Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do energy efficiency and export quality affect the ecological footprint in emerging countries? A two-step approach using the SBM–DEA model and panel quantile regression

  • Published:
Environment Systems and Decisions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research was performed in 16 emerging countries from 1990 to 2014, using a two-step approach. First, a slacks-based (SBM)–data envelopment analysis (DEA) model annually estimates countries' resources and energy efficiency. In the second step, a panel quantile regression was used to assess the impacts of resources and energy efficiency, export quality, and the other variables on the ecological footprint. The SBM–DEA model revealed that Turkey and Hungary were the countries that got the better rank, and China and India got the worst rank on resources and energy efficiency mean. Quantile regression revealed that resources, energy efficiency, and trade openness reduce the ecological footprint. On the other hand, GDP, consumption of fossil fuels, and population contribute to deteriorating the environmental footprint. Export quality and urban population worsen the ecological footprint but only in some quantiles. Export quality in 10th and 25th quantiles and the case of the urban population all quantiles except the 10th one aggravates the ecological footprint. Thus, from a policy perspective, we have variables that require different kinds of intervention to mitigate/reduce the ecological footprint, i.e., requires many policy measures and the active collaboration of citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/index/emerging-markets.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

CeBER R&D unit funded by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., Project UIDB/05037/2020. Emad Kazemzadeh thanks the Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra for the host and resources for carrying out this research.

Funding

Research supported by CeBER, R&D unit funded by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., project UIDB/05037/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EK Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, Writing—original draft; JAF Supervision, Visualisation, Writing—review & editing, Funding acquisition; MK Investigation, Formal analysis; NS Investigation, Validation; FO Introduction. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Alberto Fuinhas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 10, 11 and 12.

Table 10 Resources and energy efficiency from SBM–DEA model (1990–1998)
Table 11 Resources and energy efficiency from SBM–DEA model (1999–2006)
Table 12 Resources and energy efficiency from SBM–DEA model (2007–2014)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J.A., Koengkan, M. et al. Do energy efficiency and export quality affect the ecological footprint in emerging countries? A two-step approach using the SBM–DEA model and panel quantile regression. Environ Syst Decis 42, 608–625 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09846-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09846-2

Keywords

Navigation