Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and stoichiometry in the response of maize to various N rates under different rotation systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Better understanding of plant nutrition and nutrient interactions is of critical importance for developing best management practices in crop production. A three-year study was conducted to examine N and P nutrition and their association in maize as affected by rotation system, N application rate and hybrid maize. Rotation by N treatments were composed of maize–alfalfa (MA), maize–soybean (MS) and continuous maize (MM), fertilized in maize year at 0, 50, 100 and 150 kg N ha−1, respectively. The two maize varieties were glyphosate-resistant (RR) non-Bt (non-Bt) and stacked RR + Bt near-isoline (Bt) hybrids. Our data showed that grain yield, stover, and total aboveground (or shoot) dry matter, N and P uptake (except for stover P) in amounts followed the order MA > MS > MM and were well responsive to N rates. Grain and shoot N and P contents of Bt maize was greater (P < 0.05) than those of non-Bt hybrid in MM. The N:P ratio was positively correlated with N application rates, and was greater in rotational maize than in MM. Both hybrids attained their maximum yields at approximately 201 kg ha−1 of grain N and 255 kg ha−1 of shoot N, corresponding to 36 and 43 kg P ha−1 in grain and shoot. Nitrogen harvest index, P harvest index and nutrient internal efficiency were responsive to N rates but were not different between the hybrids. This study revealed that the critical grain and shoot N content achieving maximum yield appeared to concomitantly result in high P contents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belanger G, Claessens A, Ziadi N (2011) Relationship between P and N concentration in maize and wheat leaves. Field Crops Res 123:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger G, Claessens A, Ziadi N (2012) Grain N and P relationships in maize. Field Crops Res 126:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns HA, Abel CA (2003) Nitrogen fertility effects on Bt σ-endotoxin and nitrogen concentrations of maize during early growth. Agron J 95:207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caviglia OP, Melchiori RJM, Sadras VO (2014) Nitrogen utilization efficiency in maize as affected by hybrid and N rate in late-sown crops. Field Crops Res 168:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan YK, McCormick WA, Ma BL (2013) Fertilizer effects on soil archaeal abundance at two Ontario experimental farms during three consecutive cropping seasons. Appl Soil Ecol 68:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampitti IA, Vyn TJ (2012) Physiological perspective of change over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiency: a review. Field Crops Res 133:8–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampitti IA, Vyn TJ (2013) Maize nutrient accumulation and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen rate: II. Calcium, magnesium and micronutrients. Agron J 105:1645–1657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampitti IA, Murrell ST, Camberato JJ, Vyn TJ (2013) Maize nutrient accumulation and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen rate: I. Macronutrients. Agron J 105:783–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillehay BL, Roth GW, Calvin DD, Kratochvil RJ, Kuldau GA, Hyde JA (2004) Performance of Bt corn hybrids, their near isolines, and leading corn hybrids in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Agron J 96:818–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding W, Hume DJ, Vyn TJ, Beauchamp EG (1998) N credit for soybean to a following maize crop in central Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 78:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke SO, Lydon J, Koskinen WC, Moorman TB, Chaney RL, Hammerschmidt R (2012) Glyphosate effects on plant mineral nutrition, crop rhizosphere microbiota, and plant disease in glyphosate-resistant crops. J Agric Food Chem 60:10375–10397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fageria VD (2001) Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J Plant Nutr 24:1269–1290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang M, Motavalli PP, Kremer RJ, Nelson KA (2007) Assessing changes in soil microbial communities and carbon mineralization in Bt and non-Bt corn residue amended soils. Appl Soil Ecol 37:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber JV, Nafziger ED, Mies DW (1999) Evaluation of transgenic Bt-containing corn hybrids. J Prod Agric 12:659–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung HG, Sheaffer CC (2004) Influence of Bt transgenes on cell wall lignification and digestibility of maize stover for silage. Crop Sci 44:1781–1789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Biswas DK (2015) Precision nitrogen management for sustainable corn production. In: Lichtfouse E, Goyal A (eds) Sustainable agriculture reviews volume 16—cereals, chapter 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Dwyer LM (1998) Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. Plant Soil 199:283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Subedi KD (2005) Yield, grain moisture, and nitrogen use of Bt corn hybrids and their conventional near-isolines. Field Crop Res 93:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Dwyer LM, Gregorich EG (1999) Soil N amendment, effects on seasonal N mineralization and N cycling in maize production. Agron J 91:1003–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Ying J, Dwyer LM, Gregorich EG, Morrison MJ (2003) Crop rotation and soil N amendment effects on maize production in eastern Canada. Can J Soil Sci 83:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BL, Liang BC, Biswas DK, Morrison MJ, McLaughlin NB (2012) The carbon footprint of maize production as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and maize-legume rotations. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 94:15–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney TS, Silveira KG, Oplinger ES (1999) Rotational versus nitrogen-fixing influence of soybean on corn grain and silage yield and nitrogen use. J Prod Agric 12:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungai NW, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Kremer RJ (2005) Differences in yields, residue composition and N mineralization dynamics of Bt and non-Bt maize. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 73:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimbault BA, Vyn TJ (1991) Crop rotation and tillage effects on maize growth and soil structural stability. Agron J 83:979–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedell WE, Pikul JL, Jaradat AA, Schumacher TE (2009) Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on soil fertility, maize mineral nutrition, yield, and seed composition. Agron J 101:870–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochester IJ (2006) Effects of genotype, edaphic, environmental conditions, and agronomic practices on CRY1Ac protein expression in transgenic cotton. J Cotton Sci 10:252–262

