Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new methodology for assessing the energy use–environmental degradation nexus

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The international community is more than ever before worrying about the unremitting global warming and climate change and the responsibility of extensive energy use for that situation. This article contributes to the existing literature by examining whether energy consumption predicts CO2 emissions during the past 50 years in the five most polluting nations in the world. To do this, we have been using the recently developed predictability test of Westerlund and Narayan (Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 2632–2640, 2012, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 13, 342–375, 2015). We take thereby into account the problem of endogeneity and persistence in the explanatory variable. Likewise, this test has the advantage of treating the problem of heteroscedasticity. Using several predictive evaluation measures and assuming the historical average as a benchmark, we find that the basic model of the predictability test of Westerlund and Narayan (2012, 2015) surpasses the benchmark model. These findings reveal that primary energy consumption predicts CO2 emissions in the world and all countries, for different forecast horizons. Further, the in-sample evidence of predictability has been supported by the out-of-sample analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The temperature anomaly in year t is defined as the difference between temperature in year t and long-term average temperature.

  2. The temperature anomaly is calculated as the departure from the twentieth century global average (1901–2000).

  3. The Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius was the first to reveal in 1896 the responsibility of carbon dioxide emissions in the rise of atmosphere temperature.

  4. http://www.climatecentral.org/news/the-last-time-co2-was-this-high-humans-didnt-exist-15938.

  5. Figure 3 in the Appendix plots the evolution of the two variables in the studied sample.

References

  • Asongu, S. A., El Montasser, G., & Toumi, H. (2016). Testing the relationships between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in 24 African countries: a panel ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 6563–6573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azhar Khan, M., Zahir Khan, M., Zaman, K., & Naz, L. (2013). Global estimates of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bölük, G., & Mert, M. (2014). Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy, 74, 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., & Thompson, S. B. (2008). Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: can anything beat the historical average? Review of Financial Studies, 21, 1509–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherniwchan, J. (2012). Economic growth, industrialization, and the environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 34, 442–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth Policy Institute. (2017). Climate, energy and transportation. http://www.earth-policy.org/data_center/C23 (Accessed on 13 Mar 2017).

  • El Montasser, G., Ajmi, A. N., & Nguyen, D. K. (2018). Carbon emissions—income relationships with structural breaks: the case of the Middle Eastern and North African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 2869–2878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Liu, L. C., Wu, G., & Wei, Y. M. (2006). Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P. M., & Laurance, W. F. (2004). Tropical deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Applications, 14, 982–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard Institute for Space Studies. (2016). NASA analysis finds warmest September on record by narrow margin. https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/news/20161017/ (Accessed on 14 Feb 2017).

  • Hamit-Haggar, M. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: a panel cointegration analysis from Canadian industrial sector perspective. Energy Economics, 34, 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., & Newbold, P. (1997). Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R. A. (2013). The emissions of carbon from deforestation and degradation in the tropics: past trends and future potential. Carbon Management, 4, 539–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IRENA, IEA and REN21 (2018), ‘Renewable Energy Policies in a Time of Transition’. IRENA, OECD/IEA and REN21.

  • Jevrejeva, S., Moore, J. C., Grinsted, A., & Woodworth, P. L. (2008). Recent global sea level acceleration started over 200 years ago? Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L08715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, J. (2004). Predicting returns with financial ratios. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Li, B. (2011). The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 39, 5137–5146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Liu, W. (2017). Scenario prediction of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China’s machinery industry. Sustainability, 9, 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Xiao, H. W., Zikhali, P., & Lv, Y. (2014). Carbon emissions in China: a spatial econometric analysis at the regional level. Sustainability, 6, 6005–6023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makin, A. J., Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2014). What expenditure does Anglosphere foreign borrowing fund? Journal of International Money and Finance, 40, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, R. S. (2002). Testing forecast accuracy. In M. P. Clements & D. F. Hendry (Eds.), A companion to economic forecasting (pp. 284–298). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, M. W. (2007). Asymptotics for out-of-sample tests of Granger causality. Journal of Econometrics, 140, 719–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, S. (2016). Predictability within the energy consumption–economic growth nexus: some evidence from income and regional groups. Economic Modelling, 54, 515–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Gupta, R. (2015). Has oil price predicted stock returns for over a century? Energy Economics, 48, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. (2017). Climate at a glance: global time series. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series (accessed on 14 Jan 2017).

  • Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy, 36, 2450–2458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisu, A. A., & Isah, K. O. (2018). Predicting US inflation: evidence from a new approach. Economic Modelling, 71, 134–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif Hossain, M. (2011). Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39, 6991–6999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. S. (2016). Can consumer price index predict gold price returns? Economic Modelling, 55, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeekes, S., & Westerlund, J. (2019). Robust block bootstrap panel predictability tests. Econometric Reviews, 38, 1089–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J. (2008). Modelling financial time series. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, P. B., Ingram, J. S. I., & Struwe, S. (1996). Effects of slash-and-burn agriculture and deforestation on climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 58, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Shi, C., Li, Q., & Wang, G. (2011). Impact of heavy industrialization on the Carbon emissions: an empirical study of China. Energy Procedia, 5, 2610–2616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, J., & Narayan, P. K. (2012). Does the choice of estimator matter when forecasting returns? Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 2632–2640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, J., & Narayan, P. K. (2015). Testing for predictability in conditionally heteroskedastic stock returns. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 13, 342–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, J., Karabiyik, H., & Narayan, P. K. (2017). Testing for predictability in panels with general predictors. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32, 554–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., & Lin, B. (2015). How industrialization and urbanization process impacts on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from nonparametric additive regression models. Energy Economics, 48, 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. (1985). Energy balances and energy accounting (First ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ousama Ben-Salha.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 3
figure 3figure 3

Primary energy consumption and CO2 emissions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Montasser, G., Ben-Salha, O. A new methodology for assessing the energy use–environmental degradation nexus. Environ Monit Assess 191, 587 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7761-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7761-0

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation