Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Effectiveness of Alternative Policies in Conjunction with Energy Efficiency Improvement Policy in India

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy efficiency improvement is often advocated for fuel conservation and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in Indian personal transport sector. However, in the long run, this policy is found to induce direct rebound effects as it leads to more car trips and hence longer travels. Attempts have been made in this paper to test the effectiveness of alternative energy policies in conjunction with energy efficiency improvements in personal transport sector of India with the help of a system dynamics model. Four alternative energy policies considered in conjunction with the energy efficiency improvement policy are carbon tax imposition, car sharing, car scrappage, and a combination of all of these. Simulation results show that while the combined policy gave the best scenario in terms of fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, the car sharing policy gave the best scenario in terms of direct rebound effect values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbas, K. A., & Bell, M. G. H. (1994). System dynamics applicability to transportation modelling. Transportation Research Part-A, 28(5), 373–400.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allan, G., Hanley, N., McGregor, P., Swales, J. K., & Turner, K. (2007). The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom. Energy Economics, 29(4), 779–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. An, F., Gordon, D., He, H., Kodjak, D., & Rutherford, D. (2007). Passenger vehicle greenhouse gas and fuel economy standards: A global update (pp. 1–34). Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anand, A. (2008). Indian passenger car market – challenges. In B. V. S. Prasad & K. G. Shankar (Eds.), The Passenger Car Market in India (pp. 61–73). India: The Icfai University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arora, S., Vyas, A., & Johnson, L. R. (2011). Projections of highway vehicle population, energy demand, and CO2 emissions in India to 2040. Natural Resources Forum, 35, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baltas, N. C., & Xepapadeas, A. (1999). Accelerating vehicle replacement and environmental protection: The case of passenger cars in Greece. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 33(3), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baranzini, A., Goldemberg, J., & Speck, S. (2000). A future for carbon taxes. Ecological Economics, 32, 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barker, T., Dagoumas, A., & Rubin, J. (2009). The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Efficiency, 2, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BB. (2012). Petroleum statistics of India. Business Beacon. http://www.business-beacon.com/. Accessed 12 June 2012.

  10. BEE (2009). Standard Labelling Programme. Bureau of Energy Efficiency, New Delhi. www.bee-india.nic.in/.

  11. BenDor, T., & Ford, A. (2006). Simulating a combination of feebates and scrappage incentives to reduce automobile emissions. Energy, 31, 1197–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhattacharyya, S., & Timilsina, G. R. (2010). A review of energy system models. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 4(4), 494–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cansier, D., & Krumm, R. (1997). Air pollutant taxation: An empirical survey. Ecological Economics, 23(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandra, S., & Kumar, U. (2003). Effect of lane width on capacity under mixed traffic conditions in India. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 155–160.

  15. CMIE. (2012). Fuel statistics of India. http://www.cmie.com/. Accessed 24 May 2012.

  16. Coyle, R. G. (1977). Management System Dynamics. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davidsen, P. I., Sterman, J. D., & Richardson, G. P. (1990). A petroleum life cycle model for the US with endogenous technology, exploration, recovery, and demand. System Dynamics Review, 6(1), 66–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Vlieger, I., De Keukeleere, D., & Kretzschmar, J. G. (2000). Environmental effects of driving behaviour and congestion related to passenger cars. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 4649–4655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixon L., & Garber S. (2001). Fighting air pollution in Southern California by scrapping old vehicles. Rand Institute. Doc. No.:MR-1256-ICJ/PPIC.

  20. EIA. (2008). Fuel and energy source codes and emission coefficients: Voluntary reporting of greenhouse gases program. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration.

  21. Elias, A. A. (2008). Energy efficiency in New Zealand’s residential sector: A systemic analysis. Energy Policy, 36, 3278–3285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elias, A. A. (2012). A system dynamics model for stakeholder analysis in environmental conflicts. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(3), 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Enoch, M. P., & Taylor, J. (2006). A worldwide review of support mechanisms for car clubs. Transport Policy, 13, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Euler Method. (2011). Encyclopaedia of Mathematics. Springer, Berlin. www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Euler_method. Accessed 5 December 2011.

  25. Fisher-Vanden, K. A., Shukla, P. R., Edmonds, J. A., Kima, S. H., & Pitcher, H. M. (1997). Carbon taxes and India. Energy Economics, 19(3), 289–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Forrester, J. W., & Senge, P. M. (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. TIME Studies in the Management Science, 14, 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ghosh, S. (2005). Future demand of petroleum products in India. Energy Policy, 34, 2032–2037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gillingham, K., & Leaver, J. (2008). Impact of carbon policy on the composition of the vehicle fleet in New Zealand. Paper presented at Energy, Transport and Sustainability Symposium.

