Skip to main content
Log in

Applying Rock Engineering Systems to Evaluate Shaft Resistance of a Pile Embedded in Rock

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shaft resistance of a pile (τfm) embedded in rock is one of the important parameters utilized in civil engineering. Although in–situ techniques are the best methods to determine τfm, they are expensive and time–consuming. Furthermore, accurate estimation of the τfm is not an easy task and relatively little research has been done in this area. To overcome these problems, in this paper, based on the basic concepts of a rock engineering systems (RES) approach, a new model for the estimation of the τfm and the risk associated is presented. The newly suggested model involves 7 effective parameters on τfm (rock type, uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock, rock mass quality, thickness and density of the presence of soils above the rock, thickness and density of the rock), while retaining simplicity as well. To establish the model, a database from the literature was used. A comparison was also carried out between the performance of the RES-based predictive model and multiple regression models. The RES-based model demonstrated a better performance considering its greater determination coefficient (R2) and smaller mean square error compared to the other models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Reproduced with permission from Serrano and Olalla 2006)

Fig. 2

(modified after Hudson 1992)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahri Najafi A, Saeedi GR, Ebrahimi Farsangi MA (2014) Risk analysis and prediction of out-of-seam dilution in longwall mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benardos A, Kaliampakos D (2004) A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling—illustrated by the Athens Metro, Greece. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:987–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Geotechnical Society (1985) Canadian foundation engineering manual, 2nd edn. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancelli A, Crosta G (1993) Hazard and risk assessment in rockfall prone areas risk and reliability in ground engineering. Thomas Telford, London, pp 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi F, Farsangi ME, Mansouri H (2013a) An RES-based model for risk assessment and prediction of backbreak in bench blasting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi F, Mansouri H, Ebrahimi Farsangi M (2013b) A rock engineering systems based model to predict rock fragmentation by blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi F, Mansouri H, Farsangi MAE (2014) Development of rock engineering systems-based models for flyrock risk analysis and prediction of flyrock distance in surface blasting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1291–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi H (2017) Risk assessment and prediction of safety factor for circular failure slope using rock engineering systems. Environ Earth Sci 76:224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi H (2018) An estimation of required rotational torque to operate horizontal directional drilling using rock engineering systems. J Pet Sci Technol 8:82–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi H, Moradi A (2017) Risk assessment and estimation of TBM penetration rate using RES-based model. Geotech Geol Eng 35:365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi H, Moradi A (2018) A new approach for estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus: a rock engineering systems-based model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frough O, Torabi SR (2013) An application of rock engineering systems for estimating TBM downtimes. Eng Geol 157:112–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1988) The Hoek–Brown failure criterion-a 1988 update. In: Proceedings of the 15th Canadian rock mech. symposium. Toronto, Dept. Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, pp 31–38

  • Hooley P, Lefroy Brooks S (1993) The ultimate shaft frictional resistance mobilised by bored piles in over-consolidated clays and socketed into weak and weathered rock. Eng Geol Spec Publ pp 447–447

  • Horvath RG (1982) Drilled piers socketed into weak shale: methods of improving performance. University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath R, Kenney T, Kozicki P (1983) Methods of improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock. Can Geotech J 20:758–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Huang J, Ju N, Li Y (2013) Automated tunnel rock classification using rock engineering systems. Eng Geol 156:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA (1992) Rock engineering systems: theory and practice. Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammalamadaka SR (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis. The American Statistician

  • Kim M-K, Yoo Y-I, Song J-J (2008) Methodology to quantify rock behavior around shallow tunnels by rock engineering systems. Geosyst Eng 11:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Salgado R (1999) Determination of pile base resistance in sands. J Geotech Geoenviron 125:673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu P, Latham J (1994) A continuous quantitative coding approach to the interaction matrix in rock engineering systems based on grey systems approaches. In: Proceedings of 7th international congress of the IAEG, Lisbon, Portugal. pp 4761–4770

  • Mazzoccola D, Hudson J (1996) A comprehensive method of rock mass characterization for indicating natural slope instability. Q J Eng Geol 29:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghadehi MZ, Jimenez R, KhaloKakaie R, Jalali S-ME (2013) A new open-pit mine slope instability index defined using the improved rock engineering systems approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping L, Hudson J (1993) A fuzzy evaluation approach to the stability of underground excavations. In: ISRM international symposium-EUROCK 93. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  • Rosenberg P, Journeaux NL (1976) Friction and end bearing tests on bedrock for high capacity socket design. Can Geotech J 13:324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe R, Armitage H (1987) A design method for drilled piers in soft rock. Can Geotech J 24:126–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffari A, Ataei M, Ghanbari K (2013) Applying rock engineering systems (RES) approach to evaluate and classify the coal spontaneous combustion potential in Eastern Alborz coal mines. Int J Min Geo Eng 47:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano A, Olalla C (2004) Shaft resistance of a pile embedded in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano A, Olalla C (2006) Shaft resistance of piles in rock: comparison between in situ test data and theory using the Hoek and Brown failure criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:826–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin H-S, Kwon Y-C, Jung Y-S, Bae G-J, Kim Y-G (2009) Methodology for quantitative hazard assessment for tunnel collapses based on case histories in Korea. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1072–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne C (1977) The allowable loadings of foundations on shale and sandstone in the Sydney region, part 3: field test results. Sydney Group of Australian Geomechanics Society

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Fattahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fattahi, H. Applying Rock Engineering Systems to Evaluate Shaft Resistance of a Pile Embedded in Rock. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 3269–3279 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0536-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0536-5

Keywords

Navigation