Abstract
The shear strength reduction technique is becoming more and more popular to determine the factor-of-safety for geotechnical constructions, especially for slopes. At present, two in principal different procedures are used to apply the numerical shear strength reduction technique for materials characterised by non-linear failure envelopes, like the Hoek–Brown criterion. One procedure is based on the determination on local stress and strength values, whereas the other is based on a global linearization of the non-linear failure envelope. This article shortly describes and discusses these two different procedures and compares results for a broad spectrum of parameter constellations based on slope stability calculations. The local approach is physically more correct. The global approach can be considered as a first approximation. A comparison of both methods reveal that the global approach in comparison to the local approach, can leads to a deviation of up to 15 % in both directions. If one considers the local approach as the ‘correct’ one, depending on the parameters the results of the global approach can lie on the safe or unsafe site. The practical conclusion is that evaluation of slope stability using the global approach can result in uneconomic slope design or overestimation of safety margin. The use of the local approach instead of the global should be preferred. In case of small safety margins (e.g. 20 % or less) the use of the local approach is strictly recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benz T, Schwab R, Kauther RA, Vermeera PA (2008) Hoek–Brown criterion with intrinsic material strength factorization. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(2):210–222
Dawson EM, You KH, Park YJ (2000) Strength-reduction stability analysis of rock slopes using the Hoek–Brown failure Criterion. In: Labuz JF, Glaser SD, Dawson EM (eds) Trends in rock mechanics. ASCE special publication no. 102, pp 65–77
Detournay C, Varona P, Hart RD (2011) In: 2nd International FLAC/DEM symposium, Melbourne, Australia, February 2011
Duncan JM (1996) State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes. J Geotech Eng 122(7):577–596
Fu W, Liao Y (2010) Non-linear shear strength reduction technique in slope stability calculation. Comput Geotech 37:288–298
Hammah RE, Yacoub TE, Corkum BC, Curran JH (2005) The shear strength reduction method for the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion. ARMA/USRMS, 05-810
Hoek E, Brown ET (1988) The Hoek–Brown failure criterion—a 1988 update. In: Curran JH (ed) Proceedings of the 15th Canadian rock mechanics symposium. Civil Engineering Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, pp 31–38
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion. In: Proceedings of the North American rock mechanics symposium, 2002 edn, vol 1, pp 267–273, Toronto
ITASCA (2009) FLAC. ITASCA Consulting Group Inc., MN
Li AJ, Merifield RS, Lyamin AV (2008) Stability charts for rock slopes based on the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:689–700
MathWorks (2010) MATLAB. The MathWorks Corporation, MA
Rockscience (2011) ROCKLAB. Rockscience, ON
Shukha R, Baker R (2003) Mesh geometry effects on slope stability calculation by FLAC strength reduction method—linear and non-linear failure criteria. In: 3rd international conference on FLAC and numerical modelling in geomechanics, pp 109–116. Sudbury, ON, Canada
Walter K, Konietzky H (2008) Room pillar dimensioning for gypsum and anhydrite mines in Germany. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in mining and tunnelling, pp 349–362, Hanoi, Vietnam
Acknowledgments
This work was performed during a 6-month post-doc stay of the first author at the Geotechnical Institute of the TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany. The financial support by the J. N. Tata Endowment, Jamshedji Tata Trust and Sir Dorabji Tata Trust is highly appraciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborti, S., Konietzky, H. & Walter, K. A Comparative Study of Different Approaches for Factor of Safety Calculations by Shear Strength Reduction Technique for Non-linear Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion. Geotech Geol Eng 30, 925–934 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9517-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9517-2