Skip to main content
Log in

Stay green trait: variation, inheritance and its association with spot blotch resistance in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One thousand four hundred and seven spring wheat germplasm lines belonging to Indian and CIMMYT wheat programs were evaluated for stay green (SG) trait and resistance to spot blotch caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana during three consecutive crop seasons, 1999–2000, 2000–2001 and 2001–2002. Disease severity was recorded at six different growth stages beginning from tillering to late milk stage. SG trait was measured by following two approaches: difference for 0–9 scoring of green coloration (chlorophyll) of flag leaf and spike at the late dough stage (GS 87) and a new approach of leaf area under greenness (LAUG). Germplasm lines showed a wide range (7–89) for LAUG and were grouped into four viz., SG, moderately stay green, moderately non-stay green and non-stay green (NSG). However, very few (2.2%) lines showed high expression of SG trait, i.e., LAUG >60. LAUG appeared to be a better measure of SG trait than a 0–9 scale. Mean spot blotch ratings of SG genotypes were significantly lower than those of NSG genotypes at all growth stages. Two spot blotch resistant genotypes (Chirya 3 and Chirya 7) having strong expressions of SG trait were crossed with NSG, spot blotch susceptible cv. Sonalika. Individually threshed F2 plants were used to advance the generations. SG trait and spot blotch severity were recorded in the parents and F1, F3, F4, F5, F6 and F6–7 generations under disease-protected and inoculated conditions. SG trait in the F1 generation was intermediate and showed absence of dominance. Evaluation of progenies (202–207) in the segregating generations revealed that SG trait was under the control of around four additive genes. Lines homozygous for SG trait in F4, F5, F6 and F6–7 generations showed significantly lower mean area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) for spot blotch than those with NSG expression. A positive correlation (0.73) between SG trait and AUDPC further indicated a positive influence of SG on severity of spot blotch. The study established that variation for SG trait exists in spring wheat; around four additive genes control its inheritance in the crosses studied and there is positive association between SG trait and resistance to spot blotch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SG:

Stay green

MSG:

Moderately stay green

MNSG:

Moderately non-stay green

NSG:

Non-stay green

LAUG:

Leaf area under greenness

References

  • Austin RB, Morgan CL, Ford MA, Blackwell RD (1980) Contributions to grain yield from pre-anthesis assimilation in tall and dwarf barley phenotypes in two contrasting seasons. Ann Bot 45:309–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbella M, Paulson GM (1998) Efficacy of treatments for delaying senescence of wheat leaves: II. senescence and grain yield under field conditions. Agron J 90:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaurasia S, Joshi AK, Dhari R, Chand R (1999) Resistance to foliar blight of wheat: a search. Genet Resour Crop Evol 46:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaurasia S, Chand R, Joshi AK (2000) Relative dominance of Alternaria triticina Pras. et Prab. and Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoemaker, in different growth stages of wheat (T. aestivum L). J Plant Dis Prot 107:176–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC (1983) Covariance of relatives from self-fertilization. Crop Sci 23:1177–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin HJ, van Ginkel M (1991) The status of wheat diseases and disease research in warmer areas. In: Saunders DA (eds) Wheat for the nontraditional warmer areas. CIMMYT, Mexico DF, pp. 125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Duveiller E, Kandel YR, Sharma RC, Shrestha SM (2005) Epidemiology of foliar blights (spot blotch and tan spot) of wheat in the plains bordering the Himalayas. Phytopathology 95:248–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista CC, Tangonan NG (1990) Reaction of 31 non-senescent sorghum genotypes to stalk rot complex in Southern Philippines. Trop Pest Manag 36:214–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr WR (1987) Principles of cultivar development. Theory and technique, vol. 1. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorny AG, Garczynski S (2002) Genotypic and nutritional dependent variation in water use efficiency and photosynthetic activity of leaves in winter wheat. J Appl Genet 43:145–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosford RM, Larez LR, Hamond JJ (1987) Interaction of wet period and temperature on Pyrenphora tritici-repentis infection and development in wheats of differing resistance. Phytopathology 77:1021–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner CF, Rathjen AJ (1975) Factors regulating the accumulation of starch in ripening wheat grain. Aust J Plant Physiol 2:311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AK (2003) Development of physiological approaches for breeding wheat varieties suited to different heat stress environment. Progress Report, NATP (ICAR) Project (P-2793), B.H.U., Varanasi, India

  • Joshi AK, Chand R (2002) Variation and inheritance of leaf angle, and its association with spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) severity in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Euphytica 124:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AK, Chand R, Arun B (2002) Relationship of plant height and days to maturity with resistance to spot blotch in wheat. Euphytica 123:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AK, Chand R, Kumar S, Singh RP (2004a) Leaf tip necrosis: a phenotypic marker associated with resistance to spot blotch disease in wheat. Crop Sci 44:792–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AK, Kumar S, Chand R, Ortiz-Ferrara G (2004b) Inheritance of resistance to spot blotch caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana in spring wheat. Plant Breed 123:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari M, Singh VP, Tripathi R, Joshi AK (2006) Variation for stay green trait and its association with canopy temperature depression and yield traits under terminal heat stress in wheat. In: Proceedings of the 7th international wheat conference, Mar del Plata, Argentina, 27 November to 2nd December 2005 (in press)

  • Mercado D, Renard ME, Maraite H, Duveiller E (2003) Chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence as indicators of resilience to temperature stress in wheat and its relationship with resistance to Bipolaris sorokiniana. In: Rasmussen JB, Friesen TL, Ali S (eds) Proceedings of the international wheat tan spot and spot blotch workshop, Bemidji, North Dakota State University, 21–24 July 2002, pp. 60–63

  • Misra AP (1973) Helminthosporium species occurring on cereals and other Gramineae. U.S.P.L. 480 Project No. A7-CR 133, Grant No. FG-IN-223. Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India. Catholic Press, Ranchi, Bihar, India, 289 pp

  • Mulitze DK, Baker RJ (1985) Genotype assay and method of moments analyses of five quantitative traits in a spring wheat cross. Crop Sci 25:162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SP, Kumar S, Kumar U, Chand R, Joshi AK (2005) Sources of inoculum and reappearance of spot blotch of wheat in rice–wheat cropping system in eastern India. Eur J Plant Pathol 111:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rane J, Nagarajan S (2000) Assimilate transportation efficiency in diverse wheat accessions in the absence of leaf photosynthesis. Wheat Inf Serv (Japan) 91:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM, Hindmarsh JH, Fisher RA, Stockman YM (1983) Changes in leaf photosynthesis with plant ontogeny and relationships with yield per ear in wheat cultivars and 120 progeny. Aust J Plant Physiol 10:503–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds MP, Rajaram S, Sayre KD (1999) Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post-green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci 39:1611–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds MP, Nagarajan S, Razzaque MA, Ageeb OAA (2001) Breeding for adaptation to environmental factors: heat tolerance. In: Reynolds MP, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, McNab A (eds) Application of physiology in wheat breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico DF, pp. 124–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelfs AP, Singh RP, Saari EE (1992) Rust diseases of wheat: concepts and methods of disease management. CIMMYT, Mexico City, pp. 1–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari EE, Prescott JM (1975) A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Dis Rep 59:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1997) SAS Institute Inc., Cary

  • Silva SA, Carvallo FIF, Caetano VR, Oliveira AC, Coimbra JLM, Vasconcellos NJS, Lorencetti C (2000)␣Genetic basis of stay green trait. J New Seeds 2:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1977) Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Rajaram S (1992) Genetics of adult-plant resistance of leaf rust in ‘Frontana’ and three CIMMYT wheats. Genome 35:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Ma H, Rajaram S (1995) Genetic analysis of resistance to scab in spring wheat cultivar Frontana. Plant Dis 79:238–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spano G, Di Fonzo N, Perrotta C, Platani C, Ronga G, Lawlor DW, Napier JA, Shewry PR (2003) Physiological characterization of ‘stay green’ mutants in durum wheat. J Exp Bot 54:1415–1420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and procedures of statistics—with special reference to the biological sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H, Howarth CJ (2000) Five ways to stay green. J Exp Bot 51:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H, Smart CM (1993) Crops that stay green. Ann Appl Biol 123:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne GN (1982) Distribution between parts of the main shoot and the tillers of photosynthate produced before and after anthesis in the top three leaves of the main shoot of Hobbit and Maris Huntsman winter wheat. Ann Appl Biol 101:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Plank JE (1963) Plant diseases: epidemics and control. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1968) Evolution and genetics of populations. Genetics and biometrics foundation, vol. I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Subudhi PK, Crasta OR, Rosenow DT, Mullet JE, Nguyen HT (2000) Molecular mapping of QTLs conferring stay green in grain sorghum. Genome 43:461–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CR (1974) A decimal code␣for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Indian Council of Agricultural Research for financial support to a part of this study. The help rendered by Dr J. Crossa, Head, Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Mexico in the analysis of data is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Joshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, A.K., Kumari, M., Singh, V.P. et al. Stay green trait: variation, inheritance and its association with spot blotch resistance in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 153, 59–71 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9235-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9235-z

Keywords

Navigation