Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Fire Water Monitor Jet Reaction Forces and Their Influences on the Roll Stabilities of Urban Firefighting Vehicle

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban main fire fighting vehicle is the most important item of firefighting equipment. The stability and safety of these vehicles need to be assured to avoid fire extinguishing accidents due to vehicle stability or safety problems, especially when firefighting under complex working conditions. Jet reaction force is produced by the stationary nozzle, and its direction is opposite of the jet direction. Consequently, the jet reaction force has a negative effect on the stability of the fire fighting vehicle during the firefighting process. Thus, this paper explores the relationship of jet reaction forces from a fire water monitor under different flow rate operating conditions by using finite element simulations (Fluent and Fluid-Structure Interaction simulations) and experimental research. The FSI method is proposed as a new simulation approach in this study to analyze the fire water monitor jet reaction force under different working conditions. Furthermore, the jet reaction forces are used to analyze the roll stability of urban firefighting vehicle by combining virtual prototype technology, which has not been studied in past publications. The firefighting vehicle rollover angle is 33.8\(^\circ\) when the fire water monitor is not in operation, and the angles decrease from 8.5% to 39.2% when the flow rate increases from 30 L/s to 120 L/s, respectively, compared with a flow rate equal to 0 L/s. Thus, these findings facilitate analyze of jet reaction forces under different flow rates to improve the safety performance of fire fighting vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo Tie-Nan, Zhi-Min Fu (2007) The fire situation and progress in fire safety science and technology in China. Fire Saf J 42(3):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang Lizhong and Zhou Xiaodong and Deng Zhihua and Fan Weicheng and Wang Qing’an, Fire situation and fire characteristic analysis based on fire statistics of China, Fire Saf J, 37(8), 785–802 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhong Maohua, Fan Weicheng, Liu TM, Zhang PH, Wei X, Liao GX (2004) China: some key technologies and the future developments of fire safety science. Safety Science 42(7):627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guha Anirban, Barron Ronald M, Balachandar Ram (2010) Numerical simulation of high-speed turbulent water jets in air. J Hydraul Res 48(1):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Angelino Matteo, Boghi Andrea, Gori Fabio (2016) Numerical solution of three-dimensional rectangular submerged jets with the evidence of the undisturbed region of flow. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 70(8):815–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Shuce, Tao Xueheng, Lu Jinshi, Wang Xuejun, Zeng Zhenhua (2015) Design, optimization and CFD simulation of a nozzle for industrial cleaning processes based on high-pressure water jets, FDMP, Fluid Dyn Mater Process 11(2):143–155

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu Y and Shademan M and Barron RM and Balachandar R, CFD study of effects of geometry variations on flow in a nozzle, Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech, 6(3), 412–425 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu X, Wang J, Li B, Li W (2018) Experimental study on jet flow characteristics of fire water monitor. J Eng

  9. Hu Guo Liang, Chen Wei Gang, Gao Zhi Gang (2010) Flow analysis of spray jet and direct jet nozzle for fire water monitor. Adv Mater Res 139:913–916

    Google Scholar 

  10. HU Guo-liang, LIANG Ju-xing (2010) Numerical simulation and experimental analysis of a collapsed portable type fire water monitor. Chin Hydraul Pneum 65(4):260–76

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guoliang, Hu, Ming, Long, Juxing, Liang, Weihua, Li (2012) Analysis of jet characteristics and structural optimization of a liquamatic fire water monitor with self-swinging mechanism. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(5–8), 805–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rusly E, Aye Lu, Charters WWS, Ooi A (2005) CFD analysis of ejector in a combined ejector cooling system, Int J Refrig, 28(7), 1092–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thanarath Sriveerakul, Satha Aphornratana, Kanjanapon Chunnanond (2007) Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: part 1. Validation of the CFD results. Int J Therm Sci 46(8):812–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sriveerakul T, Aphomatana S, Chunnanond K (2007) Performance prediction of steam ejector using computational fluid dynamics: part 2. Flow structure of a steam ejector influenced by operating pressures and geometries. Int J Therm Sci, 46(8), 823–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y Bartosiewicz and Z Aidoun and Y Mercadier, Numerical assessment of ejector operation for refrigeration applications based on CFD, Appl Therm Eng, 26(5), 604–612 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chin Selena K, Jomaas Grunde, Sunderland Peter B (2017) Firefighter nozzle reaction. Fire Technol 53(5):1907–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huai-bin Wang and Hao Xie, Research on application of heavy compressed air foam truck applied in high-rise building fires, Procedia Eng, 71, 276–285 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W (2007) An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Pearson Education

  19. Fang ZL, Kang Yong, Wang XC, Li D, Hu Y, Huang M, Wang XY (2014) Numerical and experimental investigation on flow field characteristics of organ pipe nozzle, IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 22(5), 052020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu Xiaolong, Wang Deming, Chaohang Xu, Zhu Yunfei, Zhou Wendong, He Fei (2018) Structure influence on jet pump operating limits. Chem Eng Sci 192:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hemidi, Amel, Henry, François, Leclaire, Sébastien, Seynhaeve, Jean-Marie, Bartosiewicz, Yann (2009) CFD analysis of a supersonic air ejector. Appl Therm Eng 29(8–9):1523–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan J and Eves J and Thompsony HM and Toropov VV and Kapur N and Copley D and Mincher A, Computational fluid dynamic analysis and design optimization of jet pumps, Comput Fluids, 46(1), 212–217 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0802900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, J., Li, W. & He, M. Analysis of Fire Water Monitor Jet Reaction Forces and Their Influences on the Roll Stabilities of Urban Firefighting Vehicle. Fire Technol 55, 2547–2566 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00879-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00879-9

Keywords

Navigation