Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple UAVs path planning algorithms: a comparative study

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are used in team for detecting targets and keeping them in its sensor range. There are various algorithms available for searching and monitoring targets. The complexity of the search algorithm increases if the number of nodes is increased. This paper focuses on multi UAVs path planning and Path Finding algorithms. Number of Path Finding and Search algorithms was applied to various environments, and their performance compared. The number of searches and also the computation time increases as the number of nodes increases. The various algorithms studied are Dijkstra’s algorithm, Bellman Ford’s algorithm, Floyd-Warshall’s algorithm and the AStar algorithm. These search algorithms were compared. The results show that the AStar algorithm performed better than the other search algorithms. These path finding algorithms were compared so that a path for communication can be established and monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cavendish, D., & Gerla, M. (1998). Internet QoS routing using the Bellman-Ford algorithm. In International Conference on High Performance Networking (HPN’98).

  • Chabini, I., & Ganupati, S. (2001). Design and implementation of parallel dynamic shortest path algorithms for intelligent transportation systems applications, Transportation Research Record No. 1771. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Cherkassky B.V., Goldberg A.V., Radzik T. (1996) Shortest paths algorithms: Theory and experimental evaluation. Mathematical Programming 73(2): 129–174

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cvetanovic Z., Nofsinger C. (1990) Parallel Astar search on message-passing architectures. IEEE Computer Society 1: 82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, A., Kabacinski, K., & Drake, S. P. (2007). Design challenges for an autonomous cooperative of UAV’s. Defence Science & Technology Organisation, Department of Defence, Australia, IDC 2007.

  • Fu, L. (1996). Real-time vehicle routing and scheduling in dynamic and stochastic traffic networks. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

  • Gallo G., Pallottino S. (1984). Shortest path methods. In: Florian M. (eds). Transportation planning models. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 227–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayraud, T., & Authie, G. (1992). A parallel algorithm for the all pairs shortest path problem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Computing.

  • Hart E.P., Nilsson N.J., Raphael B. (1968) A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transaction, System Science and Cybernetics, SSC- 4(2): 100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung S.M., Divoky J.J. (1988) A computational study of efficient shortest path algorithms. Computers and Operations Research 15(6): 567–576

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob R., Marathe M., Nagel K. (1999) A computational study of routing algorithms for realistic transportation networks. Journal of Experimental Algorithmics 4: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W.-W. (2005) New trends in route guidance algorithm research of intelligent transportation system. Journal of Zhejiang University 39: 819–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray J.J., Cox C.J., Lendaris G.G., Saeks R. (2002) Adaptive dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 32: 140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J.N. (1971) Problem-solving methods in artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1984). Heuristics: Intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

  • Royer, E. M., & Toh, C.-K. (1999). A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, April 1999, 46–55.

  • Sathyaraj, B., Chellappa Doss, R. (2005). Route maintenance using mobility prediction for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE international conference: Mobile adhoc and sensor systems conference, MASS 2005.

  • Tan G.-Z., He H., Sloman A. (2006) Global optimal path planning for mobile robot based on improved Dijkstra algorithm and ant system algorithm. Journal of Central South University of Technology 13: 80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuren V.T., Jansen G.R.M. (1988) Recent developments in path finding algorithms: A review. Transportation Planning and Technology 12: 57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan F.B., Noon C.E. (1998) Shortest path algorithms: An evaluation using real road networks. Transportation Science, 32(1): 65–73

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. C. Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sathyaraj, B.M., Jain, L.C., Finn, A. et al. Multiple UAVs path planning algorithms: a comparative study. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 7, 257–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-008-9035-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-008-9035-0

Keywords

Navigation