Abstract
In the plagiotropic nodally rooting clonal herb, Trifolium repens,the development of branches on stems is primarily controlled by the presence of nodal roots, and apical dominance is of secondary importance; only six to ten branches form distal to the youngest nodal root on a horizontal stem. We assessed the hypothesis that this phenomenon is general for clonal herbs with prostrate nodally rooting stems, and that they all have the same physiological system regulating branching, by testing a selection of species from diverse angiosperm families that exhibit either ‘phalanx’ (Leptinella (Asteraceae), Hydrocotyle (Apiaceae), Acaena (Rosaceae)) or ‘guerilla’ (Vinca (Apocynaceae), Glechoma and Lamiastrum (Lamiaceae)) growth strategies. In all these species the establishment of a single nodal root on a prostrate stem, otherwise prevented from nodally rooting, induced the outgrowth of a limited number of axillary buds (the number of which was species specific) at the nodes immediately distal to the newly established root, thereby indicating a phenotypic response similar to that in T. repens. Furthermore, their branching responses to manipulative treatments were also similar to those of T. repens, indicating that their regulatory physiology of axillary bud outgrowth from their prostrate stems is similar. We conclude that, for the group of prostrate nodally rooting clonal herbs as a whole, the apical dominance phenotype arises predominantly from variation in the supply of resources from nodal roots rather than from repression of axillary buds by apical tissues (apical dominance). We suggest that evolution of such a physiological mechanism enhances the exploration for patchily distributed favourable nodal rooting sites by regulating shoot development so as to efficiently utilise the diminishing intra-plant availability of root-supplied resources. For the species examined, inter-specific variation in intensity of branching response to a nodal root is shown to be linked to a trade off in foraging strategy, with the allocation of resources primarily to explorative growth (long internodes, few branches) in ‘guerilla’ species or to exploitive growth (short internodes, many branches) in ‘phalanx’ species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P.W. Barlow (1989) ArticleTitleMeristems, metamers and modules and the development of shoot and root systems Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 100 255–279
C.E. Bessey (1915) ArticleTitleThe phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants Annu. Missouri Bot. Garden 2 109–164
C.A. Beveridge J.L. Weller S.R. Singer J.M.I. Hofer (2003) ArticleTitleAxillary meristem development Budding relationships between networks controlling flowering, branching, and photoperiod responsiveness. Plant Physiol. 131 927–934
C.P.D. Birch M.J. Hutchings (1999) ArticleTitleClonal segmentation Plant Ecol. 141 21–31 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009810731100
M.G. Cline (1997) ArticleTitleConcepts and terminology of apical dominance Am. J. Bot. 84 1064–1069
R.E. Cook (1985) Growth and development in clonal plant populations J.B.C. Jackson L.W. Buss R.E. Cook (Eds) Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms Yale University Press New Haven 259–296
T. Fagerstrom (1992) ArticleTitleThe meristem-meristem cycle as a basis for defining fitness in clonal plants Oikos 63 449–453
InstitutionalAuthorNameGenStat Committee. (2003) The Guide to GenStat Release 7.1 - Part 2: Statistics VSN International Oxford
J.P. Grime (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes Wiley and Sons Chichester
J.P. Grime J.C. Crick J.E. Rincon (1986) The ecological significance of plasticity D.H. Jennings A. Trewavas (Eds) Plasticity in plants Cambridge University Press Cambridge 4–29
J.L. Harper (1977) Population Biology of Plants Academic Press London
M.J.M. Hay P.C.D. Newton C. Robin A. Cresswell (2001) ArticleTitleBranching responses of a plagiotropic clonal herb to localised incidence of light simulating that reflected from vegetation Oecologia 127 185–190 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004420000582
H. Huber (1996) ArticleTitlePlasticity of internodes and petioles in prostrate and erect Potentilla species Funct. Ecol. 10 401–409
H. Huber A. Fijan H.J. During (1998) ArticleTitleA comparative study of spacer plasticity in erect and stoloniferous herbs Oikos 81 576–586
M.J. Hutchings H. Kroon Particlede (1994) ArticleTitleForaging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition Adv. Ecol. Res. 25 159–238
L. Klimes J. Klimesova R. Hendriks J. Groenendael Particlevan (1997) Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function H. Kroon Particlede J. Groenendael Particlevan (Eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants Backhuys Publishers Leiden 1–29
H. Kroon Particlede M.J. Hutchings (1995) ArticleTitleMorphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered J. Ecol. 83 143–152
H. Kroon Particlede F. Schieving (1990) Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy J. Groenendael Particlevan H. Kroon Particlede (Eds) Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function . Academic Publishing The Hague 113–130
L. Lovett-Doust J. Lovett-Doust (1982) ArticleTitleThe battle strategies of plants New Scientist 95 81–84
C.S. McPhee S.P. Bonser L.W. Aarssen (1997) ArticleTitleThe role of apical dominance in the interpretation of adaptive architecture in prostrate plant species Ecoscience 4 490–499
C.A. Napoli C.A. Beveridge K.C. Snowden (1999) ArticleTitleReevaluating concepts of apical dominance and the control of axillary bud outgrowth Cur. Top. Dev. Biol. 44 127–169 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXpsFym
P.C.D. Newton M.J.M. Hay (1995) ArticleTitleNon-viability of axillary buds as a possible constraint on effective foraging of Trifolium repens L Abstr. Bot. 19 83–88
J.J. Pan J.S. Price (2002) ArticleTitleFitness and evolution in clonal plants: the impact of clonal growth Evol. Ecol. 15 583–600 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016065705539
I.D.J. Phillips (1975) ArticleTitleApical dominance Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 26 431–367 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.pp.26.060175.002013
B. Schmid (1990) ArticleTitleSome ecological and evolutionary consequences of modular organisation and clonal growth in plants Evol. Trends in Plants 4 25–34
S. Shimizu-Sato H. Mori (2001) ArticleTitleControl of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds Plant Physiol. 127 1405–1413 Occurrence Handle10.1104/pp.127.4.1405 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjtVWhtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11743082
A.J. Slade M.J. Hutchings (1987) ArticleTitleThe effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea J. Ecol. 75 95–112
J.F. Stuefer (1996) ArticleTitlePotential and limitations of current concepts regarding the response of clonal plants to environmental heterogeneity Vegetatio 127 55–70 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00054847
W.J. Sutherland R.A. Stillman (1988) ArticleTitleThe foraging tactics of plants Oikos 52 239–244
R.G. Thomas M.J.M. Hay D. Newton P.C. (2002) ArticleTitleA developmentally based categorisation of branching in Trifolium repens L.: Influence of nodal roots Ann. Bot. 90 379–389 Occurrence Handle10.1093/aob/mcf200 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vnt1Gmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12234150
R.G. Thomas M.J.M. Hay D. Newton P.C. J.C. Tilbrook (2003a) ArticleTitleRelative importance of nodal roots and apical buds in the control of branching in Trifolium repens L Plant Soil. 255 55–66 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026179202851 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXotVyqu7w%3D
R.G. Thomas M.J.M. Hay P.C.D. Newton (2003) ArticleTitleRelationships among shoot sinks for resources exported from nodal roots regulate branch development of distal non-rooted portions of Trifolium repens L J. Expt. Bot. 54 2091–2104 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jxb/erg223 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXns1Slu70%3D
M.A. Watson M.J.M. Hay P.C.D. Newton (1997) Developmental phenology and the timing of determination of shoot bud fates: ways in which the developmental program modulates fitness in clonal plants H. Kroon Particlede J. Groenendael Particlevan (Eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers Leiden 31–53
S. Wikberg (1995) ArticleTitleFitness in clonal plants Oikos 72 293–297
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Co-ordinating editor: J. Tuomi
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, R.G., Hay, M.J.M. Evidence suggests plagiotropic clonal species have evolved a branching physiology emphasizing regulation by nodal roots. Evol Ecol 18, 409–427 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-004-5137-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-004-5137-5