Skip to main content
Log in

Maize-bean intercrop response to nutrient application relative to maize sole crop response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maize-bean intercropping is important in sub-Saharan Africa. Maize sole crop (MSC) nutrient response has been much studied but data is scarce for determination of intercrop functions. A procedure for adapting MSC functions for the maize-bean intercrop was developed. Maize sole crop and intercrop responses were near parallel with notable exceptions for P in high potential areas for maize and for K. Mean intercrop bean yield with no nutrient application was about 0.4 Mg ha−1 and increased on average by 24, 11 and −3% with N, P and K application, respectively. Response function coefficients for MSC adjusted with the ratio of bean to maize grain value as the dependent variable accounted for nearly all variation in intercrop response coefficients providing the basis for determining intercrop response functions from MSC functions. Maize grain yield equivalent was less with MSC compared with intercrop; exceptions were for response to N in high potential areas and for bean to maize value ratios of two or less. The economically optimal rate of N and P were on average about 15% more but less for K with intercrop compared with MSC but with inconsistency. The economically optimal rate ranged widely with variation in the cost of nutrient use relative to grain value but generally without great effect on yield; an exception was a great effect on MSC yield response to N for high potential areas. Intercrop nutrient response functions can be reliably determined once maize sole crop functions are determined for a recommendation domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CP:

The cost of using a fertilizer nutrient relative to the on-farm value of the maize grain on a ($ kg−1) ($ kg−1)−1 basis

EOR:

The nutrient rate giving maximum net return per ha due to nutrient application, that is the economically optimal rate

FURP:

Fertilizer Use Recommendation Project conducted in Kenya in the 1980s–90s

HP and LP:

High and low potential areas for maize production

MSC:

Maize sole crop

NwP, PwN and KwNP:

Responses to N, P and K with uniform base applications of some level of P, N and N plus P respectively

OFRA:

Optimization of Fertilizer Recommendations in Africa project

References

  • Alemu T, Taylor MS, Tekletsadik T (1987) Intercropping of maize with forages. Ethiop J Agric Sci 9:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Belay D, Schulthess F, Omwega C (2009) The profitability of maize-haricot bean intercropping techniques to control stem borers under low pest incidence in Ethiopia. Phytoparasitica 37:43–50. doi:10.1007/s12600-008-0002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun HMH (1982) Agro-climatic zones map of Kenya, scale 1:1 000 000. Rep. E1, Kenya Soil Survey, Nairobi

  • Chalk PM (1996) Nitrogen transfer from legumes to cereals in intercropping. In. Proc. of the Int. Workshop: Dynamics of roots and nitrogen in cropping systems of the Semi-Arid Tropics. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, pp 351–374

  • CIMMYT (1998) From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual. CIMMYT, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark EA, Francis CA (1985) Bean maize intercrops: a comparison of bush and climbing bean growth habits. Field Crops Res 10:151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JHC, Garcia S (1983) Competitive ability and growth habit of indeterminate beans and maize for intercropping. Field Crops Res 6:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobermann A, Wortmann CS, Ferguson RB, Hergert CW, Shapiro CA, Tarkalson DD, Walters D (2011) Nitrogen response and economics for irrigated corn in Nebraska. Agron J 103:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTM (2014) Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa Project (DTM) Bulletin Vol.3(3)

  • Ebwongu M, Adipala E, Ssekabembe CK, Kyamanywa S, Bhagsari AS (2001) Effect of intercropping maize and solanum potato on yield of the component crops in central Uganda. Afr Crop Sci J 9:83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennin SA, Clegg MD, Francis CA (2002) Resource utilization in soybean/maize intercrops. Afr Crop Sci J 10:251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Foundufe YE, Agboola AA, Yamamoo S, Hoona T (2001) An assessment of some fertilizer recommendations under different cropping systems in a humid tropical environment. Tropicultura 19:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • FURP (1994) Fertilizer use recommendation project. Fertilizer recommendations reports. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Nairobi, Vols 1–22

  • Getachew A, Amare G and Sinebo W (2007) Cereal-faba bean mixed cropping: Yield advantage and land use effi ciency. Res. Rep. 70. Ethiopian Inst. Agric. Res., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Jaetzold RH, Schmidt H, Hornetz B, and Shisanya C (2006) Farm Management Handbook of Kenya, Nairobi

  • Jansen JA, Wortmann CS, Stockton MA, Kaizzi KC (2013) Maximizing net returns to financially constrained fertilizer use. Agron J 105:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeranyama P, Hesterman OB, Waddington SR, Harwood RR (2007) Relay-intercropping of sunnhemp and cowpea into a smallholder maize system in Zimbabwe. Agron J 92:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaizzi KC, Byalebeka J, Semalulu O, Alou I, Zimwanguyizza W, Nansamba A, Musinguzi P, Ebanyat P, Hyuha T, Wortmann CS (2012a) Maize response to fertilizer and nitrogen use efficiency in Uganda. Agron J 104:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaizzi KC, Byalebeka J, Semalulu O, Alou I, Zimwanguyizza W, Nansamba A, Musinguzi P, Ebanyat P, Hyuha T, Wortmann CS (2012b) Sorghum response to fertilizer and nitrogen use efficiency in Uganda. Agron J 104:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaizzi KC, Wortmann C, Byalebeka J, Semalulu O, Alou I, Zimwanguyizza W, Nansamba A, Musinguzi P, Ebanyat P, Hyuha T (2012c) Optimizing smallholder returns to fertilizer use: bean, soybean and groundnut. Field Crops Res. 127:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaizzi, KC, Mohammed MB, Nouri M (2017) Fertilizer use optimization: principles and approach. In: Wortmann CS and Sones K (eds) Fertilizer Use Optimization in sub-Saharan Africa. 17 chapters. Published by CABI

  • Kibunja CN, Ndungu-Magiroi KW, Wamae DK, Mwangi TJ, Nafuma L (deceased), Koech MN, Ademba J and Kitonyo EM (2017) Optimizing Fertilizer Use within the Context of Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Kenya. In: Wortmann CS and Sones K (eds) Fertilizer Use Optimization in sub-Saharan Africa. 17 chapters. Published by CABI. pp 82–99

  • Mesfin T, Mohammed J, Taklete A, Merga F, Wortmann C (2014) Skip-row planting of maize and sorghum production in semi-arid Ethiopia. Afr J Plant Sci 8:140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musambasi D, Chivinge OA, Mariga IK (2002) Intercropping maize with grain legumes for striga control in Zimbabwe. Afr Crop Sci J 10:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nampala P, Ogenga-Latigo MW, Kyamanywa S, Adipala E, Oyobo N, Jackai LEN (2002) Potential impact of intercropping on major cowpea field pests in Uganda. Afr Crop Sci J 10:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo GD and Ariga ES (2001) Effect of intercropping maize and beans on striga incidence and grain yield. In Fresian D (ed.) Proc. 7th E. S. Afr. Reg. Maize Conf., 11–15 Feb 2001. Digital Process Works Ltd., Nairobia, p. 183–186

  • Onyango RMA, Mwangi TK, Kiiya WW, Kamidi MK, Wanyonyi MW (2002) Evaluation of organic and inorganic fertilizer for small holder maize production in North Rift Kenya. In: Mureithi JG, Gachene CKK, Muyekho FN, Onyango M, Magenya O (eds) Proc 2nd Sci Conf Soil Manage Legume Res Network Projects. KARI, Legume Research Network Project, Nairobi, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Senkoro CJ, Ley GJ, Marandu AE, Wortmann C, Mzimbiri M, Msaky J, Umbwe R and Lyimo SD (2017) Optimizing fertilizer use within the context of integrated soil fertility management in Tanzania. In: Wortmann CS and Sones K (eds) Fertilizer Use Optimization in sub-Saharan Africa. 17 chapters. Published by CABI. pp 176–192

  • Siame J, Willey RW, Morse S (1998) The response of maize/Phaseolus intercropping to applied nitrogen on Oxisols in northern Zambia. Field Crops Res 55:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp SS, Silim SN (2002) Farmer preferences and legume intensification for low nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245:181–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stern WR (1993) Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercrop systems. Field Crops Res 34:335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsubo M, Ogindo HO, Walker S (2004) Yield evaluation of maize-bean intercropping in a semi-arid region of South Africa. Afr Crop Sci J 12:351–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington SR, Mekuria M, Siziba S, Karigindi J (2007) Long-term yield sustainability and financial returns from grain legume-maize intercrops on a sandy soil in sub humid north central Zimbabwe. Exp Agric 43:489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahua TAT (1983) Nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and cowpeas and a concept of nutrient supplementation index (NSI). Exp Agric 19:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workayehu T, Wortmann CS (2011) Maize-bean intercrop suppression of weeds and profitability in southern Ethiopia. Agron J 104:1058–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann CS, Schnier HF, Muriuki AW (1996) Estimation of the fertilizer response of maize and bean intercropping using sole crop response equations. Afr Crop Sci J 4:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortmann CS, Kirkby RA, Eledu CA and Allen DJ (1998) An Atlas of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Africa. Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/africa/pdf/atlas_bean_africa/contents.pdf

  • Wortmann CS, Milner MA, Kaizzi KC, Maman N, Cyamweshi RA, Dicko MK, Kibunja C, Macharia M, Maria R, Nalivata P, Negash D, Nkonde D, Ouattara K, Senkoro CJ, Tarfa BD, Tetteh FM (2017) Maize-nutrient response information applied across Sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 107:175–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

OFRA is a partnership of 13 African countries, funded by the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), managed by CAB International, and implemented with technical and scientific advisory support from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln to enable great farmer profitability from fertilizer use. We acknowledge the contributions of researchers, support technicians and the farmers who cooperated in conducting FURP and OFRA field trials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles S. Wortmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndungu-Magiroi, K.W., Wortmann, C.S., Kibunja, C. et al. Maize-bean intercrop response to nutrient application relative to maize sole crop response. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 109, 17–27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9862-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9862-x

Keywords

Navigation