Abstract
Nozzle reaction and hose tension are analyzed using conservation of fluid momentum and assuming steady, inviscid flow and a flexible hose in frictionless contact with the ground. An expression that is independent of the bend angle is derived for the hose tension. If this tension is exceeded owing to anchor forces, the hose becomes straight. The nozzle reaction is found to equal the jet momentum flow rate, and it does not change when an elbow connects the hose to the nozzle. A forward force must be exerted by a firefighter or another anchor that matches the forward force that the jet would exert on a perpendicular wall. Three reaction expressions are derived, allowing it to be determined in terms of hose diameter, jet diameter, flow rate, and static pressure upstream of the nozzle. The nozzle reaction predictions used by the fire service are 56% to 90% of those obtained here for typical firefighting hand lines. Sharing these findings with the fire protection community can improve the safety of firefighters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[1] Purington RG (1974) Fire fighting hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 368
[2] Fornell DP (1991) Fire stream management handbook. PenWell, Saddle Brook, p 223
[3] Wieder MA (2005) Fire service hydraulics and water supply. Fire Protection Publications, Stillwater, p 248
Wieder MA (2008) Fire streams. In: Cote AE, Fire protection handbook. NFPA, Quincy, pp 13–23
[5] Karter MJ (2013) Patterns of firefighter fireground injuries. NFPA, Quincy
Rulseh TJ (2011) A fatality involving a waterjet nozzle provides a lesson in safety diligence when cleaning sewers. Cleaner Magazine, Nov, p 22
[7] Mach E (1919) The science of mechanics: a critical and historical account of its development. Open Court, Chicago, p 299
[8] Oertel H (2010) Prandtl—essentials of fluid mechanics. Springer, New York, p 93
Feynman RP (1985) Surely you’re joking. Norton, New York, pp 63–65
[10] Fay JM (1994) Introduction to fluid mechanics. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 194
[11] Lautrup B (2011) Physics of continuous matter. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 357–358
[12] Theobald JJ (1946) Hydraulics for firemen, with problems and solutions. Barnes, New York, p 31
[13] Crapo WF (2017) Fire protection hydraulics and water supply. Jones and Bartlett, Burlington, p 151
[14] Nazarenko S (2015) Fluid dynamics via examples and solutions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 20–35
[15] Vera F, Rivera R, Núñez C (2015) Letter to editor: backward reaction force on a fire hose, myth or reality? Fire Technol 51:1023–1027
Krishnakumar CK, Atallah S, Borows KA (1991) Development of a flow modifier for reducing the reaction force of firefighting nozzles. US Air Force Report ESL-TR-91-301
Alexandrou AN (2001) Principles of fluid mechanics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 126
[18] Shames IH (2003) Mechanics of fluids. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 195
[19] Crowe CT, Elger DF, Roberson JA (2005) Engineering Fluid Mechanics. Wiley, Hoboken, p 194
[20] Graebel WP (2001) Engineering fluid mechanics. Taylor and Francis, New York, p 155
[21] White FM (2016) Fluid mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 171
[22] Warren JW (1975) Forces on a hose. Phys Educ 10:327–328
[23] Albertson ML, Barton JR, Simons DB (1960) Fluid mechanics for engineers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 114
AWG Fittings GmbH (2016) Fire and rescue catalog. http://www.awg-fittings.com/fileadmin/catalogue/AWG/#12. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
POK (2016) Firefighting equipment catalog. http://www.pok.fr/en/catalogues. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
Fang J (2011) Effect of nozzle design on reaction thrust and spray dynamics. M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis
[27] NFPA 1410 (2015) Standard on training for initial emergency scene operations. NFPA, Quincy
Sicking L (2002) How to calculate nozzle reaction. United States Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/html/02511318/02511318.htm. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
Nelson ME (2003) Vindicator nozzle and hose evaluation report. Montgomery County Maryland Fire and Rescue Service. http://www.1ststriketech.com/Testimonies/MontgomeryCountyReport.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2017
[30] Vestal JN, Bridge EA (2010) A quantitative approach to selecting nozzle flow rate and stream, part 1. Fire Eng 163:10
Acknowledgements
Helpful discussions with W. Fletcher, H. Fowler, K. Isman, and E. Sluder, of UMD, are appreciated. S.K. Chin acknowledges support from the UMD RISE program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chin, S.K., Jomaas, G. & Sunderland, P.B. Firefighter Nozzle Reaction. Fire Technol 53, 1907–1917 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-017-0661-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-017-0661-3