Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of seed dispersal in North American Ephedra

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Related plants often produce seeds that are dispersed in very different ways, raising questions of how and why plants undergo adaptive shifts in key aspects of their reproductive ecology. Here we analyze the evolution of seed dispersal syndromes in an ancient group of plants. Ephedra (Gymnospermae; Gnetales; Ephedraceae) is a genus containing ≈50 species in semiarid ecosystems worldwide and with three distinct types of cones. We collected mature cones and seeds of ten species of Ephedra in southwestern United States and measured nine morphological traits for each species. Principal component analysis and other data characterized three types of Ephedra cones and seeds. Species with dry, winged cone bracts are dispersed by wind (i.e., E. torreyana and E. trifurca), those with succulent, brightly-colored cone bracts are dispersed by frugivorous birds (i.e., E. antisyphilitica), and those with small, dry cone bracts and large seeds are dispersed by seed-caching rodents (e.g., E. viridis and E. californica). Two species (E. funerea and E. nevadensis) have cone and seed morphologies intermediate between two seed dispersal syndromes. Seed and cones traits were mapped onto two recent phylogenies to help reveal the evolutionary history of seed dispersal syndromes. Bird dispersal is thought to be the ancestral form of seed dispersal in ephedras as it is common in the Old World where Ephedra originated, but the three North American species dispersed by birds are not monophyletic. The two wind dispersed species in North America also do not cluster together, suggesting separate origins. Seed dispersal by seed-caching rodents is common in North America and appears to have evolved several times, but this syndrome is absent form other continents. The evolutionary history of Ephedra in North America suggests that the means of seed dispersal has been malleable. Evolutionary shifts were likely linked to changes in ecological conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benkman CW, Siepielski AM (2004) A keystone selective agent? Pine squirrels and the frequency of serotiny in lodgepole pine. Ecology 85:2082–2087. doi:10.1890/04-0177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JC, MacMahon JA (1994) A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:263–292. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane PR (1996) The fossil history of the Gnetales. Int J Plant Sci 157(6 Suppl):S50–S57. doi:10.1086/297403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler HC (1939) Monograph of the North American species of the genus Ephedra. Ann Mo Bot Gard 26:373–428. doi:10.2307/2394299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Morton SR (1984) Dispersal adaptations of some Acacia species in the Australian arid zone. Ecology 65:1038–1051. doi:10.2307/1938312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag H, Maier-Stolte M (1989) The Ephedra-species of P. Forsskal: identity and typification. Taxonomy 38:545–556. doi:10.2307/1222629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman WE (1990) Double fertilization in ephedra, a nonflowering seed plant: its bearing on the origin of angiosperms. Science 247:951–954. doi:10.1126/science.247.4945.951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman WE, Carmichael JS (1996) Double fertilization in Gnetales: implications for understanding reproductive diversification among seed plants. Int J Plant Sci 157(6 Suppl):S77–S94. doi:10.1086/297405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron RP, Reichman OJ (1995) Food perishability and inventory management: a comparison of three caching strategies. Am Nat 145:948–968. doi:10.1086/285778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene DF, Johnson EA (1989) A model of wind dispersal of winged or plumed seeds. Ecology 70:339–347. doi:10.2307/1937538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander JL, Vander Wall SB (2004) Effectiveness of six species of rodents as dispersers of singleleaf piñon pine (Pinus monophylla). Oecologia 138:57–65. doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1393-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander JL, Vander Wall SB (2009) Seed dispersal in North American Ephedra. Int J Plant Sci 170:323–330. doi:10.1086/596334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Price RA (2003) Estimation of the age of extant Ephedra using chloroplast rbcL sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 20:435–440. doi:10.1093/molbev/msg049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Giannasi DE, Price RA (2005) Phylogenetic relationships in Ephedra (Ephedraceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:48–59. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.12.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ickert-Bond SM, Wojciechowski MF (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in Ephedra (Gnetales): evidence from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data. Syst Bot 29:834–849. doi:10.1600/0363644042451143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen PA, Bongers F, Hemerik L (2004) Seed mass and mast seedling enhance dispersal by a neotropical scatter-hoarding rodent. Ecol Monogr 74:569–589. doi:10.1890/03-4042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanner RM (1998) Seed dispersal in Pinus. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Longland WS, Jenkins SH, VanderWall SB, Veech JA, Pyare S (2001) Seedling recruitment in Oryzopsis hymenoides: are desert granivores mutualists or predators? Ecology 82:3131–3148

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer SE, Kitchen SG, Wilson GR, Stevens R (1988) Proposed rule: Ephedra viridis green Mormon tea. Assoc Off Seed Anal Newsl 62:18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Price RA (1996) Systematics of the Gnetales: a review of morphological and molecular evidence. Int J Plant Sci 157(6 Suppl):S40–S49. doi:10.1086/297402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price MV, Jenkins SH (1986) Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers. In: Murray DR (ed) Seed dispersal. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 191–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo SE, Portnoy S, Augspurger CK (2006) Incorporating animal behavior into seed dispersal models: implications for seed shadows. Ecology 87:3160–3174. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[3160:IABISD]2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin C, Pedersen KR, Friis EM (2004) On the evolutionary history of Ephedra: cretaceous fossils and extant molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16571–16576. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407588101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, vol 1–2, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary 943 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506. doi:10.1086/282929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapanian MA, Smith CC (1978) A model for seed scatterhoarding: coevolution of fox squirrels and black walnuts. Ecology 59:884–896. doi:10.2307/1938541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapf O (1889) Die Arten der Gattung Ephedra. Denkscr Kaiserl Akad Wiss Wien Math Nat Wiss Kl 56:1–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson DW (1993) Mormon-tea or joint-fir family. In: Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 2; pteridophytes and gymnosperms, pp. 428–434

  • Thomson JD, Wilson P (2008) Explaining evolutionary shifts between bee and hummingbird pollination: convergence, divergence, and directionality. Int J Plant Sci 169:23–38. doi:10.1086/523361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomback DF, Linhart YB (1990) The evolution of bird-dispersed pines. Evol Ecol 4:185–219. doi:10.1007/BF02214330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (1990) Food hoarding in animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (1992) The role of animals in dispersing a “wind-dispersed” pine. Ecology 73:614–621. doi:10.2307/1940767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (1993) Cache site selection by chipmunks (Tamias spp.) and its influence on the effectiveness of seed dispersal in Jeffrey Pine (Pinus jeffreyi). Oecologia 96:246–252. doi:10.1007/BF00317738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (2001) The evolutionary ecology of nut dispersal. Bot Rev 67:74–117. doi:10.1007/BF02857850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB (2003) Effects of seed size of wind-dispersed pines (Pinus) on secondary seed dispersal and the caching behavior of rodents. Oikos 100:25–34. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11973.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB, Longland WS (2004) Diplochory and the evolution of seed dispersal. In: Forget PM et al (eds) Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Gworek JR (2005) Two-phase seed dispersal: linking the effects of frugivorous birds and seed-caching rodents. Oecologia 145:282–287. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0125-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank David, Jaylyn and Daphne Hollander, Kathryn Milliken and David Charlet for their help with seed collecting. Jeanne Chambers, Steve Jenkins, Bill Longland, Gene Schupp and Glenn Miller made helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen B. Vander Wall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollander, J.L., Vander Wall, S.B. & Baguley, J.G. Evolution of seed dispersal in North American Ephedra . Evol Ecol 24, 333–345 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9309-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-009-9309-1

Keywords

Navigation