Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Toward an educational view of scaling: sufficing standard and not a gold standard

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational innovations in Singapore have reached fruition. It is now important to consider different innovations and issues that enable innovations to scale and become widespread. This proposition paper outlines two views of scaling and its relation to education systems. We argue that a linear model used in the medical field stresses top-down replication of a “gold standard” to multiple contexts. This view is similar to scaling in centralized education settings. A project-oriented view stresses bottom-up spreading or diffusing innovations from localized settings to wider contexts. This view is more aligned with scaling in decentralized education systems. Instead of top-down or bottom-up views of scaling, this paper proposes an ecological model of scaling from a system’s perspective. It emphasizes a sufficing standard that considers top-down and bottom-up structures as well as qualitative and quantitative dimensions. Accommodations are made to populate different innovations across the system. Top-down supports are given to enable bottom-up innovations. Qualitative dimensions in the form of tacit understandings are more important than replicating explicit or procedural knowledge. The spreading of education innovations is cultivated by nurturing professional learning communities, communities of practices, and keeping tabs of their growth within the system as well as identifying areas for improvement through quantitative, baseline studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barab, S. L., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 101–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled innovation for learning: The case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodilly, S. J., Glennan, T. K, Jr, Kerr, K. A., & Galegher, J. R. (2004). Introduction: Framing the problem. In T. K. Glennan Jr, S. J. Bodilly, J. R. Galegher, & K. A. Kerr (Eds.), Expanding the reach of education reforms: Perspective from leaders in the scale-up of educational interventions (pp. 1–39). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Looi, C. K. (2011). Active classroom participation in a Group Scribbles primary science classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 676–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for scalability: A case study of the River City Curriculum. Journal of Science Education Technology, 18(4), 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2006). Scaling up: Evolving innovations beyond ideal settings to challenging contexts of practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 551–566). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C., & Rose, P. (2005). Decentralization for educational development? An editorial introduction. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 35(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eduLab. (2009). eduLab. http://edulab.moe.edu.sg/cos/o.x?c=/edulab/pagetree&func=view&rid=250. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1994). Coordinating top-down and bottom-up strategies for educational reform. In R. F. Elmore & S. H. Fuhraman (Eds.), The governance of curriculum: Yearbook for the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 186–202). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. B., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). The development of education in Singapore since 1965. In S. K. Lee, C. B. Goh, B. Fredriksen, & J. P. Tan (Eds.), Toward a better future: Education and training for economic development in Singapore since 1965 (pp. 12–38). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2000). The three dimensions of reform. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, J. K., Boardman, A. G., & McMaster, K. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. K. S. (2004). Educational centralization and decentralization in East Asia. Paper presented at the APEC Educational Reform Summit, January 2004, Beijing. http://ott.educ.msu.edu/apec/downloads/LeungSystemicReform.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Leusner, D. M., Ellsworth, J., & Goe, A. L. (2008). Scaling up across diverse contexts: Lessons learned from five implementations of the Keeping Learning on Track\(\textregistered \) program. In E. C. Wylie (Ed.), Tight but loose: Scaling up teacher professional development in diverse contexts (pp. 105–124). Princeton, NJ: Educational Technology Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, G., & Ableidinger, J. (2013). Scaling a successful pilot to expand blended learning options citywide. http://cee-trust.org/upload/news/0513130443_Strategies%20for%20Scaling%20a%20Blended%20Learning%20Pilot.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Looi, C. K., So, H. J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 9–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2008). Keynote speech by Mr Masagos Zulkifli at the Association of Muslim Professionals’ (AMP) Community in Review seminar. http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2008/01/26/keynote-speech-by-mr-masagos-z.php. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2012). Speech by Mr Heng Sweet Keat at the Singapore conference in Washington, DC. http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2012/02/08/speech-by-mr-heng-swee-keat-at-the-singapore-conference-washington-dc-usa.php. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). Education: How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, F. K., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2008). Rapid collaborative knowledge building: Lessons learned from two primary science classrooms. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2008 (Part 2, pp. 115–123). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Ng, P. T. (2003). The Singapore school and the school excellence model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2008). The phases and paradoxes of educational quality assurance: The case of the Singapore education system. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(2), 112–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2010). The evolution and nature of school accountability in the Singapore education system. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(4), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2011). Singapore’s response to the global war for talent: Politics and education. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 262–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. T. (2013). An examination of school accountability from the perspective of Singapore school leaders. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R., & Collins, A. (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samoff, J., Sebatane, E. M., & Dembélé, M. (2001). Scaling by focusing down: Creating space to expand education reform. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Association for the Development of Education in Africa. Arusha, Tanzania. Retrieved 7–11, October 2001, from http://www.rocare.org/SCALE7.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Spillane, J. P., Gomez, L., & Mesler, L. (2009). School organization and policy: Implementation, organizational resources, and school work practice. In D. Plank, G. Sykes, & B. Schneider (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 409–425). Washington, DC: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Birney, D., Jarvin, L., Kirlik, A., Stemler, S., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2006). From molehill to mountain: The process of scaling up educational interventions. In M. A. Constas & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice: Developments in content domains, large-scale reform, and intellectual capacity (pp. 205–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F, Jr, Genel, M., et al. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(10), 1278–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2007). Dynamics of change: Decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Educational Change, 8(2), 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Science Foundation. (2006). Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST). http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09506/nsf09506.htm. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • University of Miami. (2013). University of Miami healthcare system. http://mscti.med.miami.edu/program/what-is-translational-research/. Accessed 30 March 2014.

  • Weiler, H. N. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: An exercise in contradiction? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(4), 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, J. M., Mold, J., & Fagnan, L. (2007). Practice-based research: Blue highways on the NIH roadmap. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(4), 403–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4), 364–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, S. H. (2009). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(2), 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Education Research, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    David Hung & Longkai Wu

  2. Office of Education Research, Translation and Development Unit, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore , 637616, Singapore

    Shu-Shing Lee

Authors
  1. David Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shu-Shing Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Longkai Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Shing Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hung, D., Lee, SS. & Wu, L. Toward an educational view of scaling: sufficing standard and not a gold standard. Educ Res Policy Prac 14, 77–91 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-014-9164-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-014-9164-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation