110–112 University of Roorkee, India (1983)

  • Arabpanahan, M., Mirghaderi, S.R., Hosseini, A., Sharif, A.P., Ghalandarzadeh, A.: Experimental–numerical investigation of embedment effect on foundation behavior under vertical loading. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 17, 1951–1969 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringkgreve, R.B, Vermeer, P.A.: Plaxis finite element code for soil and rock analysis. The Netherlands (1998)

  • El-Saied, A.E., Saleh, N.M., El-Mashad, M.E.: Behavior of circular footing resting on laterally confined granular reinforced soil. Housing and Building Nat Res Center J 11(2), 240–245 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Sawwaf, M.E.I., Nazer, A.: Behavior of circular footings on confined granular soil. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. - ASCE 131(3), 359–366 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, A., Moshfeghi, S., MolaAbasi, H., Eslami, M.: Piezocone and cone penetration tests (CPTu and CPT) applications in foundation engineering, 1st edn, p 390. Elsevier Science (2019)

  • Gholipour, S., Makarchian, M.: Study of the behaviour of skirted shallow foundations resting on sand. Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech. 18(3), 117–130 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, A.M., El-Rahman, M.M.: Ultimate bearing capacity of triangular shell strip footings on sand. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 116(12), 1851–1863 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huat, B.B.K., Mohammed, T.A., Abang Ali, A.A.A., and Abdullah. A.A.: Numerical and field study on triangular shell footing for low rise building. Int. J. Eng. Technol, 4(2), 194–204 (2007)

  • Iyer, T.S., and Rao, N.R.: Model studies on funicular shells as rafts on sands. In: Proceedings, Symposium on Shallow Foundations, vol. 1, pp. 149–156 Bombay, India (1970)

  • Kurian, P.N.: Shell foundations: geometry, analysis, design and construction, p 379. Alpha Science International Ltd. (2006)

  • Rezazadeh, S., Eslami, E.: Skirted semi-deep foundations behaviour on deposits with variable undrained shear strength. Sh. Offshore Struct. 15(5), 492–502 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, R.: Inverted shell foundations in stochastic soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada (2012)

  • Rinaldi, R., Abdel-Rahman, M., and, Hanna, A.: Experimental investigation on shell footing models employing high-performance concrete”, In: Rodrigues, H., Elnashai, A., Calvi, G. (eds) Facing the challenges in structural engineering, GeoMEast 2017, pp. 373–390 Sustainable Civil Infrastructures (2018)

  • Vermeer, P.: Plaxis user’s manual. Balkema, Rotterdam, Ne, 577 (1998)

  • Vesic, A.B.: Bearing capacity of deep foundations in sand. Highway Res. Rec. 39, 112–153 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesic, A.S.: Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE 99(1), 45–73 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Arash Tadayon: experimental tests and numerical simulation, conceptualization, visualization, interpretation, and writing.

Abolfazl Eslami: structuring, methodology, interpretation, validation, and editing.

Kazem Fakharian: methodology, interpretation, supervision, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Eslami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

According to the type of article, this item is not required for this article.

Consent for Publication

All of the authors of the article agree to publish.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tadayon, A., Eslami, A. & Fakharian, K. Geotechnical Behavior of Conical and Skirted Foundations Through Experimental and Numerical Assessment. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00380-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-024-00380-z

Keywords

Navigation