Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new approach for estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus: a rock engineering systems-based model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The deformation modulus of a rock mass is one of the crucial parameters used in the design of surface and underground rock engineering structures. Due to the problems in determining the deformability of jointed rock masses at the laboratory scale, various in-situ test methods have been developed. Although these methods are currently the best techniques, they are expensive and time-consuming, and present operational problems. To overcome this difficulty, in this paper, based on the basic concepts of a rock engineering systems (RES) approach, a new model for the prediction of the deformation modulus of a rock mass is presented. The newly proposed approach involves seven effective parameters (depth, rock quality designation, uniaxial compressive strength, the discontinuity density, the condition of discontinuities, the groundwater condition, and an adjustment for the orientation of discontinuities) pertinent to the deformation modulus of a rock mass, yet keeping simplicity as well. The performance of the RES model is compared with multiple regression models. The estimation abilities offered using RES and multiple regression models were presented by using field data obtained from road and railway construction sites in Korea. The results achieved indicate that the RES-based model predictor with the least mean square error and a higher coefficient of determination (R 2) performs better than the multiple regression models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

)modified after Hudson 1992)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agüero A, Pinedo P, Simón I, Cancio D, Moraleda M, Trueba C, Pérez-Sánchez D (2008) Application of the Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment to a generic high-level waste disposal site. Sci Total Environ 403:34–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avila R, Moberg L (1999) A systematic approach to the migration of 137Cs in forest ecosystems using interaction matrices. J Environ Radioactiv 45:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahri Najafi A, Saeedi GR, Ebrahimi Farsangi MA (2014) Risk analysis and prediction of out-of-seam dilution in longwall mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benardos A, Kaliampakos D (2004) A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling—illustrated by the Athens Metro, Greece. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:987–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski Z (1973) Engineering classification of rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civ Eng 15:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienniawski Z (1989) Engineering rock mass classification. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancelli A, Crosta G (1993) Hazard and risk assessment in rockfall prone areas Risk and reliability in ground engineering. Thomas Telford, London, pp 177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun B-S, Ryu WR, Sagong M, Do J-N (2009) Indirect estimation of the rock deformation modulus based on polynomial and multiple regression analyses of the RMR system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condor J, Asghari K (2009) An alternative theoretical methodology for monitoring the risks of CO2 leakage from wellbores. Energy Proc 1:2599–2605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi F, Farsangi ME, Mansouri H (2013a) An RES-based model for risk assessment and prediction of backbreak in bench blasting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi F, Mansouri H, Ebrahimi Farsangi M (2013b) A rock engineering systems based model to predict rock fragmentation by blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:82–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi F, Mansouri H, Farsangi MAE (2014) Development of rock engineering systems-based models for flyrock risk analysis and prediction of flyrock distance in surface blasting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1291–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi H (2016) Application of improved support vector regression model for prediction of deformation modulus of a rock mass. Eng Comput 32:567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholamnejad J, Bahaaddini H, Rastegar M (2013) Prediction of the deformation modulus of rock masses using artificial neural networks and regression methods. J Min Environ 4:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2003) Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Yesilnacar E, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2004) A neuro-fuzzy model for modulus of deformation of jointed rock masses. Comput Geotech 31:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown E (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Diederichs M (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA (1992) Rock engineering systems: theory and practice. Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammalamadaka SR (2003) Introduction to linear regression analysis. Am Stat 57:67–87. doi:10.1198/tas.2003.s211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabasi A, Gokceoglu C, Ercanoglu M (2003) Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagina Serafim J, Pereira J (1983) Considerations on the geomechanical classification of Beniawski. In: International symposium on engineering geology and underground construction, pp II, 33-II, 42

  • Lu P, Latham J (1994a) A continuous quantitative coding approach to the interaction matrix in rock engineering systems based on grey systems approaches. In: Proceedings of 7th international congress of the IAEG, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 4761–4770

  • Lu P, Latham JP (1994b) A continuous quantitative coding approach to the interaction matrix in rock engineering systems based on grey systems approaches. In: Proceedinsg of the 7th international congress of IAEG. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 4761–4770

  • Majdi A, Beiki M (2010) Evolving neural network using a genetic algorithm for predicting the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews M, Lloyd B (1998) The river test catchment surveillance project South Water Utilities Final Research Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Surrey, UK

  • Mavroulidou M, Hughes SJ, Hellawell EE (2004) A qualitative tool combining an interaction matrix and a GIS to map vulnerability to traffic induced air pollution. J Environ Manag 70:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoccola D, Hudson J (1996) A comprehensive method of rock mass characterization for indicating natural slope instability. Q J Eng Geol 29:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitri H, Edrissi R, Henning J (1995) Finite-element modeling of cable-bolted stopes in hard-rock underground mines. Trans-Soc Min Metall Explor Inc 298:1897–1902

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi MR, Farsangi MAE (2014) Application of the risk matrix method for geotechnical risk analysis and prediction of the advance rate in rock TBM tunneling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1951–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson G, Bieniawski Z (1990) A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. Int J Min Geol Eng 8:181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmström A, Singh R (2001) The deformation modulus of rock masses—comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 16:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping L, Hudson J (1993) A fuzzy evaluation approach to the stability of underground excavations. In: ISRM international symposium-EUROCK 93. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  • Saffari A, Ataei M, Ghanbari K (2013) Applying rock engineering systems (RES) approach to evaluate and classify the coal spontaneous combustion potential in Eastern Alborz coal mines. Int J Min Geo Eng 47:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Considerations of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski. In: International symposium on engineering geology and underground construction, pp 1133–1144

  • Shin H-S, Kwon Y-C, Jung Y-S, Bae G-J, Kim Y-G (2009) Methodology for quantitative hazard assessment for tunnel collapses based on case histories in Korea. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1072–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagius K, Wiborgh M, Ström A, Morén L (1997) Performance assessment of the geosphere barrier of a deep geological repository for spent fuel: the use of interaction matrices for identification, structuring and ranking of features, events and processes. Nucl Eng Des 176:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C (2004) Indirect determination of the modulus of deformation of rock masses based on the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu H, Kayabasi A (2006) Estimation of rock modulus: for intact rocks with an artificial neural network and for rock masses with a new empirical equation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dorp F, Egan M, Kessler JH, Nilsson S, Pinedo P, Smith G, Torres C (1998) Biosphere modelling for the assessment of radioactive waste repositories; the development of a common basis by the BIOMOVS II reference biospheres working group. J Environ Radioactiv 42:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco H, Ayub J, Belli M, Sansone U (2006) Interaction matrices as a first step toward a general model of radionuclide cycling: application to the 137 Cs behavior in a grassland ecosystem. J Radioanal Nucl Ch 268:503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein H (2004) Using RQD to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Arak University of Technology, Arak, Iran

    Hadi Fattahi & Ali Moradi

Authors
  1. Hadi Fattahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi Fattahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fattahi, H., Moradi, A. A new approach for estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus: a rock engineering systems-based model. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 363–374 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-1000-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-1000-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation