Skip to main content
Log in

Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism Through the Looking Glass

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plagiarism is the misuse of and failure to acknowledge source materials. This paper questions common responses to the apparent increase in plagiarism by students. Internet plagiarism occurs in a context – using the Internet as an information tool – where the relevant norms are far from obvious and models of virtue are difficult to identify and perhaps impossible to find. Ethical responses to the pervasiveness of Internet-enhanced plagiarism require a reorientation of perspective on both plagiarism and the Internet as a knowledge tool. Technological strategies to “catch the cheats” send a “don’t get caught” message to students and direct the limited resources of academic institutions to a battle that cannot be won. More importantly, it is not the right battleground. Rather than characterising Internet-enabled plagiarism as a problem generated and solvable by emerging technologies, we argue that there is a more urgent need to build the background conditions that enable and sustain ethical relationships and academic virtues: to nurture an intellectual community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B Annette (1986) ArticleTitleTrust and anti-trust Ethics 96 231–260 Occurrence Handle10.1086/292745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L Bernd (2001) ArticleTitleOn the emotional character of trust Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 171–189 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011425102875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K Daryl (2003) ArticleTitleThe nature of and conditions for online trust Journal of Business Ethics 43 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gambetta, ed. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, 2000. http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/trustbook.html.

  • F Elizabeth (1987) ArticleTitleThe epistemology of testimony The Aristotelian Society, Supplementary LXI 57–84

    Google Scholar 

  • J Karen (1996) ArticleTitleTrust as an Affective Attitude Ethics 107 4–25 Occurrence Handle10.1086/233694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.H Lawrence (2002) ArticleTitleThe impact of the Internet on moral lives in academia Ethics and Information Technology 4 31–35 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015231824812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C Lewis (1998) Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • News Interactive. http://www.news.com.au/technology. December, 2003.

  • Online Publishers Association. Online Paid Content: US Market Spending Report. September, 2003.

  • A.S Richard (2002) ArticleTitleThe use and abuse of metatags Ethics and Information Technology 4 23–30 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015279707974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Age. Spam is everywhere. February 1, 2004. http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/02/01/1075570286875.html.

  • The Australian: Higher Education Supplement. Ethical query in online checking. October 22, 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitch Parsell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Townley, C., Parsell, M. Technology and Academic Virtue: Student Plagiarism Through the Looking Glass. Ethics Inf Technol 6, 271–277 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-005-5606-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-005-5606-8

Keywords

Navigation