Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

English language teaching reform in Sultanate of Oman: The case of theory and practice disparity

  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sultanate of Oman is one out of many developing countries around the world which have valued English as a very important international language and a tool for achieving multiple purposes. When His Majesty the Sultan came to power in 1970, the government accepted English as the only official foreign language and allocated huge budgets and resources for its implementation through education. However, almost three decades after this, it was found that students exiting the ELT system in Oman suffer from various inadequacies in their English language proficiency, which has had negative implications for Oman’s national development. This has driven the government to attempt to revolutionize English language teaching (ELT) through pursuing a reform plan—Basic Education System (BES). This paper attempts to examine the attitudes of 141 freshmen, who have exited the BES and joined Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in September 2009, about their teachers and the curriculum. The results have shown that there have hardly been any significant changes in the BES reform project, as compared to the previously implemented system—General Education System (GES) mainly due to implementation shortcomings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkari A. (2004) Education in the Middle East and North Africa: The current situation and future challenges. International Education Journal 5(2): 144–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Abri, Z. (2003). Attitudes of Omani secondary school students towards learning English. Unpublished masters dissertation, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

  • Al-Alawi, K. (1994). The teaching and learning of English as a foreign language in 3rd year secondary education in Oman with special reference to reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bath, England.

  • Al-Balushi, O. (1999). The internet and Omani students English language learning problems: Critical study. Unpublished masters dissertation, M.S, S.N S.L.

  • Al-Busaidi, K. (1995). English in the labour market in multilingual Oman with special reference to Omani employees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter, England.

  • Al-Dhafiry A. (2003) Unemployment in the Gulf countries: Reasons and remedies. Applied Econometrics and International Development 3(3): 61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Farsi, F. (2002, December). Sultanate of Oman—a position statement: Results of the national conference “Education for a Better World”. Paper presented in the international conference on the reform of secondary education, Muscat, Oman.

  • Al-Hammami, H. (1999). Education for the 21st century general education reform in the Sultanate of Oman: Motives, nature and strategies of implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, England.

  • Al-Issa, A. (2002). An ideological and discursive analysis of English language teaching in the Sultanate of Oman. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.

  • Al-Issa, A. (2005a). An ideological discussion of the impact of the NNESTs’ English language knowledge on Omani ESL policy implementation. Asia EFL Journal On-line, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/September_05_asmai.php.

  • Al-Issa, A. (2005b, May). An ideological discussion of the place & role of exams in the Omani ELT System. Paper presented at redesigning pedagogy: Research, policy, practice conference, Centre for Research in Pedagogy & Practice, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

  • Al-Issa A. (2005c) The implications of the teacher educator’s ideological role to the ELT system in Oman. Teaching Education 16(4): 337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa A. (2005d) The place of the English language culture in the Omani ELT system—an ideological perspective. Language, Culture & Curriculum 18(4): 258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa, A. (2006a). Ideologies governing teaching the language skills in the Omani ELT system. Journal of Language & Learning, 4(2), 218–231. Retrieved from http://www.shakespeare.uk.net/journal/jllearn/4_2/al-issa.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa A. (2006b) Language problems facing Omani learners of English. ORTESOL 24: 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa, A. (2006c). The cultural & economic politics of ELT in the Sultanate of Oman. Asia EFL Journal On-line, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/September_06_asmai.php.

  • Al-Issa A. (2007a) An ideological discussion of the implications of implementing a “flexible” syllabus for ESL policy in Sultanate of Oman (August, 2007). RELC (Regional Language Centre) Journal 38(2): 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa A. (2007b) English language teaching at the College of Law—Muscat, Sultanate of Oman: Analyzing needs & understanding problems. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching (AJELT) 17: 65–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa A. (2008) The implications of the teacher training program to the ELT policy implementation in Oman. The Journal of Asia TEFL 5(2): 59–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa A. (2009a) ELT games and teacher beliefs: The use of games in teacher education in Oman. Reflections on English Language Teaching 8(1): 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa, A. (2009b, April). Omani ELT school curriculum: Policy & practice. Paper presented in the Oman Annual International ELT Conference, The Language Centre, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

  • Al-Issa, A. (2009c). Reflection through peer collaboration: A study from Omani ELT classrooms. Iranian EFL Journal, 4, 169–216. Retrieved from http://www.iranian-efl-journal.com/IEFLJ-Vol4.pdf.

  • Al-Issa, A. (2010a, March). ELT transformations in Oman: A critical perspective. Paper presented in TESOL Arabia Conference, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

  • Al-Issa A. (2010b) Factors influencing critical thinking in the ELT context. In: Al-Mahrooqi R., Tuzlukova V. (eds) The Omani ELT symphony: Maintaining linguistic and socio-cultural equilibrium. Sultan Qaboos University, Oman, pp 169–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa A. (2011) Advancing English language teaching research in Gulf Cooperation Council States universities. The Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(2): 60–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Issa, A., & Al-Bulushi, A. (2010). Training English language student teachers to become reflective teachers. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 41–64. Retrieved from http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/.

  • Al-Kahtani, S. (1999). Teaching ESL reading using computers. The Internet TESL Journal, 5(11). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/AlKahtani-ComputerReading.

  • Al-Kalbani, N. (2004). Omani English teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the role of grammar instruction in EFL teaching and learning. Unpublished masters dissertation, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

  • Al-Mamari, A. (2007). The effect of teaching EFL online on the achievement and attitudes of grade 11 students. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

  • Al-Mekhlafi, A. (2004). The Internet and EFL teaching: The reactions of UAE secondary school English language teachers. Journal of Language and Learning, 22, 40–56. Retrieved from http://www.jllonline.co.uk/journal/jllearn/2_2a/mekhlafi.htm.

  • Al-Mekhlafi A. (2007) The development of prospective EFL teachers’ specialist language competence in UAE universities. University of Sharjah Journal for Shari’a Sciences & Humanities 4(1): 2–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rasbiah, S. (2006). In-service training needs of EFL teachers in Oman. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

  • Al-Shabibi, A. (2004). EFL teachers’ tacit beliefs about writing instruction in Oman. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

  • Al-Suwaidi, J. (2010, February 3). Concluding remarks: Adapting education to labour market needs. Paper presented at The Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

  • Al-Toubi, S. (1998). A perspective on change in the Omani ELT curriculum: Structural to communicative. Unpublished masters dissertation. University of Bristol, England.

  • Assaad, R., & Elbadawy, A. (2006). Private and group tutoring in Egypt: Where is the gender inequality? Conference paper. Estuarine Research Federation Conferences.

  • Baldauf R. Jr. (1990) Language planning and education. In: Baldauf R., Luke A. (eds) Language planning and education in Australia and the South Pacific. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp 14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball S. (1994) Education reform. Open University Press, Buckingham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkhuizen G. (1998) Discovering learners’ perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context. TESOL Quarterly 32(1): 85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhuizen G., Gough D. (1996) Language curriculum development in South Africa: What place for English?. TESOL Quarterly 30(3): 453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassnett S., Grundy P. (1993) Language through literature. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud D. (1999) Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self assessment and reflection in professional courses. Social Work Education 18(2): 121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud D., Keough R., Walker D. (1985) Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In: Boud D., Keough R., Walker D. (eds) Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge, Oxon, pp 18–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland S. (2011) From policy to practice: The challenges to educational access for non-national in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development 31: 367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chism, N. (1989). Large enrolment classes: Necessary evil or not necessary evil? Columbus: Center for Teaching Excellence, Ohio State University.

  • Coffield F., Edward S., Finlay I., Hodgson A., Spours K., Steer R., Gregson M. (2007) How policy impacts on practice and how practice does not impact on policy. British Educational Research Journal 33(5): 723–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collie J., Slater S. (1987) Literature in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins A. (1991) The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan 73(1): 28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtain H., Pesola C. (1994) Language and children: Making the match. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P., Pearse E. (2000) Success in english teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaus D. (1996) Surveys in social research (4th ed.). UCL Press Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove L. (1986) Teachers & teacher education in developing countries. Croom Helm, Kent

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle W. (1979) Classroom effects. Theory into Practice 18: 138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosen I. (2002) Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT. ELT Journal 56(2): 172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez G., Karoly L., Constant L., Salem H., Goldman C. (2008) Facing human challenges of the 21st century. RAND-Qatar Policy Institute, Doha

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunduz N. (2005) Computer assisted language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies 1(2): 193–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1997, February). Forms of reflective teaching practice in higher education. In R. Pospisil & L. Willcoxson, L. (Eds.), Learning through teaching (pp. 124–131). Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Murdoch University. Perth: Murdoch University.

  • Harmer J. (2007) How to teach English (5th ed.). Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday A. (1992) Tissue rejection and informal orders in ELT projects: Collecting the right information. Applied Linguistics 13(4): 403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismaiel, S., Almekhlafi, A., & Al-Mekhlafy, M. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of technology in teaching language in United Arab Emirates’ schools. International Journal for Research in Education, 27. Retrieved from http://www.fedu.uaeu.ac.ae/Journal/PDF27/7.pdf.