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VQ (2006) The N: P stoichiometry of cereal, grain legume and oilseed crops. Field Crops Res 95:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar B, Para AK, Purakayastha TJ (2008) Transgenic Bt-cotton affects enzyme activity and nutrient availability in a sub-tropic inceptisol. J Agron Crop Sci 194:289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setiyono TD, Walters DT, Cassman KG, Witt C, Dobermann A (2010) Estimating maize nutrient uptake requirements. Field Crops Res 118:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Vadez V (2002) Physical traits for crop yield improvement in low N and P environment. Plant Soil 245:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subedi KD, Ma BL (2005) Effects of N-deficiency and timing of N supply on the recovery and distribution of labeled 15 N in contrasting maize hybrids. Plant Soil 273:189–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subedi KD, Ma BL (2007) Dry matter and nutrient partitioning patterns in Bt and non-Bt near-isoline maize hybrids. Crop Sci 47:1186–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson SR, Grunes DL, Sumner ME (1999) Nutrient interactions in soil and plant nutrition. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 89–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Ma BL, Liang BC (2008) Quantification of seasonal soil nitrogen mineralization for corn production in eastern Canada. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T, Kremer RJ, Castro PBC, Wood BW (2009) Glyphosate interactions with physical, nutrition, and diseases of plants: threat to agricultural sustainability. Eur J Agron 31:111–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziadi N, Belanger G, Cambourus AN, Tremblay N, Nolin MC, Claessens A (2007) Relationship between P and N concentrations in corn. Agron J 99:833–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zobiole LH, Oliveira RS Jr, Huber DM, Constantin J, Castro C, Oliveira FA, Oliveira A Jr (2010) Glyphosate reduces shoot concentrations of mineral nutrients in glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Plant Soil 328:57–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported, in part, by the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Growing Forward II target funding project J-000106. We wish to thank Lynne Evenson, Ulrica McKim and Scott Peterson of AAFC for their excellent technical assistance in the experiment. Ulrica McKim also carefully read the latest version of the manuscript. AAFC-ECORC Contribution No. 16-003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. L. Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, B.L., Zheng, Z.M., Morrison, M.J. et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and stoichiometry in the response of maize to various N rates under different rotation systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104, 93–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9761-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9761-6

Keywords

Navigation