Skip to main content
Log in

No evidence for differential survival or predation between sympatric color morphs of an aposematic poison frog

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because variation in warning signals slows down the predator education process, aposematic theory predicts that animal warning signals should be monomorphic. Yet, warning color polytypisms are not uncommon in aposematic species. In cases where warning signal variants are separated geographically, adaptation to local predators could explain this variation. However, this cannot explain the persistence of sympatric polymorphisms in aposematic taxa. The strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio) exhibits both allopatric and sympatric warning color variation in and around the Bocas del Toro archipelago of Panama. One explanation that has been proposed for the rapid diversification of O. pumilio coloration in this archipelago is low predation; if island populations have few predators, stabilizing selection would be relaxed opening the door for diversification via selection or genetic drift. Using a combination of mark-recapture and clay model studies, we tested for differences in survival and predation among sympatric red and yellow color morphs of O. pumilio from Bastimentos Island. We found no evidence for differential survival or predation in this population, despite the fact that one morph (red) is more common and widely distributed than the other (yellow). Even in an area of the island where the yellow morph is not found, predator attack rates were similar among morphs. Visual modeling suggests that yellow and red morphs are distinguishable and conspicuous against a variety of backgrounds and by viewers with different visual systems. Our results suggest that general avoidance by predators of red and yellow, both of which are typical warning colors used throughout the animal kingdom, may be contributing to the apparent stability of this polymorphism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DR, Burnham KP (2002) Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. J Wildl Manage 66:912–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED III (1993) Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging avian predators in Costa Rica. Evolution 47:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL, Twomey E, Amézquita A, De Souza MB, Caldwell JP, Lötters S, Von May R, Melo-Sampaio PR, Mejía-Vargas D, Perez-Pena P, Pepper M, Poelman EH, Sanchez-Rodriguez M, Summers K (2011) A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae). Zootaxa 3083:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouteau M, Angers B (2011) The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals. Am Nat 178:810–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chouteau M, Angers B (2012) Wright’s shifting balance theory and the diversification of aposematic signals. PLoS ONE 7:e34028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chouteau M, Summers K, Morales V, Angers B (2011) Advergence in Müllerian mimicry: the case of the poison dart frogs of Northern Peru revisited. Biol Lett 7:796–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings ME, Jordão JM, Cronin TW, Oliveira RF (2008) Visual ecology of the fiddler crab, Uca tangeri: effects of sex, viewer and background on conspicuousness. Anim Behav 75:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly JW, Myers CW (1967) Toxicity of Panamanian poison frogs (Dendrobates): some biological and chemical aspects. Science 156:970–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA, Mielke PW (2005) Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them. Biol J Linn Soc 86:405–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez D (2006) AVICOL, a program to analyse spectrometric data. Available from http://sites.google.com/site/avicolprogram/. Accessed Sept 2012

  • Gray HM, Christy JH (2000) Predation by the grapsid crab, Armastes angustum (Smith, 1870), on tadpoles of the green poison frog, Dendrobates auratus Girard, 1855. Crustaceana 73:1023–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart NS, Vorobyev M (2005) Modeling oil droplet absorption spectra and spectral sensitivities of bird cone photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol A 191:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegna RH, Saporito RA, Gerow KG, Donnelly MA (2011) Contrasting colors of an aposematic poison frog do not affect predation. Ann Zool Fennici 48:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegna RH, Saporito RA, Donnelly MA (2012) Not all colors are equal: predation and color polytypism in the aposematic poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Evol Ecol Online First. doi:10.1007/s10682-012-9605-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmi JM, Marshall J, Pix W, Vorobyev M, Zeil J (2006) The variable colours of the fiddler crab Uca vomeris and their relation to background and predation. J Exp Biol 209:4140–4153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordão JM, Cronin TW, Oliveira RF (2007) Spectral sensitivity of four species of fiddler crabs (Uca pugnax, Uca pugilator, Uca vomeris and Uca tangeri) measured by in situ microspectrophotometry. J Exp Biol 210:447–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joron M, Mallet J (1998) Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm? Trends Ecol Evol 13:461–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus H, Maynard Smith S (1966) Some evolutionary consequences of pegmatypic mating systems (imprinting). Am Nat 100:619–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maan ME, Cummings ME (2008) Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 62:2334–2345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maan ME, Cummings ME (2009) Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19072–19077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maan ME, Cummings ME (2012) Poison frog colors are honest signals of toxicity, particularly for bird predators. Am Nat 179:E1–E14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes J, Alatalo RV (1997) Effects of novelty and gregariousness in survival of aposematic prey. Behav Ecol 8:174–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes J, Marples N, Endler J (2005) The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol Evol 20:598–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marples NM, Roper TJ, Harper DGC (1998) Responses of wild birds to novel prey: evidence of dietary conservatism. Oikos 83:161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan BP, Comeault AA (2009) The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biol Lett 5:51–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton EB (1890) The colours of animals. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co. Ltd., London

