Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A decision support tool for climate-informed and socioeconomic urban design

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a novel statistical decision-theoretic framework for urban design from an outdoor thermal comfort (OTC), social and economic perspectives. We combine those aspects into spatio-temporal risk measures which provide a compact representation of the overall quality of an urban design scenarios (UDS) set. We then formulate the selection of the optimal design as an optimization problem which is easy to solve and has a clear interpretation. To illustrate how our framework can be used in practice, we present a real-world study, which is based on a set of UDS that aim to improve the OTC of a specific site in Singapore. We show how our framework provides decision makers the flexibility to make choices relevant to their design objectives, leading to informed and interpretable design option selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acero, J., Pignatta, G., & Norford, L. (2008). Use of clustered meteorological data for microclimate and thermal comfort analysis in a tropical area, 08 2018.

  • Ahmed, M. (2017). On statistical risk assessment for spatial processes. Ph.D. dissertation, Université de Lyon.

  • Algeciras, J. A. R., Consuegra, L. G., & Matzarakis, A. (2016). Spatial–temporal study on the effects of urban street configurations on human thermal comfort in the world heritage city of camagüey-cuba. Building and Environment, 101, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashrae, A. (2004). Standard 55–2004, thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L., & Marinacci, M. (2017). Model uncertainty in climate change economics. Tech. Rep.

  • Berger, J. O. (2013). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruse, M., et al. (2009). Envi-met 3.1 online manual.

  • Cetin, M., Adiguzel, F., Kaya, O., & Sahap, A. (2018). Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using Gis in Aydin. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaguetmi, F., & Derradji, M. (2019). Assessment of the environmental quality of neighbourhoods in the context of sustainable development: Case of the Plain West in Annaba, Algeria. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 4563–4588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidimitriou, A., & Yannas, S. (2016). Microclimate design for open spaces: Ranking urban design effects on pedestrian thermal comfort in summer. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Ng, E. (2012). Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: A review of research in the past decade. Cities, 29(2), 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirkin, A. M., & Koenig, R. (2016). Concept of interactive machine learning in urban design problems. New York: ACM.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, C. R., & Grigorieva, E. A. (2015). A comprehensive catalogue and classification of human thermal climate indices. International Journal of Biometeorology, 59(1), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer, H. (2014). Spatial risk measures and their local specification: The locally law-invariant case. Statistics & Risk Modeling, 31(1), 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenshields, C. J. (2015). Openfoam user guide. OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd Version, 3(1), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, D. (2012). Heat-related morbidity and thermal comfort: A comparison study of Phoenix and Chicago. Tempe: Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng, S. L., & Chow, W. T. (2019). How ’hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63(6), 801–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamble, T., & Bahadure, S. (2019). Neighborhood sustainability assessment in developed and developing countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, E. (2018). Spatial risk measures and rate of spatial diversification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07041.

  • Koch, E. (2017). Spatial risk measures and applications to max-stable processes. Extremes, 20(3), 635–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C. K. C., Gallant, A. J., & Tapper, N. J. (2016). Perceptions of thermal comfort in heatwave and non-heatwave conditions in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Climate, 23, 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P., et al. (2005). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools (Vol. 3). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevat, I., Peters, G. W., & Collings, I. B. (2013). Random field reconstruction with quantization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61(23), 6020–6033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevat, I., Peters, G. W., Septier, F., & Matsui, T. (2015). Estimation of spatially correlated random fields in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63(10), 2597–2609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri, A. S. (2015). A framework of thermal sensitive urban design benchmarks: Potentiating the longevity of aucklands public realm. Buildings, 5(1), 252–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paravantis, J., Santamouris, M., Cartalis, C., Efthymiou, C., & Kontoulis, N. (2017). Mortality associated with high ambient temperatures, heatwaves, and the urban heat island in Athens, Greece. Sustainability, 9(4), 606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2013). Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 860–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minton, P. D., Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied statistical decision theory. American Mathematical Monthly, 69, 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1972). The foundations of statistics. North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodoudi, S., Zhang, H., Chi, X., Müller, F., & Li, H. (2018). The influence of spatial configuration of green areas on microclimate and thermal comfort. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleghani, M. (2017). Outdoor thermal comfort by different heat mitigation strategies—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2011–2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleghani, M., Sailor, D., & Ban-Weiss, G. A. (2016). Micrometeorological simulations to predict the impacts of heat mitigation strategies on pedestrian thermal comfort in a los angeles neighborhood. Environmental Research Letters, 11(2), 024003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapias, E., & Schmitt, G. (2014). Climate-sensitive urban growth: Outdoor thermal comfort as an indicator for the design of urban spaces. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 191, 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooff, T., Blocken, B., Hensen, J., & Timmermans, H. (2014). On the predicted effectiveness of climate adaptation measures for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 82, 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., & Wong, N. H. (2013). Field study of human thermal perception in urban parks in Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 4(2), 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Cong Ye, Michelle Chan, Sailin Zhong and Jan Perhac from Singapore-ETH Centre (SEC), Singapore, for their implementation of the design tool in Singapore Views. The research was conducted under the Cooling Singapore project, funded by Singapore’s National Research Foundation (NRF) (Grant No. NRF2019VSG-UCD-001) under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) and its Virtual Singapore programmes. Cooling Singapore is a collaborative project led by the Singapore-ETH Centre (SEC), with the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), TUMCREATE (established by the Technical University of Munich), the National University of Singapore (NUS), the Singapore Management University (SMU), and the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ido Nevat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nevat, I., Pignatta, G., Ruefenacht, L.A. et al. A decision support tool for climate-informed and socioeconomic urban design. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 7627–7651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00937-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00937-1

Keywords

Navigation