Abstract
Environmental management has become increasingly important for enterprises and has been considered and influenced by stakeholders. Most studies have examined the impact of a single relationship network on enterprises’ environmental management behavior. This paper establishes a conceptual framework including the direct impact of multirelationship social networks on the maturity of environmental management and the mediating role of absorptive capacity based on stakeholder theory, social network theory and the resource-based view. Using more than 400,000 big data texts, including announcements, social responsibility reports and annual reports issued by China’s high energy-consuming enterprises during 2010–2018, we construct a multirelationship social network, investigate the heterogeneity of environmental management by an improved maturity model, and conduct regression analysis to verify the conceptual model. The results show that (1) the network breadth of most enterprises is 7 or 8; the network depth and knowledge heterogeneity are between 500–1000 and 0.5–0.6, respectively; (2) the number of enterprises in the initial level of environmental management has decreased significantly, but the number in the leading level has not increased appreciably, as expected; (3) most enterprises tend to take measures of pollution reduction and energy savings, but green offices such as creating a safer and healthier workplace for their employees are rarely chosen; and (4) the breadth, depth and knowledge heterogeneity of the network can improve environmental management, and the absorptive capacity has a partial mediating effect on this relationship. Finally, several implications are proposed. The importance of multirelationship social network should be recognized and actively reflected through various channels. Measures of green offices or environmental certification can be considered. Enterprises should strive to strengthen their absorptive capacity from the resources in the social network to optimize their environmental management capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahimbisibwe, G. M., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Nkurunziza, G., & Nyamuyonjo, D. (2016). Knowledge absorptive capacity: Do all its dimensions matter for export performance of SMEs? World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 139.
Al-Aomar, R., & Hussain, M. (2017). An assessment of green practices in a hotel supply chain: A study of UAE hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 32, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.04.002
Albornoz, F., Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J. R., & Ercolani, M. G. (2014). The environmental actions of firms: Examining the role of spillovers, networks and absorptive capacity. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.011
AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., & Harney, B. (2021). Unpacking the role of innovation capability: Exploring the impact of leadership style on green procurement via a natural resource-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 134, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.026
Annunziata, E., Pucci, T., Frey, M., & Zanni, L. (2018). The role of organizational capabilities in attaining corporate sustainability practices and economic performance: Evidence from Italian wine industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1300–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.035
Ayuso, S., Rodriguez, M. A., Garcia-Castro, R., & Arino, M. A. (2014). Maximizing stakeholders’ interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Business and Society, 53(3), 414–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311433122
Bai, L. B., Wang, H. L., Huang, N., Du, Q., & Huang, Y. D. (2018). An environmental management maturity model of construction programs using the AHP-entropy approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071317
Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3305–3325. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2949
Briscoe, F., & Rogan, M. (2016). Coordinating complex work: Knowledge networks, partner departures, and client relationship performance in a law firm. Management Science, 62(8), 2392–2411. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2231
Chen, C.-S., Yu, C.-C., & Hu, J.-S. (2018). Constructing performance measurement indicators to suggested corporate environmental responsibility framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.033
Chen, H., & Gong, H. (2017). Literature review on the application of social network theory to corporate governance research. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 33, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2017.33.010
Chuluun, T., Prevost, A., & Upadhyay, A. (2017). Firm network structure and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 193–214.
Crisóstomo, V. L., Brandão, Id. F., & López-Iturriaga, F. J. (2020). Large shareholders’ power and the quality of corporate governance: An analysis of Brazilian firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101076
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x
Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). Institutional pressures and organizational characteristics: Implications for environmental strategy. Harvard Business School Working Papers, 22(2), 111–127.
Du, L., Zhang, Z., & Feng, T. (2018). Linking green customer and supplier integration with green innovation performance: The role of internal integration. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1583–1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2223.
Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.038
Ferrón Vilchez, V., Darnall, N., & Aragón Correa, J. A. (2017). Stakeholder influences on the design of firms’ environmental practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3370–3381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.129
Frederick, W. C., Davis, K., & Post, J. E. (1988). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics (6th ed., Vol. Book, Whole). McGraw-Hill.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for stakeholders: Trade-offs or value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(S1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0935-5
Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management. https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., & Suárez-Perales, I. (2019). Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and their contribution to eco-innovation: Differentiated effects of communication and cooperation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1321–1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1749
Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44(5), 1080–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.001
González-Moreno, Á., Triguero, Á., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2019). Many or trusted partners for eco-innovation? The influence of breadth and depth of firms’ knowledge network in the food sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.011
Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2017). Does it pay to be eco? The mediating role of competitive benefits and the effect of ISO14001. European Management Journal, 35(5), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.07.008
Homroy, S., & Slechten, A. (2019). Do board expertise and networked boards affect environmental performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3769-y
Hong, J., Zheng, R., Deng, H., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Green supply chain collaborative innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118377
Hu, J., & Gao, S. (2019). Research and application of capability maturity model for Chinese intelligent manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 83, 794–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.05.013
Huang, J.-W., Huang, J.-W., Li, Y.-H., & Li, Y.-H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y
Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., & Arantes, A. F. (2014). Mixed methodology to analyze the relationship between maturity of environmental management and the adoption of green supply chain management in Brazil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.004
Jeong, E., Jang, S., Day, J., & Ha, S. (2014). The impact of eco-friendly practices on green image and customer attitudes: An investigation in a café setting. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.002
Jiang, W., Wang, A. X., Zhou, K. Z., & Zhang, C. (2019). Stakeholder relationship capability and firm innovation: A contingent analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04161-4
Kafouros, M., Love, J. H., Ganotakis, P., & Konara, P. (2020). Experience in R&D collaborations, innovative performance and the moderating effect of different dimensions of absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119757
Kawai, N., Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2018). Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries. International Business Review, 27(5), 933–946.