  • Pröhl H, Berke O (2001) Spatial distributions of male and female strawberry poison frogs and their relation to female reproductive resources. Oecologia 129:534–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Pröhl H, Ostrowski T (2011) Behavioural elements reflect phenotypic colour divergence in a poison frog. Evol Ecol 25:993–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeczek K, Mueller C, Vamosi SM (2008) The evolution of aposematism is accompanied by increased diversification. Integr Zool 3:149–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RG, Fitzpatrick BM (2007) Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution 61:2253–2259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards-Zawacki CL, Cummings ME (2011) Intraspecific reproductive character displacement in a polymorphic poison dart frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Evolution 65:259–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards-Zawacki CL, Wang IJ, Summers K (2012) Mate choice and the genetic basis for colour variation in a polymorphic dart frog: inferences from a wild pedigree. Mol Ecol 21:3879–3892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudh A, Rogell B, Hastad O, Qvarnstrom A (2011) Rapid population divergence linked with co-variation between coloration and sexual display in strawberry poison frogs. Evolution 65:1271–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Franks DW, Balogh ACV, Leimar O, Van Baalen M (2008) Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey. Evolution 62:2913–2921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saporito RA, Donnelly MA, Garraffo HM, Spande TF, Daly JW (2006) Geographic and seasonal variation in alkaloid-based chemical defenses of Dendrobates pumilio from Bocas del Toro, Panama. J Chem Ecol 32:795–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saporito RA, Zuercher R, Roberts M, Gerow KG, Donnelly MA (2007) Experimental evidence for aposematism in the dendrobatid poison frog Oophaga pumilio. Copeia 2007:1006–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler W, Roper TJ (1992) Responses to warning coloration in avian predators. Adv Stud Behav 21:111–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiger MB (1967) A computer simulation study of the influence of imprinting on population structure. Am Nat 101:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi A, Cronin TW, Loew ER, Vorobyev M, Summers K (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. J Exp Biol 207:2471–2485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skelhorn J (2011) Colour biases are a question of conspecifics’ taste. Anim Behav 81:825–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1975) Innate recognition of coral snake pattern by a possible avian predator. Science 187:759–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summers K, Bermingham E, Weigt L, McCafferty S, Dahlstrom L (1997) Phenotypic and genetic divergence in three species of dart-poison frogs with contrasting parental behavior. J Hered 88:8–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summers K, Symula R, Clough M, Cronin T (1999) Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2141–2145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tazzyman SJ, Iwasa Y (2010) Sexual selection can increase the effect of random genetic drift: a quantitative genetic model of polymorphism in Oophaga pumilio, the strawberry poison-dart frog. Evolution 64:1719–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verzijden MN, Lachlan RF, Servedio MR (2005) Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 59:2097–2108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vorobyev M, Osorio D (1998) Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:351–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager J, Wooten C, Summers K (2011) A new technique for the production of large numbers of clay models for field studies of predation. Herpetol Rev 42:357–359

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Narissa Bax, Sebastian Castillo, Ricardo Cossio, Anisha Devar, Deyvis Gonzalez, Eli Hornstein, Danny Lenger, Tom Richards, Becky Richards, Eric Rightley, Tracy Stetzinger, Geoff Zawacki and Amanda Zellmer for help with the mark-recapture study and to Anisha Devar for help with the predation experiment. The STRI provided logistical support for this project and we are particularly grateful to Gabriel Jacome and Plinio Gondola of the Bocas del Toro Field Station. This study was financially supported by short-term fellowships from STRI to CLRZ and JY, postdoctoral fellowships from the National Science Foundation (Award No. 0801165) and the University of California President’s office to CLRZ, and a Tulane Dean’s grant to HPSB. The Panamanian National Authority for the Environment (ANAM) provided research permission for this study. This work complied with IACUC protocols (University of Michigan No. 09765, Tulane University No. 0832 and STRI No. 2007-17-12-15-07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinne L. Richards-Zawacki.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 392 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards-Zawacki, C.L., Yeager, J. & Bart, H.P.S. No evidence for differential survival or predation between sympatric color morphs of an aposematic poison frog. Evol Ecol 27, 783–795 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9636-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9636-0

Keywords

Navigation