Abstract
Rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus L.) root system varied widely among the winter and spring growth habits in late growth stages. In this study, we have phenotyped seven different root architectural traits with a diversity panel consisting of 224 B. napus accessions grown in greenhouse during 2015 and 2016. A genome-wide association study with 37,500 single nucleotide polymorphism markers was conducted to detect marker trait association. A total of 52 significant marker loci were identified at 0.01 percentile tail P value cutoff for different root traits, ten loci for root length (RL), eleven loci for root angle (RA), nine loci each for number of primary root branches (PRB) and root dry weight, seven loci for root vigor score (RVS), and six loci for root diameters at two points (R1Dia and R2Dia). Majority of those significant marker loci were distributed on five chromosomes, A01, A02, A04, C03 and C06. Twenty-two candidate genes related to root traits and root development were detected within 50 kbp upstream and downstream of different significant markers. Three of these candidate genes, P-glycoprotein 6 (PGP6), Tetraspanin 7 (TET7) and ARABIDILLO-2 were detected within the marker loci chrC03_12098594 (RL), chrA01_8813067 (PRB), and chrA04_rand_54410 (R1Dia). Multiple marker loci associated with different root traits were detected within a close physical distances on chromosome A01, A02, A04 and C03 referring possible co-localization of the loci for different root traits. Twelve significant markers were validated the marker-trait association for PRB, RVS, RL and RA in 20 germplasm accessions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request
References
Arifuzzaman M, Rahman M (2017) A comparative study on root traits of spring and winter canola (Brassica napus L.) under controlled and water stressed conditions. J Agric Sci 9:58. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n7p58
Arifuzzaman M, Mamidi S, Mcclean P, Rahman M (2016) QTL mapping for root vigor and days to flowering in Brassica napus L. Can J Plant Sci 109:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2016-0048
Arifuzzaman M, Oladzadabbasabadi A, McClean P, Rahman M (2019) Shovelomics for phenotyping root architectural traits of rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus L.) and genome-wide association mapping. Mol Genet Genom 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-019-01563-x
Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM (2007) GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23:1294–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108
Banga S, Banga S (2009) Crop improvement strategies in rapeseed-mustard. Hegde DM Veg oil Scenar approaches to meet Grow demands ISOR, Hyde:13–35
Begum H, Spindel JE, Lalusin A et al (2015) Genome-wide association mapping for yield and other agronomic traits in an elite breeding population of tropical rice (Oryza sativa). PLoS One 10:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119873
Burridge JD, Schneider HM, Huynh BL et al (2017) Genome-wide association mapping and agronomic impact of cowpea root architecture. Theor Appl Genet 130:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2823-y
Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S et al (2014) Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345:950–953. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253435
Chitwood J, Shi A, Mou B et al (2016) Population structure and association analysis of bolting, plant height, and leaf erectness in spinach. HortScience 51:481–486
Clark RT, Famoso AN, Zhao K et al (2013) High-throughput two-dimensional root system phenotyping platform facilitates genetic analysis of root growth and development. Plant Cell Environ 36:454–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02587.x
Coates JC, Laplaze L, Haseloff J (2006) Armadillo-related proteins promote lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:1621–1626. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507575103
Elahi N, Duncan RW, Stasolla C (2016) Modification of oil and glucosinolate content in canola seeds with altered expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1. Plant Physiol Biochem 100:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.12.022
Elias EM, Manthey FA (2016) Registration of ‘Joppa’ durum wheat. Crop Sci 10:139–144. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1025
Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q et al (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6:e19379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
Fang S, Yan X, Liao H (2009) 3D reconstruction and dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ and its application to crop phosphorus research. Plant J 60:1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04009.x
Fletcher RS, Mullen JL, Heiliger A, McKay JK (2015) QTL analysis of root morphology, flowering time, and yield reveals trade-offs in response to drought in Brassica napus. J Exp Bot 66:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru423
Geisler M, Murphy AS (2006) The ABC of auxin transport: the role of p-glycoproteins in plant development. FEBS Lett 580:1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.054
Gómez G, Álvarez MF, Mosquera T (2011) Association mapping, a method to detect quantitative trait loci: statistical bases Mapeo por asociación, un método para la detección de loci de rasgos cuantitativos: bases estadísticas. Agron Colomb 29:367–376
Gómez-Campo C, Prakash S (1999) Origin and domestication. Dev Plant Genet Breed 4:33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-7972(99)80003-6
Herder GD, Van Isterdael G, Beeckman T, De Smet I (2010) The roots of a new green revolution. Trends Plant Sci 15:600–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.009
Hochholdinger F (2016) Untapping root system architecture for crop improvement. J Exp Bot 67:4431–4433. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw262
Hochholdinger F, Wen TJ, Zimmermann R et al (2008) The maize (Zea mays L.) roothairless3 gene encodes a putative GPI-anchored, monocot-specific, COBRA-like protein that significantly affects grain yield. Plant J 54:888–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03459.x
Holloway B, Luck S, Beatty M et al (2011) Genome-wide expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis in maize. BMC Genom 12:336. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-336
Huang X-Q, Huang T, Hou G-Z et al (2016) Identification of QTLs for seed quality traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using recombinant inbred lines (RILs). Euphytica 1:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1675-5
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Upadhyaya HD, Krishna H, Chandra S, Vadez V, Serraj R (2005) Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 146(3):213–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9007-1
Kato Y, Abe J, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J (2006) Genotypic variation in root growth angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its association with deep root development in upland fields with different water regimes. Plant Soil 287:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9008-4
Kebede B, Thiagarajah M, Zimmerli C, Rahman MH (2010) Improvement of open-pollinated spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) through introgression of genetic diversity from winter rapeseed. Crop Sci 50:1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.06.0352
Kiran A, Wakeel A, Snowdon R, Friedt W (2019) Genetic dissection of root architectural traits by QTL and genome-wide association mapping in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Plant Breed 138:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12665
Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE et al (2012) VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 22:568–576. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.129684.111
Koevoets IT, Venema JH, Elzenga JTM, Testerink C (2016) Roots withstanding their environment: exploiting root system architecture responses to abiotic stress to improve crop tolerance. Front Plant Sci 07:1335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01335
Kong X, Zhang M, De Smet I, Ding Z (2014) Designer crops: optimal root system architecture for nutrient acquisition. Trends Biotechnol 32:597–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.09.008
Lakew B, Henry RJ, Ceccarelli S et al (2013) Genetic analysis and phenotypic associations for drought tolerance in Hordeum spontaneum introgression lines using SSR and SNP markers. Euphytica 189:9–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0674-4
Li H (2013) Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. 00:1–3. arXiv:1303.3997 [q-bio.GN]
Lin W-D, Liao Y-Y, Yang TJW et al (2011) Coexpression-based clustering of Arabidopsis root genes predicts functional modules in early phosphate deficiency signaling. Plant Physiol 155:1383–1402. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.166520
Lobet G, Draye X (2013) Novel scanning procedure enabling the vectorization of entire rhizotron-grown root systems. Plant Methods. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-1
Lu G, Cao J, Yu X et al (2008) Mapping QTLs for root morphological traits in Brassica rapa L. based on AFLP and RAPD markers. J Appl Genet 49:23–31
Lynch JP (2007) Turner review no. 14. Roots of the second green revolution. Aust J Bot 55:493–512. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06118
Lynch JP (2011) Update on Root phenes root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiol 156:1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175414
Lynch JP (2013) Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann Bot 112:347–357
Malamy JE (2005) Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture. Plant Cell Environ 28:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01306.x
Mamidi S, Chikara S, Goos RJ et al (2011) Genome-wide association analysis identifies candidate genes associated with iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean. Plant Genome J 4:154. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2011.04.0011
Mamidi S, Lee RK, Goos JR, McClean PE (2014) Genome-wide association studies identifies seven major regions responsible for iron deficiency chlorosis in soybean (Glycine max). PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107469
Markakis MN, De Cnodder T, Lewandowski M et al (2012) Identification of genes involved in the ACC-mediated control of root cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 12:208. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-208
Moghaddam SM, Mamidi S, Osorno JM et al (2016) Genome-wide association study identifies candidate loci underlying agronomic traits in a middle american diversity panel of common bean. Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2016.02.0012
Nagaharu U (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452
Paez-Garcia A, Motes C, Scheible W-R et al (2015) Root traits and phenotyping strategies for plant improvement. Plants 4:334–355. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants4020334
Petrasek J, Friml J (2009) Auxin transport routes in plant development. Development 136:2675–2688. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.030353
Placido DF, Campbell MT, Folsom JJ et al (2013) Introgression of novel traits from a wild wheat relative improves drought adaptation in wheat. Plant Physiol 161:1806–1819. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.214262
Rahman H, Kebede B (2012) Improvement of spring canola Brassica napus by use of winter canola. J Oilseed Brassica 3:1–17
Rahman M, McClean P (2013) Genetic analysis on flowering time and root system in Brassica napus L. Crop Sci 53:141. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.02.0095
Rahman M, Mamidi S, del Rio L et al (2016) Association mapping in Brassica napus (L.) accessions identifies a major QTL for blackleg disease resistance on chromosome A01. Mol Breed 36:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0513-8
Saini S, Sharma I, Kaur N, Pati PK (2013) Auxin: a master regulator in plant root development. Plant Cell Rep 32:741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-013-1430-5
Sanguineti MC, Li S, MacCaferri M et al (2007) Genetic dissection of seminal root architecture in elite durum wheat germplasm. Ann Appl Biol 151:291–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00198.x
