Abstract
This paper argues, first, that the legal construction of transsexualism is a matter of interest, not only to members of the trans community, but to all students of gender, including feminists. The paper then proceeds to explain and analyse, using feminist perspectives, key aspects of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 in the light of the recent caselaw concerning the rights of trans persons. The 2004 Act, it is argued, is a conservative move, which attempts to deny the threat transsexualism poses to the binary system of gender, by instigating a system to formally ‘recognise’ only men and or women. However, the way in which the Act constructs the public/private divide and the mind/body relation carries potential for legal recognition of subject positions which may in a variety of ways be ‘beyond’ the binary system that is currently orthodox. The paper can as such be read as a case study in the legal (re)construction of gender, the gender/sex relation, and the widespread tendency to construct gender conservatively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Bell (2004) ArticleTitle‘‘A Hazy Concept of Equality, Case C-117/01 KB v NHS Pensions Agency and Secretary of State for Health, European Court of Justice, 7 January 2004’‘ Feminist Legal Studies 12/2 223–231 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:FEST.0000043339.80855.77
J. Butler (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” Routledge London
P. Califia (1997) Sex Changes: The Politics of Transgenderism Cleis Press San Francisco
R. Collier (2000) “Straight Families, Queer Lives? Heterosexual(izing) Family Law” C. Stychin D. Herman (Eds) Sexuality in the Legal Arena The Athlone Press London
S. Cowan (2004) ArticleTitle“‘That Woman is a Woman!’ The Case of Bellinger v. Bellinger and the Mysterious (Dis)appearance of Sex” Feminist Legal Studies 12/1 79–92 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:FEST.0000026121.18280.d0
S Beauvoir Particlede (1953) The Second Sex Alfred A.Knopf/Harmondsworth New York, Penguin
Department of Constitutional Affairs, Response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights Nineteenth Report of Session 2002–2003 Draft Gender Recognition Bill (London: Department of Constitutional Affairs, 2003)
J. Derrida (1981) Positions University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, Draft Gender Recognition Bill Nineteenth Report of Session 2002–2003, H.L. Paper 118-I, H.C. 1276-I. (London: The Stationery Office, 2003)
S. Jeffreys (1998) “Heterosexuality and the Desire for Gender” D. Richardson (Eds) Theorising Heterosexuality Open University Press Buckingham
J. Raymond (1998) “Sappho by Surgery: the Transsexually Constructed Lesbian-Feminist” P.D. Hopkins (Eds) Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture and Technology University Press Bloomington, IN: Indiana
H Rubin (2003) Self-Made Men: Identity and Embodiment among Transsexual Men Vanderbilt University Press Nashville
A. Sharpe (2002) ArticleTitle“English Transgender Law Reform and the Spectre of Corbett” Feminist Legal Studies 10/1 65–89 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014913430147
A., Sharpe (2002) Transgender Jurisprudence: Dysphoric Bodies of Law Cavendish London
R. Sandland (1998) ArticleTitle“Seeing Double, Or, Why ‘To Be or Not To Be’ is (Not) The Question For Feminist Legal Studies” Social and Legal Studies 7 IssueID3 307–338
R. Sandland (2003) ArticleTitle“Crossing and Not Crossing: Gender, Sexuality and Melancholy in the European Court of Human Rights” Feminist Legal Studies 11/2 191–209 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025031126520
S. Whittle (2002) Respect and Equality: Transsexual and Transgender Rights London Cavendish
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandland, R. Feminism and the Gender Recognition Act 2004. Feminist Legal Stud 13, 43–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-1456-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-1456-3