Khan, S. Z., Yang, Q., Khan, N. U., Kherbachi, S., & Huemann, M. (2020). Sustainable social responsibility toward multiple stakeholders as a trump card for small and medium-sized enterprise performance (evidence from China). Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1776
Khan, Z., Lew, Y. K., & Marinova, S. (2019). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in emerging economies: The role of realized absorptive capacity and learning intent. International Business Review, 28(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.11.007
Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2697
Liao, S.-H., Liao, S.-H., Chen, C.-C., Chen, C.-C., Hu, D.-C., Hu, D.-C., et al. (2017). Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: Absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1431–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9532-1
Liao, Z., Xu, C.-K., Cheng, H., & Dong, J. (2018). What drives environmental innovation? A content analysis of listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1567–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.156
Martín-de Castro, G. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.032
Maurer, I. (2010). How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.006
Melander, L., & Pazirandeh, A. (2019). Collaboration beyond the supply network for green innovation: Insight from 11 cases. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2018-0285
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W. R., & Moffat, K. (2018). Company-community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., & Santos, J. (2016). An overview of the circular economy among SMEs in the Basque country: a multiple case study. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(5), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2065
Peixe, B. C. S., Trierweiller, A. C., Bornia, A. C., Tezza, R., Campos, L. M., & d. S. . (2019). Fatores Relacionados Com a Maturidade Do Sistema De Gestão Ambiental De Empresas Industriais Brasileiras. Revista De Administração De Empresas, 59(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190104
Peng, B., Tu, Y., Elahi, E., & Wei, G. (2018). Extended producer responsibility and corporate performance: Effects of environmental regulation and environmental strategy. Journal of Environmental Management, 218, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.068
Pinkse, J., Kuss, M. J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2010). On the implementation of a ‘global’ environmental strategy: The role of absorptive capacity. International Business Review, 19(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.11.005
Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., Santos, J., Baumgartner, R. J., & Ormazabal, M. (2019). Key strategies, resources, and capabilities for implementing circular economy in industrial small and medium enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1473–1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1761
Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L.-P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010
Ritala, P., Huotari, P., Bocken, N., Albareda, L., & Puumalainen, K. (2018). Sustainable business model adoption among S&P 500 firms: A longitudinal content analysis study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.159
Scur, G., & Barbosa, M. E. (2017). Green supply chain management practices: Multiple case studies in the Brazilian home appliance industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.158
Shad, M. K., Lai, F.-W., Fatt, C. L., Klemeš, J. J., & Bokhari, A. (2019). Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.120
Shahzad, A. M., Mousa, F. T., & Sharfman, M. P. (2016). The implications of slack heterogeneity for the slack-resources and corporate social performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5964–5971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.010
Subtil Lacerda, J., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2020). Effectiveness of an ‘open innovation’ approach in renewable energy: Empirical evidence from a survey on solar and wind power. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 118, 109505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109505
Sun, D., Zeng, S., Chen, H., Meng, X., & Jin, Z. (2019). Monitoring effect of transparency: How does government environmental disclosure facilitate corporate environmentalism? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1594–1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2335
Triguero, A., Fernández, S., & Sáez-Martinez, F. J. (2018). Inbound open innovative strategies and eco-innovation in the Spanish food and beverage industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 15, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.04.002
Tsai, K. H., Huang, C. T., & Chen, Z. H. (2020). Understanding variation in the relationship between environmental management practices and firm performance across studies: A meta-analytic review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2386
Tu, Y., & Wu, W. (2021). How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.031
Wang, J., & Mao, Y. (2020). Pains and gains of environmental management system certification for the sustainable development of manufacturing companies: Heterogeneous effects of industry peer learning. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2489
Wang, M.-C., Chen, P.-C., & Fang, S.-C. (2018). A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms’ knowledge integration capability. Journal of Business Research, 88, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.034
Wu, J., Yang, J., & Zhou, Z. (2018). How does environmental regulation affect environmental performance? A case study of China’s regional energy efficiency. Expert Systems. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12326
Xu, X., Zeng, S., & Chen, H. (2018). Signaling good by doing good: How does environmental corporate social responsibility affect international expansion? Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 946–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2044
Yang, Z. J., Liu, W. H., Sun, J., & Zhang, Y. L. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility and environmental non-governmental organizations in China. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101756
Yongming, Z., & Yini, S. (2017). The impact of coupling interaction of internal control and CSR on corporate performance—based on the perspective of stakeholder. Procedia Engineering, 174, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.165
Zhao, S., Jiang, Y., & Wang, S. (2019). Innovation stages, knowledge spillover, and green economy development: Moderating role of absorptive capacity and environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(24), 25312–25325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05777-9
Zhao, Y., Feng, T., & Shi, H. (2018). External involvement and green product innovation: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1167–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2060
Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G. Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 375–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216674457
Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Erauskin-Tolosa, A., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2018). Shedding light on the determinants of eco-innovation: A meta-analytic study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1093–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2054
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71902051, 71972064), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2021HGTB0073), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1908085QG300), the Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Science in University of Anhui Province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, Y., Xu, Y. & Jiao, J. Can corporate environmental management benefit from multirelationship social network? An improved maturity model and text mining based on the big data from Chinese enterprises. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 5783–5810 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01683-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01683-8