Santelia D, Vincenzetti V, Azzarello E et al (2005) MDR-like ABC transporter AtPGP4 is involved in auxin-mediated lateral root and root hair development. FEBS Lett 579:5399–5406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.08.061
Scheet P, Stephens M (2006) A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet 78:629–644. https://doi.org/10.1086/502802
Shi L, Yang J, Liu J et al (2011) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with low boron stress that regulate root and shoot growth in Brassica napus seedlings. Mol Breed 30:393–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9629-z
Shi T, Li R, Zhao Z et al (2013) QTL for yield traits and their association with functional genes in response to phosphorus deficiency in Brassica napus. PLoS One 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054559
Singh V, van Oosterom EJ, Jordan DR et al (2010) Morphological and architectural development of root systems in sorghum and maize. Plant Soil 333:287–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0343-0
Singh V, van Oosterom EJ, Jordan DR, Hammer GL (2012) Genetic control of nodal root angle in sorghum and its implications on water extraction. Eur J Agron 42:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.04.006
Smith S, De Smet I (2012) Root system architecture: insights from Arabidopsis and cereal crops. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:1441–1452. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0234
Soltani A, MafiMoghaddam S, Walter K et al (2017) Genetic architecture of flooding tolerance in the dry bean middle-american diversity panel. Front Plant Sci 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01183
Son O, Cho HY, Kim MR et al (2004) Induction of a homeodomain-leucine zipper gene by auxin is inhibited by cytokinin in Arabidopsis roots. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 326:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.014
Steele KA, Price AH, Witcombe JR et al (2013) QTLs associated with root traits increase yield in upland rice when transferred through marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 126:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1963-y
Sun G, Zhu C, Kramer MH et al (2010) Variation explained in mixed-model association mapping. Heredity (Edinb) 105:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.11
Tabachnick B, Fidel L (2001) Computer-assisted research design and analysis. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
Thomas CL, Alcock TD, Graham NS et al (2016) Root morphology and seed and leaf ionomic traits in a Brassica napus L. diversity panel show wide phenotypic variation and are characteristic of crop habit. BMC Plant Biol 16:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0902-5
Topp CN, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Anderson JT et al (2013) 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:E1695–E1704. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304354110
Trachsel S, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2011) Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 341:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0623-8
Turner S (2014) qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q–Q and manhattan plots. https://doi.org/10.1101/005165
Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S et al (2013) Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat Genet 45:1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2725
Varshney RK, Gaur PM, Chamarthi SK et al (2013) Fast-track introgression of “QTL-hotspot” for root traits and other drought tolerance traits in JG 11, an elite and leading variety of chickpea. Plant Genom 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2013.07.0022
Wachsman G, Sparks EE, Benfey PN (2015) Genes and networks regulating root anatomy and architecture. New Phytol 208:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13469
Wan H, Chen L, Guo J et al (2017) Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic architecture underlying salt tolerance-related traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Front Plant Sci 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00593
Wang F, Muto A, Van de Velde J et al (2015) Functional analysis of Arabidopsis tetraspanin gene family in plant growth and development. Plant Physiol 169:01310. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01310
Wasson AP, Richards RA, Chatrath R et al (2012) Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. J Exp Bot 63:3485–3498. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers111
Yang M, Ding G, Shi L et al (2010) Quantitative trait loci for root morphology in response to low phosphorus stress in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 121:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1301-1
Zhang J, Mason AS, Wu J et al (2015) Identification of putative candidate genes for water stress tolerance in canola (Brassica napus). Front Plant Sci 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01058
Zhang Y, Thomas CL, Xiang J et al (2016) QTL meta-analysis of root traits in Brassica napus under contrasting phosphorus supply in two growth systems. Sci Rep 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33113
Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu J (2008) Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome 1:5. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2008.02.0089
Zhu J, Ingram PA, Benfey PN, Elich T (2011) From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14:310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.020
Funding
This research was funded by National institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), NDSU Center of Excellence for Agbiotechnology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conficts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arifuzzaman, M., Rahman, M. Genome wide association mapping and candidate gene mining for root architectural traits in rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus L.) at late growth stage. Euphytica 216, 164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02700-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02700-z