  29. Grazi, F., & Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2008). Spatial organization, transport, and climate change: Comparing instruments of spatial planning and policy. Ecological Economics, 67, 630–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greene, D. L. (2010). Rebound 2007: Analysis of U.S. light-duty vehicle travel statistics. Energy Policy, 41, 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gupta, E. (2008). Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries. Energy Policy, 36, 1195–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Herring, H., & Sorrell, S. (2009). Introduction. In H. Herring & S. Sorrell (Eds.), Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption: The Rebound Effect (pp. 1–19). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  33. IEA. (2011). Carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion-Highlights. International Energy Agency, 1-122.

  34. IEA/OECD. (2006), Petroleum product pricing in India. International Energy Agency.

  35. INCCA. (2010). India: Greenhouse gas emissions 2007. Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, 1-63.

  36. Katzev, R. (2003). Car sharing: A new approach to urban transportation problems. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kiani, B., Mirzamohammadi, S., & Hosseini, S. H. (2010). A survey on the role of system dynamics methodology on fossil fuel resources analysis. International Business Research, 3(3), 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, H. C., Ross, M. H., & Keoleian, G. A. (2004). Optimal fleet conversion policy from a life cycle perspective. Transportation Research Part D, 9, 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liang, Q. M., Fan, Y., & Wei, Y. M. (2007). Carbon taxation policy in China: How to protect energy- and trade-intensive sectors? Journal of Policy Modeling, 29, 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Loose, W., Mohr, M., & Nobis, C. (2006). Assessment of the future development of car sharing in Germany and related opportunities. Transport Reviews, 26(3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). The Limits to Growth. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  42. MEF. (2010). India: Taking on climate change. Ministry of Environment and Forest, 1–8.

  43. Meijkamp, R. (1998). Changing consumer behaviour through eco-efficient services: An empirical study of car sharing in the Netherlands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(4), 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Menon, B. G., & Mahanty, B. (2012). Effects of fuel efficiency improvements in personal transportation: Case of four-wheelers in India. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 6(3), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Menon, B.G., & Mahanty, B. (2013). Modeling the effects of energy efficiency improvements in personal transport sector in India. Full Thesis, Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 1-197.

  46. MRTH. (2011). Basic road statistics of India. Ministry of Road Transport & Highways. http://morth.nic.in/index2.asp?slid=314&sublinkid=142&lang=1. Accessed 16 February 2012.

  47. Naill, R.F. (1972). Managing the discovery life cycle of a finite resource: a case study of US natural gas. Master’s thesis. Submitted to the Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

  48. NHAI. (2012). Indian road network. National Highway Authority of India. http://www.nhai.org/. Accessed 16 February 2012.

  49. Piattelli, M. L., Cuneo, M. A., Bianchi, N. P., & Giuseppe, S. (2002). The control of goods transportation growth by modal share re-planning: the role of a carbon tax. System Dynamics Review, 18, 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Qudrat-Ullah, H., & Seong, B. S. (2010). How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model. Energy Policy, 38, 2216–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ritterspach, F.A.A.B..., & Ritterspach, J.C.E.B. (2009). The development of India’s small car path. Management Online Review.

  52. Rodrigues, L. L. R., Gupta, K., & Motlagh, F. G. (2012). Vehicle fuel consumption modelling: A system dynamics approach. London: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, III.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Roy, J. (2000). The rebound effect: some empirical evidence from India. Energy Policy, 28, 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Saboohi, Y., & Farzaneh, H. (2009). Model for developing an eco-driving strategy of a passenger vehicle based on the least fuel consumption. Applied Energy, 86, 1925–1932.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. SIAM. (2011). Emission norms. www.siamindia.com/scripts/emission-standards.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2012.

  56. Singh, A., Gangopadhyay, S., Nanda, P. K., Bhattacharya, S., Sharma, C., & Bhan, C. (2008). Trends of greenhouse gas emissions from the road transport sector in India. Science of the Total Environment, 390, 124–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sorrell, S., & Dimitropoulos, J. (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65, 636–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37, 1356–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sterman, J. D. (1984). Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models. Dynamica, 10, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, J., Lu, H., & Peng, H. (2008). System dynamics model of urban transportation system and its application. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 8, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wei, T. (2010). A general equilibrium view of global rebound effects. Energy Economics, 32, 661–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wolstenholme, E. F., & Coyle, R. G. (1983). The development of system dynamics as a methodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34(7), 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India

    Balagopal G. Menon & Biswajit Mahanty

Authors
  1. Balagopal G. Menon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Biswajit Mahanty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balagopal G. Menon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menon, B.G., Mahanty, B. Assessing the Effectiveness of Alternative Policies in Conjunction with Energy Efficiency Improvement Policy in India. Environ Model Assess 20, 609–624 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9448-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9448-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation