Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in effective pollination rates in relation to the spatial and temporal distribution of pollen release in rejuvenated perennial ryegrass

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genebank accessions stored as seed populations require periodic rejuvenation in order to maintain sufficient numbers of viable seeds. During rejuvenation the genetic composition of accessions may be altered for a variety of reasons, of which variation in pollination rates between plants is the least understood. In the present study, a paternity exclusion analysis was performed on a rejuvenated accession of perennial ryegrass. In addition, flowering data of the 49 parental plants were collected during the flowering season. The aim of the study was to determine how accurate variation in pollination rates between plants can be predicted from data on the spatial and temporal distribution of pollen release. The parental population and a total of 551 offspring from 12 progeny arrays were genotyped by means of molecular analysis. Using 25 microsatellites, paternity was identified for 81.9% of the offspring, while remaining ambiguities were resolved by AFLP analysis, except in four cases. Within the total sample 9 cases of contamination were observed. Mating within the study population was clearly non-random, as 61.9% of the identified pollen donors were located within 1 m distance from the mother plant. Observed pollination rates were very well described by an inverse quadratic function of inter-plant distance between potential mating pairs. Incorporation of the recorded flowering data in the calculation of expected pollination rates improved the goodness of fit with observed values by only 0.77%. Suggestions to reduce the variance in paternal contributions were presented. However, contamination was considered more threatening to the genetic integrity of perennial ryegrass germplasm than variation in pollination rates between plants, and indicated the need for improved measures to avoid gene flow from other germplasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, R.E., J.A. Kilgore, R.L. Cook, A.E. Garay & S.E. Warnke, 2001. Use of flow cytometry to determine ploidy level of ryegrass. Seed Sci Technol 29: 493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein, M.J., J.D. Carpten & J.R. Smith, 1996. Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: Primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20: 1004–1010.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, K.V., A.C. Vecchies, E.S. Jones et al., 2004. Assessment of gene flow using tetraploid genotypes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Austr J Agr Res 55: 389–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C.D., 1929. Chromosome behaviour and structural hybridity in the Tradescantiae. J Genet 21: 207–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nettancourt, D., 2000. Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgersma, A., 1990. Heritability estimates of spaced-plant traits in three perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars. Euphytica 51: 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S., 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, J.W., E.S. Jones, R. Kölliker et al., 2001. DNA profiling in outbreeding forage species. In: R. Henry (Ed.), Plant Genotyping – the DNA Fingerprinting of Plants, pp. 299–320. CABI Press.

  • Fulton, T.M., J. Chunwongse & S.D. Tanksley, 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13: 207–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, D.W., K.R. Harkins, J.M. Maddox et al., 1983. A rapid flow cytometric analysis of the plant cell in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049–1051.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, G.D., N.R. Sackville Hamilton & M.D. Hayward, 1997a. The release of genetically modified grasses. 1: Pollen dispersal to traps in Lolium perenne. Theor Appl Genet 94: 1000–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, G.D., N.R. Sackville Hamilton & M.D. Hayward, 1997b. The release of genetically modified grasses. 2: The influence of wind direction on pollen dispersal. Theor Appl Genet 94: 1007–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthridge, K.M., M.P. Dupal, R. Kölliker, E.S. Jones, K.F. Smith & J.W. Forster, 2001. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between populations of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Euphytica 122: 191–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W., 1980. Grass, its Production and Utilization. Blackwell scientific publications, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICONFORS, 2001. Improving germplasm conservation methods for perennial European forage species. http://www.igergru.bbsrc.ac.uk/iconfors/projectannouncement.htm.

  • Jansen, R.C. & A.P.M. den Nijs, 1993. A statistical method for estimating the proportion of unreduced pollen grains in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) via the size of the pollen grains. Euphytica 70: 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarne, P. & P.J.L. Lagoda, 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 424–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.C., V.L. Bradley & M.A. Evans, 2002. Effective population size during grass germplasm seed regeneration. Crop Sci 42: 286–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.C., V.L. Bradley & M.A. Evans, 2004. Inflorescence sampling improves effective population size of grasses. Crop Sci 44: 1450–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.S., M.P. Dupal, R. Kölliker, M.C. Drayton & J.W. Forster, 2001. Development and characterisation of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Theor Appl Genet 102: 405–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik, C., W.A. Meyer & B.S. Gaut, 1999. Assessing the abundance and polymorphism of simple sequence repeats in perennial ryegrass. Crop Sci 39: 1136–1141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubik, C., M. Sawkins, W.A. Meyer & B.S. Gaut, 2001. Genetic diversity in seven perennial ryegrass (lolium perenne L.) cultivars based on SSR markers. Crop Sci 41: 1565–1572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lexer, C., B. Heinze, H. Steinkellner, S. Kampfer, B. Ziegenhagen & J. Glossl, 1999. Microsatellite analysis of maternal half-sib families of Quercus robur, pedunculate oak: Detection of seed contamination and inference of the seed parents from the offspring. Theor Appl Genet 99: 185–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marum, P., I.D. Thomas & M. Veteläinen, 1998. Summary of germplasm holdings. In: Report of a Working Group on Forages. Sixth meeting, 6–8 March 1997, Beitostø len, Norway, European Co-operative Programme for Crop Genetic Resources Networks (ECP/GR), pp. 184–190. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.

  • Mather, K., 1936. Segregation and linkage in autotetraploids. J Genet 32: 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J.M., J. Slate, D.R. Bancroft & J.A. Barrett, 1995. Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: A caution for parentage and population studies. Mol Ecol 4: 249–252.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queller, D.C., J.E. Strassmann & C.R. Hughes, 1993. Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey,J. & D.W. Schemske, 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 33: 589–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackville Hamilton, N.R., 1998. The rationalization of regeneration methods: how far can we go? The example of forage grasses. In: T. Gass, L. Frese, F. Begemann & E. Lipman (Eds.), Implementation of the Global Plan of Action in Europe – Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. IPGRI, Rome, Italy.

  • Thorogood, D., W.J. Kaiser, J.G. Jones & I. Armstead, 2002. Self-incompatibility in ryegrass 12. Genotyping and mapping the S and Z loci of Lolium perenne L. Heredity 88: 385-390.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Treuren, R., N. Bas, P.J. Goossens, H. Jansen & L.J.M. van Soest, 2005. Genetic diversity in perennial ryegrass and white clover among old Dutch grasslands as compared to cultivars and nature reserves. Mol Ecol 14: 39–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker et al., 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 23: 4407–4414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.L. & C. Wong, 1993. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum Mol Genet 2: 1123–1128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeven, A.C. & J.M.J. de Wet, 1982. Dictionary of Cultivated Plants and their Regions of Diversity. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Van Treuren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Treuren, R., Goossens, P.J. & Ševčíková, M. Variation in effective pollination rates in relation to the spatial and temporal distribution of pollen release in rejuvenated perennial ryegrass. Euphytica 147, 367–382 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9033-z

Keywords

Navigation