Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic structure and differentiation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) as inferred from microsatellites

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A set of 67 wild and cultivated hop accessions, representative of hop diversity, was genotyped with 29 SSR markers in order to investigate the population structure and genetic diversity among hop genotypes. A total of 314 alleles was detected, with an average of 10.8 alleles per locus and an average PIC content of 0.607. Model-based clustering placed the accessions into five germplasm groups. A distance-based tree showed good agreement with five germplasm groups, and additionally assigned accessions omitted from model-based analysis into two additional germplasm groups. The 67 hop accessions were thus subdivided in seven germplasm groups, with three corresponding to major breeding groups and four to wild hops. This finding is in accordance with two biogeographically separated hop germplasms (European and North American origin) and with the known history of the accessions. North American hop germplasm was partitioned into native and cultivated germplasm groups. European germplasm was divided into two groups of hop cultivars representing distinguishable European germplasms and three new groups of native hops, which were differentiated for the first time by this analysis. Admixture analysis showed shares of various ancestries in hop cultivars, mostly congruent with pedigree data, and the introgression of various ancestries in some native hops. The above results have so far given the most detailed insight to date into the population structure of hop diversity, which is important for its effective use in hop breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Bp:

Base pair

EU:

European

Hallertauer Mfr:

Hallertauer Mittlefruer

NA:

North American

SSR:

Simple sequence repeat

PIC:

Polymorphism Information Content

rDNA:

ribosomal DNA

References

  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368:455–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Department of Genetics. University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga K, Hill J, Vigouroux Y, Matsuoka Y, Sanchez JG, Liu K, Buckler ES, Doebley J (2005) Genetic diversity and population structure of teosinte. Genetics 169:2241–1154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garris AJ, Tai TH, Coburn J, Kresovich S, McCouch S (2005) Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L. Genetics 169:1631–1638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henning JA, Steiner JJ, Hummer KE (2004) Genetic diversity among world hop accessions grown in the USA. Crop Sci 44:411–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horner CE, Likens ST, Zimmerman CE, Haunold A (1972) ‘Cascade’–A new continental-type hop variety for the US. Brew Digest 8:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakse J, Kindlhofer K, Javornik B (2001) Assessment of genetic variation and differentiation of hop (Humulus lupulus L.) genotypes by microsatellite and AFLP markers. Genome 44:773–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jakse J, Satovic Z, Javornik B (2004) Microsatellite variability among wild and cultivated hops (Humulu lupulus L.). Genome 47:889–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Javornik B (2006a) Genetic structure and differentiation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) as inferred from microsatellites. Cited July 2006 University site www.genetika.si/Structure/Table2_Micros.pdf

  • Javornik B (2006b) Genetic structure and differentiation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) as inferred from microsatellites. Cited July 2006 University site www.genetika.si/Structure/Structure_gene_pools.pdf.

  • Kralj D, Zupanec J, Vasilj D, Kralj S, Psenicnik J (1991) Variability of essential oils of hops (Humulus lupulus L.). J Inst Brew 97:197–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kump B, Javornik B (1996) Evaluation of genetic variability among common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) populations by RAPD markers. Plant Sci 114:149–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2002) Powermarker–A Powerful Software for Marker Data Analysis. Bioinformatics Research Center, Relaigh, North Carolina State University, NC. http://www.powermarker.net

  • Liu K, Goodman M, Muse S, Stephen Smith J, Buckler E, Doebley J (2003) Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics 165:2117–2128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Redus MA, Coburn JR, Rutger JN, McCouch SR, Tai TH (2005) Population structure and breeding pattern of 145 US rice cultivars based on SSR marker analysis. Crop Sci 45:66–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Noli E, Tuberosa R (2005) Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection. Mol Breed 15:271–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minch E, Ruiz-Linares A, Goldstein D, Feldman M Cavalli-Sforza LL 1997. MICROSAT: a computer program for calculating various statistics on microsatellite allele data, ver. 1.5d. Stanford University, Stanford, CA http://hpgl.stanford.edu/projects/microsat

  • Moir M (2000) Hops––a millennium review. J Am Soc Brew Chem 58:131–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami A, Darby P, Javornik B, Pais MS, Seigner E, Lutz A, Svoboda P (2006a) Microsatellite DNA analysis of wild hops, Humulus lupulus L. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1553–1562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami A, Darby P, Javornik B, Pais MS, Seigner E, Lutz A, Svoboda P (2006b) Molecular phylogeny of wild hops, Humulus lupulus L. Heredity 97:66–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosuty and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 3:583–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Neve R A (1991) Hops. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzak J (2001) Comparison of RAPD, STS, ISSR and AFLP molecular methods used for assessment of genetic diversity in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica 121:9–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay M, Kenny ST (1996) Structure and inheritance of ribosomal DNA variants in cultivated and wild hop, Humulus lupulus L. Theor Appl Genet 93:333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radisek S, Jakse J, Javornik B (2006) Genetic variability and virulence among Verticilium albo-atrum isolates from hop. Eur J Plant Pathol 116:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seefelder S, Ehrmaier H, Schweizer G, Seigner E (2000) Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among accessions of hops, Humulus lupulus, as determined by amplification fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting compared with pedigree data. Plant Breed 119:257–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stajner N, Jakse J, Kozjak P, Javornik B (2005) The isolation and characterisation of microsatellites in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Sci 168:213–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JF, Taylor AW, Nickerson GB. Ivancic M, Henning J, Hanunold A, Deinzer ML (2000) Prenylflavonoid variation in Humulus lupulus: distribution and taxonomic significance of xanthogalenol and 4’-O-methylxanthohumol. Phytochemistry 53:759–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sustar-Vozlic J, Javornik B (1999) Genetic relationships in cultivars of hops, Humulus lupulus L., as determined by RAPD analysis. Plant Breed 118:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner T (1976) Divji hmelj Humulus lupulus L. v Jugoslaviji (Wild hops Humulus lupulus L. in Yugoslavia). Dissertation, University of Ljubljana

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology RS; contracts no. PO-0513–0481.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branka Javornik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stajner, N., Satovic, Z., Cerenak, A. et al. Genetic structure and differentiation in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) as inferred from microsatellites. Euphytica 161, 301–311 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9429-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9429-z

Keywords

Navigation