Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating willingness to pay for environment conservation: a contingent valuation study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to estimate publics’ willingness to pay (WTP) for environment conservation and analyze factors influencing WTP. A questionnaire survey based on the contingent valuation method (CVM) was carried out at Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Seventy-three percent of the 412 respondents were willing to pay at different levels, and the mean WTP value was RMB 54.60 ($8.03). The results of this survey struck an optimistic note that publics were willing to contribute to improve environmental quality. Logistic regression analysis was employed to compare the characteristics of those who were and were not willing to pay. Chi-square tests were administered to identify the relationships between various explanatory factors and WTP. Conclusions and implications of the empirical study can be provided to policy makers and site managers. In a wider sense, the findings of this study should make a good contribution to the literature related to WTP for environment conservation of natural attractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateman, I. J., Langford, I. H., Turner, R. K., Willis, K. G., & Garrod, G. D. (1995). Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 12(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltran, E., & Rojas, M. (1996). Diversified funding methods in Mexican archaeology. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bille Hansen, T. (1997). The willingness-to-pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2000). Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Applied Economics, 32(6), 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T. (2000). Contingent valuation: A user’s guide. Environment, Science and Technology, 34(8), 1413–1418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C. M., Chambers, P. E., & Whitehead, J. (1998). Contingent valuation of quasi-public good: Validity, reliability, and application to valuing a historic site. Public Finance Review, 26(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, L., Lee, D., Schulze, W., & Anderson, D. (1998). Ecotourism demand and differential pricing of national park access in Costa Rica. Land Economics, 74(4), 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. K. (1963). Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 3, 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M., Banerjee, S., & Hussain, Z. (2007). Untapped demand for heritage: A contingent valuation study of Prinsep Ghat, Calcutta. Tourism Management, 28, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagles, P. (2002). Trends in park tourism: Economics, finance and management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(2), 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2006). Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kima, S. S., Wongb, K. K. F., & Choa, M. (2007). Assessing the economic value of a world heritage site and willingness-to-pay determinants: A case of Changdeok Palace. Tourism Management, 28, 317–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laarman, J., & McGregersen, H. (1996). Pricing policy in nature-based tourism. Tourism Management, 17(4), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-K., & Han, S.-Y. (2002). Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks’tourism resources using a contingent valuation method. Tourism Management, 23, 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. L., Yang, Z. P., Di, F., & Chen, X. G. (2009). Tourism ecological security evaluation in nature heritage area: The case of Kanas nature reserve. Chinese Geographical Science, 19(3), 265–273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. L., Yang, Z. P., Xie, T., & Chen, X. G. (2007). Ananlysis on the value of world nature heritage in Kanas and study on its conservation and development. Arid Zone Research, 24(5), 723–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M., Tracey, K., & Klomp, N. (1996). Analyzing conflict between cultural heritage and nature conservation in the Australian Alps: A CVM approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39(3), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei, F. Q., & Zhang, S. (2006). Financing mechanism of protected areas in China. Environmental Protection, 1B, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mmopelwa, G., Kgathi, D. L., & Molefhe, L. (2007). Tourists’ perceptions and their willingness to pay for park fees: A case study of self-drive tourists and clients for mobile tour operators in Moremi Game Reserve, Botswana. Tourism Management, 28, 1044–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H., & Hawkins, J. P. (2009). Access to marine parks: A comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean & Coastal Management, 52, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollicino, M., & Maddison, D. (2001). Valuing the benefits of cleaning Lincoln cathedral. Journal of Cultural Economics, 25, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynisdottir, M., Song, H., & Agrusa, J. (2008). Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management, 29, 1076–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salam, M. A., Noguchi, T., & Alim, M. A. (2006). Factors affecting participating farmers’ willingness-to-pay for the tree farming fund: A study in a participatory forest in Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, S., & Marques, J. (2005). Valuing cultural heritage: The social benefits or restoring and old Arab tower. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 6, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie, J. K. (2003). The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: How interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of threat influence local willingness to pay. Ecological Economics, 46, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam, L. (2004). The contingent valuation method: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 89–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. J., Zhang, W., & Li, Y. (2006). Air quality improvement estimation and assessment using contingent valuation method, a case study in beijing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 120, 153–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D. (2002). Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 323–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H. Y., & Wang, G. X. (2009). Analysis on the construetion of national nature reserves system in China. Journal of Anhui Aagriculture Science, 37(18), 8641–8643.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, F., Yang, Z., Wang, H. et al. Estimating willingness to pay for environment conservation: a contingent valuation study of Kanas Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Environ Monit Assess 180, 451–459 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1798-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1798-4

Keywords

Navigation