Abstract
Better understanding of plant nutrition and nutrient interactions is of critical importance for developing best management practices in crop production. A three-year study was conducted to examine N and P nutrition and their association in maize as affected by rotation system, N application rate and hybrid maize. Rotation by N treatments were composed of maize–alfalfa (MA), maize–soybean (MS) and continuous maize (MM), fertilized in maize year at 0, 50, 100 and 150 kg N ha−1, respectively. The two maize varieties were glyphosate-resistant (RR) non-Bt (non-Bt) and stacked RR + Bt near-isoline (Bt) hybrids. Our data showed that grain yield, stover, and total aboveground (or shoot) dry matter, N and P uptake (except for stover P) in amounts followed the order MA > MS > MM and were well responsive to N rates. Grain and shoot N and P contents of Bt maize was greater (P < 0.05) than those of non-Bt hybrid in MM. The N:P ratio was positively correlated with N application rates, and was greater in rotational maize than in MM. Both hybrids attained their maximum yields at approximately 201 kg ha−1 of grain N and 255 kg ha−1 of shoot N, corresponding to 36 and 43 kg P ha−1 in grain and shoot. Nitrogen harvest index, P harvest index and nutrient internal efficiency were responsive to N rates but were not different between the hybrids. This study revealed that the critical grain and shoot N content achieving maximum yield appeared to concomitantly result in high P contents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belanger G, Claessens A, Ziadi N (2011) Relationship between P and N concentration in maize and wheat leaves. Field Crops Res 123:28–37
Belanger G, Claessens A, Ziadi N (2012) Grain N and P relationships in maize. Field Crops Res 126:28–37
Bruns HA, Abel CA (2003) Nitrogen fertility effects on Bt σ-endotoxin and nitrogen concentrations of maize during early growth. Agron J 95:207–211
Caviglia OP, Melchiori RJM, Sadras VO (2014) Nitrogen utilization efficiency in maize as affected by hybrid and N rate in late-sown crops. Field Crops Res 168:27–37
Chan YK, McCormick WA, Ma BL (2013) Fertilizer effects on soil archaeal abundance at two Ontario experimental farms during three consecutive cropping seasons. Appl Soil Ecol 68:26–35
Ciampitti IA, Vyn TJ (2012) Physiological perspective of change over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiency: a review. Field Crops Res 133:8–67
Ciampitti IA, Vyn TJ (2013) Maize nutrient accumulation and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen rate: II. Calcium, magnesium and micronutrients. Agron J 105:1645–1657
Ciampitti IA, Murrell ST, Camberato JJ, Vyn TJ (2013) Maize nutrient accumulation and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen rate: I. Macronutrients. Agron J 105:783–795
Dillehay BL, Roth GW, Calvin DD, Kratochvil RJ, Kuldau GA, Hyde JA (2004) Performance of Bt corn hybrids, their near isolines, and leading corn hybrids in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Agron J 96:818–824
Ding W, Hume DJ, Vyn TJ, Beauchamp EG (1998) N credit for soybean to a following maize crop in central Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 78:29–33
Duke SO, Lydon J, Koskinen WC, Moorman TB, Chaney RL, Hammerschmidt R (2012) Glyphosate effects on plant mineral nutrition, crop rhizosphere microbiota, and plant disease in glyphosate-resistant crops. J Agric Food Chem 60:10375–10397
Fageria VD (2001) Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J Plant Nutr 24:1269–1290
Fang M, Motavalli PP, Kremer RJ, Nelson KA (2007) Assessing changes in soil microbial communities and carbon mineralization in Bt and non-Bt corn residue amended soils. Appl Soil Ecol 37:150–160
Graeber JV, Nafziger ED, Mies DW (1999) Evaluation of transgenic Bt-containing corn hybrids. J Prod Agric 12:659–663
Jung HG, Sheaffer CC (2004) Influence of Bt transgenes on cell wall lignification and digestibility of maize stover for silage. Crop Sci 44:1781–1789
Ma BL, Biswas DK (2015) Precision nitrogen management for sustainable corn production. In: Lichtfouse E, Goyal A (eds) Sustainable agriculture reviews volume 16—cereals, chapter 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–62
