Skip to main content
Log in

Cohesive crack, size effect, crack band and work-of-fracture models compared to comprehensive concrete fracture tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The simplest form of a sufficiently realistic description of the fracture of concrete as well as some other quasibrittle materials is a bilinear softening stress-separation law (or an analogous bilinear law for a crack band). This law is characterized by four independent material parameters: the tensile strength, \(f'_t\), the stress \(\sigma _k\) at the change of slope, and two independent fracture energies—the initial one, \(G_f\) and the total one, \(G_F\). Recently it was shown that all of these four parameters can be unambiguously identified neither from the standard size effects tests, nor from the tests of complete load-deflection curve of specimens of one size. A combination of both types of test is required, and is here shown to be sufficient to identify all the four parameters. This is made possible by the recent data from a comprehensive test program including tests of both types made with one and the same concrete. These data include Types 1 and 2 size effects of a rather broad size range (1:12.5), with notch depths varying from 0 to 30 % of cross section depth. Thanks to using identically cured specimens cast from one batch of one concrete, these tests have minimum scatter. While the size effect and notch length effect were examined in a separate study, this paper deals with inverse finite element analysis of these comprehensive test data. Using the crack band approach, it is demonstrated: (1) that the bilinear cohesive crack model can provide an excellent fit of these comprehensive data through their entire range, (2) that the \(G_f\) value obtained agrees with that obtained by fitting the size effect law to the data for any relative notch depth deeper than 15 % of the cross section (as required by RILEM 1990 Recommendation), (3) that the \(G_F\) value agrees with that obtained by the work-of-fracture method (based on RILEM 1985 Recommendation), and (4) that the data through their entire range cannot be fitted with linear or exponential softening laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bažant ZP (1982) Crack band model for fracture of geomaterials. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on numerical methods in geomechanics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, (ed). by Eisenstein Z, held at University of Alberta, Edmonton, vol 3, pp 1137–1152

  • Bažant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. ASCE J Eng Mech 110(4):518–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP (1996) Size effect aspects of measurement of fracture characteristics of quasibrittle material. Ad Cem Based Mater 4(3/4):128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP (2005) Scaling of structural strength. Elsevier, MA, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Becq-Giraudon E (2002) Statistical prediction of fracture parameters of concrete and implications for choice of testing standard. Cem Concr Res 32(4):529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Kazemi MT (1991) Size dependence of concrete fracture energy determined by Rilem work-of-fracture method. Int J Frac 51:121–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Li Z (1996) Zero-brittleness size-effect method for one-size fracture test of concrete. J Eng Mech 122(5):458–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Novák D (2000) Energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle failure at crack initiation. ACI Mater J 97(3):381–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct 16:155–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Pfeiffer PA (1987) Determination of fracture energy from size effect and brittleness number. ACI Mater J 84:463–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Planas J (1998) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP and Yu Q (2004) Size effect in concrete specimens and structures: New problems and progress In Fracture mechanics of concrete structures. In: Proceedings of fraMCoS-5, 5th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures, Vail, Colo., vol 1, Li VC, Leung KY, Willam KJ, and Billington SL, (eds)., Swets and Zeitlinger, Balkema, Lisee, The Netherlands, 153–162

  • Bažant ZP, Yu Q (2009) Universal size effect law and effect of crack depth on quasi-brittle structure strength. J Eng Mech 135(2):78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bažant ZP, Yu Q (2011) Size-effect testing of cohesive fracture parameters and nonuniqueness of work-of-fracture method. J Eng Mech 137(8):580–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman TF, Li Y (1994) On the convergence of reflective newton methods for large-scale nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. Math Prog 67(2):189–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman TF, Li Y (1996) An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J Optim 6:418–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusatis G, Schauffert EA (2009) Cohesive crack analysis of size effect. Eng Frac Mech 76:2163–2173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpinteri A, Chiaia B, Ferro G (1995) Multifractal scaling law: An extensive application to nominal strength size effect of concrete structures, No. 50. Atti del Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale, Politecnico de Torino, Italy

  • Hillerborg A (1985) The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energy \(g_f\) of concrete. Mater Struct 18:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2013) Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: Size effects of types 1 and 2, crack length effect and postpeak. Eng Frac Mech 110:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2014) Comparison of Hu-Duan boundary effect model to size-shape effect law for quasibrittle fracture based on new comprehensive fracture tests. J Eng Mech. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000632

  • Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2014) Universal size-shape effect law based on comprehensive concrete fracture tests. J Eng Mech. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000627

  • Hoover CG, Bažant ZP, Vorel J, Wendner R, Hubler MH (2013) Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: description and results. Eng Frac Mech 114:92–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin GR (1958) Fracture. In: Flgge S (ed) Handbuch der physik. Springer, Berlin, pp 551–590

  • Karihaloo BL, Abdalla HM, Xiao QZ (2003) Size effect in concrete beams. Eng Frac Mech 70:979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazars J (1984) Application de la mécanique de l’endommagement au comportement nonlinéaire et à la rupture du béton de structure Thèse de doctorat d’etat, univ. vi, france, EPFL, Lausanne

  • Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1989) Continuum damage theory-application to concrete. J Eng Mech 115(2):345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malvar JL, Warren GE (1988) Fracture energy for three-point-bend tests on single-edge-notched beams. Exp Mech 28(3):266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama J (1965) Direct measurement of fracture energies of brittle heterogeneous material. J Am Ceram Soc 48(11):583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nallathambi P (1986) Fracture behaviour of plain concretes. PhD thesis, Doctoral dissertation, University of New Castle, Australia

  • Patzák B, Bittnar Z (2001) Design of Object Oriented Finite Element Code. Ad Eng Softw 32(10–11):759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson PE (1981) Crack growth and development of fracture zone in plain concrete and similar materials. Report no. tvbm-1006, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden

  • RILEM Recommendation TC 50-FMC (1985) Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams Mat. and Str., 18:285–290

  • Rocco CG (1995) Size dependence and fracture mechanisms in the diagonal compression splitting test. Phd thesis, Department of Ciencia de Materiales, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

  • Sabnis GM, Mirza SM (1979) Size effect in model concretes. J Struct Div ASCE 105:1007–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang T, Bažant ZP, Yang S, Zollinger D (1996) Variable-notch one-size test method for fracture energy and process zone length. Eng Frac Mech 53(3):383–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall HG, Tappin G (1966) The work of fracture and its measurement in metals, ceramics and other materials. J Mater Sci 1(3):296–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull W (1939) The phenomenon of rupture in solids. In: Proceedings of Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research, 153:1–55, Ingenioersvetenskaps Akad, Handl., Stockholm

  • Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Q, Le JL, Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2010) Problems with hu-duan boundary effect model and its comparison to size-shape effect law for quasibrittle fracture. J Eng Mech 136(1):40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the U.S. Department of Transportation, provided through Grant 20778 from the Infrastructure Technology Institute of Northwestern University, is gratefully appreciated. Further support for theoretical study was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI-1129449 to Northwestern University. The first author also wishes to thank for first year partial support under W.P. Murphy Fellowship of Northwestern University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zdeněk P. Bažant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoover, C.G., Bažant, Z.P. Cohesive crack, size effect, crack band and work-of-fracture models compared to comprehensive concrete fracture tests. Int J Fract 187, 133–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9926-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-013-9926-0

Keywords

Navigation