  • Issan, S. (2002, December). Reorganization of secondary education and initial teachers’ education in the Sultanate of Oman. Paper presented in the international conference on the reform of secondary education, Muscat, Oman.

  • Johnson K. E. (1992) Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly 26(3): 507–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachru B. (1986) The power and politics of English. World Englishes 5(2/3): 121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane J. (2002) Teacher vs. computer. Where the educators stands in the technology. Electronic Technology in Education 30(1): 38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiam, M. (2003). Opportunities and challenges: Taking advantages of modern technologies in the language classroom. Hwa Kang Journal of TEFL. Retrieved from http://www.hktefl.org/2003-Kiam-Opportunities.html.

  • Kim, E-J. (1997). A study on foreign language curriculum overseas. Retrieved from http://www.kapee.org/text/2content7.htm.

  • Lightbown P. (2000) Anniversary article classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 431–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low L. (1999) Policy issues for primary modern languages. In: Priscoll P., Frost D. (eds) The teaching of modern foreign languages in the primary school. Routledge, New York, pp 50–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroun, N., Samman, H., Moujaes, C., & Abouchakra, R. (2008). How to succeed at education reform: The case for Saudi Arabia and the broader GCC region. Washington, DC: Booz and Company. Retrieved from http://www.booz.com/me/home/what_we_think/40007409/40007869/40650797?pg=all.

  • Ministry of Education: (1999) English language curriculum framework. Ministry of Education, Sultanate of Oman

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education: (2008) Post-basic education grades 11 and 12. Ministry of Education, Sultanate of Oman

    Google Scholar 

  • Moates J. (2006) Final report. Ministry of Education, Sultanate of Oman

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan D., Tyacke M., Walton D. (1987) Philosophy and guidelines for the Omani English language school curriculum. Ministry of Education and Youth, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver P. (1996) The concept of change management of educational change: A case-study approach. Arena, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, M. (2007). Qatar: A model for education reform in Arabian Gulf. World Education Services, 20(5). Retrieved January 7, 2010 from http://www.wes.org/ewenr/07may/feature.htm.

  • Reigeluth C. M., Garfinkle R. J. (1992) Envisioning a new system of education. Educational Technology 32(11): 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Savignon S. (2002) Communicative curriculum design for the 21st century. Forum 40(1): 2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebiah C. (2001) Computers in ELT: Why not use them?. Journal of NELTA 6(1): 66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Shata, A., Muhsin, M., & Sanad, A. (2001, 8/15 May). Al Usra Al Assryiah [The Modern Family], 1047, 15–34.

  • Sifakis N., Sougari A. (2003) Facing the globalization challenge in the realm of English language teaching. Language and Education 17(1): 59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, L., Sparrow, H., & Swan, P. (2000). Student centred learning. Is it possible? In Herrmann, A. & Kulski, M. M. (Eds.), Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual teaching and learning forum 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/sparrow.html.

  • Taylor S., Rizvi F., Lingard B., Henry M. (1997) Educational policy and the politics of change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedick D., Walker C. (1996) Foreign language for all: Challenges and choices. National Textbook, Lincolnwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Thadphoothon, J, & Jones, J. (2004, June). Enhancing critical thinking in language learning through computer-mediated collaborative learning: Some preliminary findings. Paper presented at IASCE Conference, Singapore.

  • UNESCO. (2009). Education for All (EFA) Global monitoring report 2007. Retrieved August 20, 2009, from www.efareport.unesco.org.

  • Velazquez-Torres, N. (2006). How well are TESL teachers being prepared to integrate technology in their classrooms? TESL-EJ, 9(4), 1–28. Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej36/a1.html.

  • Warschauer M., Kern R. (2000) Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiburg K., Butler-Pascoe M. (2002) Technology and teaching English language learners. Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow J. (1991) Teachers’ perceptions of computer needs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23(4): 475–496

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1997). Education sector strategy. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/extpb/educat.htm.

  • World Bank. (2008). The road not travelled: Education reform in the Middle East and Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/extpb/educat.htm.

  • Zughoul, M. (2003). Globalization and EFL/ESL pedagogy in the Arab World. Retrieved from http://www.jllonline.co.uk/journal/jllearn/vol1no2_home.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali S. Al-Issa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Issa, A.S., Al-Bulushi, A.H. English language teaching reform in Sultanate of Oman: The case of theory and practice disparity. Educ Res Policy Prac 11, 141–176 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9110-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9110-0

Keywords

Navigation