Ma BL, Dwyer LM (1998) Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. Plant Soil 199:283–291
Ma BL, Subedi KD (2005) Yield, grain moisture, and nitrogen use of Bt corn hybrids and their conventional near-isolines. Field Crop Res 93:199–211
Ma BL, Dwyer LM, Gregorich EG (1999) Soil N amendment, effects on seasonal N mineralization and N cycling in maize production. Agron J 91:1003–1009
Ma BL, Ying J, Dwyer LM, Gregorich EG, Morrison MJ (2003) Crop rotation and soil N amendment effects on maize production in eastern Canada. Can J Soil Sci 83:483–495
Ma BL, Liang BC, Biswas DK, Morrison MJ, McLaughlin NB (2012) The carbon footprint of maize production as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and maize-legume rotations. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 94:15–31
Maloney TS, Silveira KG, Oplinger ES (1999) Rotational versus nitrogen-fixing influence of soybean on corn grain and silage yield and nitrogen use. J Prod Agric 12:175–187
Mungai NW, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Kremer RJ (2005) Differences in yields, residue composition and N mineralization dynamics of Bt and non-Bt maize. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 73:101–109
Raimbault BA, Vyn TJ (1991) Crop rotation and tillage effects on maize growth and soil structural stability. Agron J 83:979–985
Riedell WE, Pikul JL, Jaradat AA, Schumacher TE (2009) Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on soil fertility, maize mineral nutrition, yield, and seed composition. Agron J 101:870–879
Rochester IJ (2006) Effects of genotype, edaphic, environmental conditions, and agronomic practices on CRY1Ac protein expression in transgenic cotton. J Cotton Sci 10:252–262
Sadras VQ (2006) The N: P stoichiometry of cereal, grain legume and oilseed crops. Field Crops Res 95:13–29
Sarkar B, Para AK, Purakayastha TJ (2008) Transgenic Bt-cotton affects enzyme activity and nutrient availability in a sub-tropic inceptisol. J Agron Crop Sci 194:289–296
Setiyono TD, Walters DT, Cassman KG, Witt C, Dobermann A (2010) Estimating maize nutrient uptake requirements. Field Crops Res 118:158–168
Sinclair TR, Vadez V (2002) Physical traits for crop yield improvement in low N and P environment. Plant Soil 245:1–15
Subedi KD, Ma BL (2005) Effects of N-deficiency and timing of N supply on the recovery and distribution of labeled 15 N in contrasting maize hybrids. Plant Soil 273:189–202
Subedi KD, Ma BL (2007) Dry matter and nutrient partitioning patterns in Bt and non-Bt near-isoline maize hybrids. Crop Sci 47:1186–1192
Wilkinson SR, Grunes DL, Sumner ME (1999) Nutrient interactions in soil and plant nutrition. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 89–112
Wu T, Ma BL, Liang BC (2008) Quantification of seasonal soil nitrogen mineralization for corn production in eastern Canada. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:279–290
Yamada T, Kremer RJ, Castro PBC, Wood BW (2009) Glyphosate interactions with physical, nutrition, and diseases of plants: threat to agricultural sustainability. Eur J Agron 31:111–113
Ziadi N, Belanger G, Cambourus AN, Tremblay N, Nolin MC, Claessens A (2007) Relationship between P and N concentrations in corn. Agron J 99:833–841
Zobiole LH, Oliveira RS Jr, Huber DM, Constantin J, Castro C, Oliveira FA, Oliveira A Jr (2010) Glyphosate reduces shoot concentrations of mineral nutrients in glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Plant Soil 328:57–69
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported, in part, by the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Growing Forward II target funding project J-000106. We wish to thank Lynne Evenson, Ulrica McKim and Scott Peterson of AAFC for their excellent technical assistance in the experiment. Ulrica McKim also carefully read the latest version of the manuscript. AAFC-ECORC Contribution No. 16-003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, B.L., Zheng, Z.M., Morrison, M.J. et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and stoichiometry in the response of maize to various N rates under different rotation systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104, 93–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9761-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9761-6